Public Mediation

A.E. vs. Sears

A. E. vs. Sears (Headquarters)
3333 Beverly Rd - B6-258B, Hoffman Estates, Illinois, 60179-0002, United States
Amount Involved: $3,200.00
    • Status: In Negotiation
      This claim has posted for public comment and negotiation. It will remain posted until resolved to the claimant's satisfaction. Suggest a resolution to help these parties reach a settlement.
    • View response from: Sears (Headquarters)
    • Claimant Seeks: View.
    • Claim #: 3875439
    • Amount Involved: 3,200.00
    • Filed On: May 09, 2016
    • Posted On: May 20, 2016
    • Complaint(s):
      • Customer service runarounds
  • Review this case.
  • Propose your solution.
  • Win the reward (1,000)
Statement of Claim
Claimant says:
"Purchased a sears Elite refrig. Cost $3200. Purchased a fix and "replace Service Contract". ($500) Reported a problem with the appliance just before the contract expired. Sears Service tried to fix problem. Contract expired. Problem not resolved. Called Sears they extended the contract. We called Sears service. They told us the problem was not repairable. Called sears, they sent another tech. He replaced a part. Problem still not fixed. Called Sears. They sent another tech. He placed a different part. This occurred until 4 parts where replaced. Last tech reported to his office that all fixes where applied and nothing worked. Called Sears . They offered us $1500 toward a replacement refrigerator. We went to the Sears in Albany, The sales person said there is nothing comparable to what we had but for another $1500 (Total of $3000) We could purchase a replacement. Called Sears . They said the extended contract was for repair only. (First we heard this). They said there offer could not be changes. Asked to speak to supervisor but they said they could/would not give us her name or phone number."
Reply Have a similar problem?
Additional Communication Between Claimant and Sears (Headquarters) Hide
  • May 12, 2016, Claiming party added:
  • Well I am tired of the Gotcha game. After the delivery of the refrigerator we had a problem with water build up. Sears service replaced the Gaskets and added putty under part of one gasket. When we called on the problem of frost in the "frost free" freezer we where told that sears would extend our service contract for 6 months. To the best of our recollection, there was never a mention of "MPA" or "RPA". Several Techs have come to the house and tried to fix the problem. All have said its a recurring problem with this model and make refrigerator. Several have said that the problem was UN-reparable. They where told by some one, on the service line, to try replacing a part. We where told to wait 30 Days to see if the problem went away. After replacing at least 3 parts and at least 3 service calls, The problem never did. The last two tech told me that all fixes had been applied. The problem was UN-repairable. So Sears being as generous, as they are, are offering me $1500 toward the purchase of another one of their products. When we spoke to a sales man at the Local SEARS Store He said "they must joking", There is nothing comparable, even close to that price range. Here is the best joke. From the SEARS Protection Agreement. "Welcome to Peace of Mind."..... "Now your product is protected against the Unexpected".. I guess this was an expected problem. I do not want a $1500 pay off. I want the product fixed or replaced.

  • May 12, 2016, () added:
  • May 12, 2016

    Complaint Department
    People Claim
    P.O. Box 2531
    Boone, North Carolina 28607

    RE: Investigation of Rebuttal Complaint with Sears Holdings Corporation
    Andrew Evans – File # - 3875439-240724

    To Whom It May Concern:

    We have completed the investigation regarding Mr. Evans’ follow-up concerns with his refrigerator and the amount authorized for replacement.

    Mr. Evans has not provided any new information regarding his refrigerator and/or the replacement process. His refrigerator has been authorized for replacement under the existing Repair Protection Agreement (RPA), which has a maximum replacement amount of $1,500.00. While Mr. Evans previously carried a Master Protection Agreement (MPA) that would have afforded him a comparable replacement in the event his refrigerator could not be repaired; he let that coverage lapse and therefore, was not entitled to either a covered repair or a replacement since October 15, 2015. If our Protection Agreement Department had not provided him with a six-month RPA on January 15, 2016, as a courtesy, he would have no coverage at this time and consequently, the entire replacement cost would have been his sole financial responsibility. As we previously stated, Mr. Evans has been authorized $1,500.00 towards a new refrigerator from Sears and even though this amount is unsatisfactory to Mr. Evans, no other accommodations will be forthcoming. Again, we would like to remind Mr. Evans that he only has 90 days to utilize the authorization. If he allows the authorization to lapse, he will become responsible for the full replacement cost of his refrigerator. Since our position remains unchanged, as it is in accordance with the terms of the RPA presently carried on Mr. Evans’ refrigerator, we ask that this matter be closed.

    Again, we apologize for any issues or frustrations that Mr. Evans may have experienced with Sears Holdings Corporation. We do value our customers and strive for their complete satisfaction including a reasonable resolution of any complaints whenever possible. If you have any further questions or concerns, you are welcome to contact me via email at Melissa.Lando@searshc.com.

