Public Mediation

Secondhand Hounds-Dispute-#6373384

J. C. vs. Secondhand Hounds
Hopkins, Minnesota, United States
    • Status: In Negotiation
      This claim has posted for public comment and negotiation. It will remain posted until resolved to the claimant's satisfaction. Suggest a resolution to help these parties reach a settlement.
      (seeking public comment)
    • Claimant Seeks: View.
    • Claim #: 6373384
    • Amount Involved: 1,200.00
    • Filed On: Dec 07, 2011
    • Posted On: Dec 18, 2011
    • Complaint(s):
      • Bad business practices
      • Problem with a service
      • Contract / Agreement / Promise dispute
  • Review this case.
  • Propose your solution.
  • Win the reward (1,000)
Statement of Claim
Claimant says:
"The Director, Rachel Mairose, did not disclose full history of 6 month old, femaile, Shar Pei named Star (that I renamed Gracie) that needed a home. She lied about the dog being Dog friendly, Child friendly, crate trained, and health issues in order to get paid to have me adopt her. She had a severe case of mange that was evident, even if a person was blind he/she could tell, and neglected to tell me and it went 5 weeks untreated until I took her to my vet to get her checked out to see what it was. I then got an injection for mange every 2 weeks for a total of 4 injections before her coat finally filled in and the mange was gone. She told me that this puppy couldn't be in a home w/children, which I don't have any, however; would not disclose why (due to her aggression) and in the adoption paperwork it states all of these which were NOT true: dog friendly, child friendly, crate trained were all marked yes. Health issues was marked no. This is also a lie as she had mange. She knew that I had a male, Shar Pei, Gunner, and knew Gracie was aggressive toward dogs and placed her in my home. Gunner has countless scars from Gracie attacking him and had stitches under left eye and almost lost his eye. This is not a behavior problem; it was in her genes. I had her for 5 months and loved her, cared for her and gave her a wonderful home. After this last attack and the stitches that Gunner had to have; I had no choice but to put Gracie to sleep at 11 months old because Rachel wouldn't take her back. NONE of this should ever have happend had Rachel been truthful. Her rescue should have euthanized her knowing that she was this aggressive. She had wonderful qualities, a kisser and a cuddler, loved chewing nylabones and stuffed toys, playing tug of war, going for walks; however, when she went into attack mode; there was no warning. She was always the instigator and often times for no reason such as food, bones etc. I have vet bills that should never have occurred due to her neglect in informing me of the truth. I left several voicemails with no return call even though a volunteer promised me she would return a call. I sent several emails and all of them were initiated by me. After the adoption, there was not one follow up email sent to me by Secondhand Hounds. I would update her and when she heard Gracie had mange; she claimed she thought it was already taken care of. She had huge circles throughout her body with no hair; obviously it wasn't taken care of. She finally emailed me a few days after the last attacke after several emails and phone calls and claimed that it is my fault I have to put Gracie to sleep as I won't work with a trainer. This isn't a training issue and she knew how Gracie was before placing her up for adoption. I will never go to a rescue to get a dog in the future. I would highly suggest that if someone wants a dog; find another rescue or shelter to go through. Rachel will turn it around on you and make it your fault when it is clearly no fault of yours; strictly the fault of Rachel and Secondhand Hounds. Please do not use this organization; if you can call it that. I have been in tears for two days and am grieving as I loved Gracie so very much. This is horrible heartbreak for anyone to go through and my last email, again, got no response whatsoever. That shows you how this operation is run; neglectfully and with no regard for the future of dogs they place for adoption. They just want that adoption fee and out the door; now the dog is your problem. Even though one of the stipulations upon adoption says at any point if I cannot keep the animal (as I couldn't due to Gunner being in stitches and needing to heal, not to mention if it were worse and I lost him too) that I will return her to Secondhand Hounds. That is yet another LIE...Rachel would not take her back. I could go on for quite some time. I have all the adoption papers and emails to prove my complaint as well as over $1,000 in vet bills, not to mention the adoption fee of $300. DO NOT adopt through Secondhand Hounds or believe anything that Rachel Mairose is telling you."
Reply Have a similar problem?
What Claimant Wants Hide
1. Compensation: cost of adoption/vet bills Dec 22, 2011 $1,200.00
Cash total : $1,200.00
  • 0
Do you agree with the claimant’s demands?  (If you are a party to this claim, click here.)

Respondent's Counteroffer


There has been no response to this claim from Secondhand Hounds. This claim will remain posted until resolved
Refresh
  • Show:
  • Sort by:
  • Comment: by c48matte — Online mediator
  • On: 03-11-2013
  • I agree with the statements made. There have been dogs adopted out and they did not take care of dental or disclose the dental needs. Also knee issues have not been disclosed. She is all about money and attention. She has taken in dogs from owners that are already fixed and turned around and sold them for $100's. She is rude and disrespectful at times. She also makes money doing this and others involved as well as much as a full-time job. Not to mention she has adopted out her own dogs.
Get fast access to our Resolver community, for...
  • help with a PeopleClaim or any other complaint
  • assistance with a purchase or contract
  • expert advice
Other PeopleClaim resolvers
Get Free alerts when claims post in your area.
Get Alert

Need help resolving a dispute? Learn more.

Public Mediation

The shortest path from your problem to its resolution.
1
Peer to Peer

Engage the other party and use powerful tools to negotiate the best resolution.

Free
If Unresolved
2
Community Resolution

Post your case online and get help from legal professionals, industry experts, consumers & advocates competing to find the best resolution to your claim.

$14.99 + optional reward for best resolution
Full refund if not resolved to your satisfaction
If Unresolved
3
Private Mediation

Lets you mediate your case privately with the help of our professional mediators and industry experts.

Free to claimant. Mediator fees negotiable.
If Unresolved
4
Engage a Professional

Find the best community-reviewed professionals near you to resolve your issue in private online mediation or traditional court/mediation.

Resolution

A wonderful serenity has taken possession of my entire soul, like these sweet mornings of spring which I enjoy with my whole heart.

I am (not) alone, and I feel the charm of existence in this spot, which was created for the bliss of souls like mine...~ Goethe

Get a public verdict — create an online trial $50 public trial / $50 reward for successful resolution
Important: All information contained herein is the opinion of the posting parties, who are solely responsible for its content. PeopleClaim offers both free and paid services to help consumers, patients, employee, tenants, and others resolve disputes without lawyers or courts, through negotiated online settlement and public disclosure of wrongdoing or unfair treatment.
Claims against parties operating under bankruptcy protection, by law must be processed solely through the appropriate US bankruptcy court. Any claims against this party currently posted on PeopleClaim are available for purposes of public business review only and are not an attempt to collect money or recover assets subject to protections under the United States Bankruptcy Code.
*IMPORTANT: PeopleClaim is a public dispute resolution system, independent of the BBB, small claims court, or other dispute resolution services. PeopleClaim is not a law firm and does not provide legal services, opinions, or advice. PeopleClaim facilitates peer-to-peer negotiation and resolution and crowdsourced input on issues of fairness to help resolve complaints. Users should contact professional legal counsel on any matters of law or regulation regarding their claims. PeopleClaim does not review or evaluate the merits of claims submitted through its site, and users are solely responsible for all content filed in their claims.
© reserved by PeopleClaim