My Claim vs. J G Wentworth Dispute

3 2 1 Henderson ( J G Wentworth), Perhaps the date and denial by the court judge to any access or contract to Mr. Brady Nazarovich - record of, the changed beneficiary your Reps. incurred - record of, the "No big deal" response through BBB, can jog your memory on what occurred. This can all be provided. We ask that you settle for these damages.

Perhaps an attorney and or the Government regulators would be interested in this case as this company avoided laws and went beyond legal authority to change a disabled dying man's will as well as ignore Structured Settlement Protection laws protecting him and dependents, then state " No big deal".

3 2 1 Henderson - J G Wentworth. Not only the laws, attorneys and government agencies would want to know about your company's actions, but the people you advertise with as well as the public. You disregard the Settlement protection laws, as well as a judges denying you a contract with a dying man, and forge his will to suit your needs with no powers of attorney. This will scare any consumer away. This is a serious crime. All you say is no big deal. Settle this now.

Nazarovich, Brady. You were denied any rights in court. You proceeded to change his beneficiary with no legal rights and no valid contract. You responded .. No big deal at a BBB complaint, .."he could have changed it back. " He could have not.. dying, dead. Shall I send this to the Gov. Regulators?

Dear J G Wentworth, 3 2 1 Henderson Rcbs., Brady Nazarovich did NOT sign the change of Beneficiary. His signature is not on it. It was a stamp of a company on a form generated by your local representatives. Brady knew how to spell his name. The people generating this change of beneficiary did not even know how to spell his name, stamped it and submitted it. Brady Nazarovich was in no condition to be dealing with corrections on changes he did not make, and after many many surgeries, I C U's and hospitalizations died. Your invalid contract stated you would change the beneficiary. But you were never legal to do so in this case.

This is the information age. My last response in my claim remains ignored. Perhaps a lawyer would love the chain of events you incurred for a law suit. I am sure others are interested in what your company did as well.

As per your agreement between Brady Nazarovich and 3 2 1 Henderson Rcb.s: You admit seeing a notorized change of beneficiary (This change is as stated in your agreement as part of the procedure to sell his income to you). And this was initiated with the lawyers who drew up this agreement in San Diego as agreement stated a change in will. This same agreement states that all agreements made with 3 2 1 Henderson and all agreements with Brady Nazarovich are not valid without a court approval. This agreement was denied by the judge in court. Not counting the fact that this badly disabled for life, man, was dependent on his monthly income along with dependents and such an structured income was protected under the 2003 structured Settlement Protection code protecting such disabled people with dependents. But the "In the agreement" change of beneficiary was submitted with the help of the lawyers assigned, and such a change to beneficiary "Estate" incurred estate costs; court costs, medical and bill costs and more. The original Structured Settlement Company, Insurance, by passed all such "estate" costs. This change should not have been submitted, but was, and Family has done all court procedures for this Estate, and paid all incurred costs due to that procedure of will change in your non valid agreement. All agreements not valid, this is one of them stated in the agreement. You ask who I am; I am the executor, medical and financial power of attorney, child's guardian, trustee and all powers for Brady Nazarovich, and have been for many years. I had kept him alive in many death instances, kept his finances in order, and he and our family fed, clothed, housed and more for many years and was executor on his estate and buried him. Your non valid agreement procedure of change in will incurred expenses.