    Sincerely,

    Melissa Lando

    Melissa Lando
    Regulatory Complaints Specialist

  • May 18, 2016, Claiming party added:
  • SEARS technician(s) have determined that the Refrigerator is UN-repairable due to either a design flaw or manufacturer defect, not Customer misuse.. It bears the Name Kenmore, a Sears product. Therefore, it is my view that Sears be held accountable for the full and original replacement value of the refrigerator.

  • May 18, 2016, () added:
  • WMay 18, 2016
    Complaint Department
    People Claim
    P.O. Box 2531
    Boone, North Carolina 28607

    RE: Investigation of Rebuttal Complaint with Sears Holdings Corporation
    Andrew Evans – File # - 3875439-240724

    To Whom It May Concern:

    We have completed the investigation regarding Mr. Evans’ follow-up concerns with his refrigerator and the amount authorized for replacement.

    Mr. Evans is not entitled to a comparable replacement for the following reasons. First, his refrigerator was not deemed un-repairable due to a sealed system issue, which is the only failure that would entitle Mr. Evans to a comparable replacement under his exceptional parts warranty. Mr. Evans was authorized a replacement for customer satisfaction due to the multiple repair attempts and after he repeatedly contacted our customer service groups. Secondly, per his RPA, he is only entitled to a maximum replacement amount of $1,500.00, which he has been provided. It is unfortunate that Mr. Evans remains satisfied with our decision, but it is fair and commensurate to the circumstances. Therefore, no further accommodations will be forthcoming and we have closed our file.

    Again, we apologize for any issues or frustrations that Mr. Evans may have experienced with Sears Holdings Corporation. We do value our customers and strive for their complete satisfaction including a reasonable resolution of any complaints whenever possible. If you have any further questions or concerns, you are welcome to contact me via email at Melissa.Lando@searshc.com.

    Sincerely,

    Melissa Lando

    Melissa Lando
    Regulatory Complaints Specialist

What Claimant Wants Hide
1. Refund: Refrigerator May 24, 2016 $3,200.00
Cash total : $3,200.00
  • 0
Do you agree with the claimant’s demands?  (If you are a party to this claim, click here.)
Respondent's Counteroffer Hide
The claimant's settlement terms were rejected with no explanation. This claim will remain posted until resolved.
  • 0
Do you agree with the respondent’s Response?  (If you are a party to this claim, click here.)
Refresh
  • Show:
  • Sort by:
  • 1
  • Contributed Solution: by J Petaluma On 05-25-2016
    A "Reasonable Person" would expect an expensive fridge and warranty to last a reasonable time. More...
If you are a party to this claim, click here.
Is this a fair resolution?
  • 1
  • Contributed Solution: by tara piana On 05-25-2016
    Sears should replace the refrigerator with a comparable model since it is not fixable. A store credit that does not offer them the opportunity to get a similar model is ridiculous.
If you are a party to this claim, click here.
Is this a fair resolution?
Get fast access to our Resolver community, for...
  • help with a PeopleClaim or any other complaint
  • assistance with a purchase or contract
  • expert advice
Other PeopleClaim resolvers
Get Free alerts when claims post in your area.
Get Alert

Need help resolving a dispute? Learn more.

Public Mediation

The shortest path from your problem to its resolution.
1
Peer to Peer

Engage the other party and use powerful tools to negotiate the best resolution.

Free
If Unresolved
2
Community Resolution

Post your case online and get help from legal professionals, industry experts, consumers & advocates competing to find the best resolution to your claim.

$14.99 + optional reward for best resolution
Full refund if not resolved to your satisfaction
If Unresolved
3
Private Mediation

Lets you mediate your case privately with the help of our professional mediators and industry experts.

Free to claimant. Mediator fees negotiable.
If Unresolved
4
Engage a Professional

Find the best community-reviewed professionals near you to resolve your issue in private online mediation or traditional court/mediation.

Resolution

A wonderful serenity has taken possession of my entire soul, like these sweet mornings of spring which I enjoy with my whole heart.

I am (not) alone, and I feel the charm of existence in this spot, which was created for the bliss of souls like mine...~ Goethe

Get a public verdict — create an online trial $50 public trial / $50 reward for successful resolution
Important: All information contained herein is the opinion of the posting parties, who are solely responsible for its content. PeopleClaim offers both free and paid services to help consumers, patients, employee, tenants, and others resolve disputes without lawyers or courts, through negotiated online settlement and public disclosure of wrongdoing or unfair treatment.
Claims against parties operating under bankruptcy protection, by law must be processed solely through the appropriate US bankruptcy court. Any claims against this party currently posted on PeopleClaim are available for purposes of public business review only and are not an attempt to collect money or recover assets subject to protections under the United States Bankruptcy Code.
*IMPORTANT: PeopleClaim is a public dispute resolution system, independent of the BBB, small claims court, or other dispute resolution services. PeopleClaim is not a law firm and does not provide legal services, opinions, or advice. PeopleClaim facilitates peer-to-peer negotiation and resolution and crowdsourced input on issues of fairness to help resolve complaints. Users should contact professional legal counsel on any matters of law or regulation regarding their claims. PeopleClaim does not review or evaluate the merits of claims submitted through its site, and users are solely responsible for all content filed in their claims.
© reserved by PeopleClaim