An Independent notary that worked with the same attorneys 3 2 1 Henderson Rcb., J G Wentworth arranged for to have your contract executed. The same contract that stated a change in beneficiary as well as NONE of this would be valid with no court approval. You wrote the contract. You included a change of his will. You arranged for attorney to execute all changes. You arranged for local attorneys to mail in this change of beneficiary upon arranging for people to change his will as stated in your non valid agreement. He - Brady - did not mail this in. He did not have a valid agreement with you to change his will. He was sick and not able to change his will back and later dead from his wounds. He did not mail this in. The attorney you arranged for to execute all agreements did so. AND this attorney was told that he was a very disabled man who had dependents and could not afford to sell his structured settlement by family and by the judge and court as per 2003 structured settlement protection laws. You arranged for local lawyers to execute your will, not legal, ignoring and illegal as per protection laws, then blame the sick disabled person when the same attorney goes ahead and executes parts of the invalid contract. He did not mail anything. He did not know these attorneys before your sending him there to execute your illegal contract. He did not live in San Diego city. He signed the same contract that stated NONE of this was legal without court approval. And in that contract was a change of his Will. These same people went ahead with that part of the non-valid contract, the same people that arranged the contract execution. .. the same people who were warned that this was not legal as per law. This change of beneficiary was only with the structured settlement company who's payments you were after. This portion of the non-valid agreement was plucked out and executed by the same people you referred Brady to sign that non valid contract. He understood from the court and judge that this total agreement also was not valid, as did you and as these San Diego people who were warned beforehand. IF some of this contract can be taken out and executed at will, as was done, why would you not be required to pay the money you promised? You arranged it all. These same people were warned it was not legal in his case, and proceeded with it all under the interests of your company, no one else. Sign here.. and here... done. I don't think so. Wait for court approval before starting various deeds stated in the - your - contract. Your arranged San Diego attorney , notary etc. did not wait for court approval as stated in and signed by both you - the company and Brady the disabled settlement payments owner. Your arranged offices of attorneys etc. proceeded with that part before agreement was legal. He understood that that part as well as all others were not valid as you sent him in the mail FED EX.

..... as well as; you state " the signature on the beneficiary change form was notarized by an independent Notary in San Diego, California."
How would you know that? What business was it of yours to have that information or be involved in it at all?

You cannot deny that your company went after a very disabled man with dependents ignoring the laws, would not leave this man alone, arranged for an attorney to execute your illegal contract denied by a judge, and by the way change of beneficiary and the same mailed these items, then you state, no big deal, "he could have changed it back" from your preferred Estate removing his beneficiary... sick and dying, then dead. Costs incurred to family to straighten it all out, and all the pain and suffering your sales people and agents caused. Your one way locked door policy on complaints. Your sales people ignore these laws and family begging for peace from relentless calls.

J G Wentworth ( Alias; 3 2 1 Henderson Rcb.s) You say you could not change the now dead man's beneficiary (remove family's names), But you DID in fact arrange for a client's attorney to process contracts (not a legal contract by Structured Settlement Protection laws, your company wrote this contract as well as stated a change of beneficiary would happen). Also as well as that same legal counsel arranged the stated change in beneficiary to be signed.. as your company signed and wrote in your contract. That attorney WAS notified of the illegal selling of a dying man's income he and dependents needed to survive. That attorney, and your relentless sales people ignored that fact and notifications. You pave your way through court also denied by a judge. But alas.. you already arranged for the "client's" attorney to get the sick persons signature on all aspects and he made sure some of that contract had been negotiated; "change of will, beneficiary", just in case your company needed to claim his estate for some reason after death. The court denied permission, and the contract states therefore that ALL agreements in the contract were Null and Void. I guess not the ones you made sure would happened before the court date. Just blame the sick guy. Ignore the laws to protect people, make all arrangements a sick man could not. Who cares if a large company takes all a family has? Who cares if fake "government" looking checks and prizes you mail lure some disabled person to make a call, cash a "Check", never to be left alone again? And you do not stop.. even denied, you continue to arrange to take more monies you say you have a legal right to in the mail. Perhaps a lot of lawyers do not face up to you yet.. but there is a people's court of opinion, and your behavior is unethical, and what you would like private, is now public.

Ms. Cheek has made the same complaint a number of times. We have responded a number of times, yet she refuses to accept our explanation. First, we did attempt to complete a transaction with Mr. Nazarovich, but it was denied by the court. We therefore have not received any of Mr. Nazarovich’s structured settlement annuity payments. We have not benefited in any way from Mr. Nazarovich’s structured settlement annuity. Mr. Nazarovich changed the beneficiary of his annuity to his Estate. Again, he did not change it to JG Wentworth and JG Wentworth has not benefited in any way from the beneficiary designation. The change of beneficiary had to be requested and authorized by Mr. Nazarovich. We cannot make that change by ourselves. If Mr. Nazarovich wanted to change the beneficiary again, after our transaction was denied by the court, he would have had to do that himself, we could not make that change. Ms. Cheek’s complaints have never made any sense, she constantly accuses us of any number of dastardly deeds, but as I have pointed out nothing happened in the attempted transaction with Mr. Nazarovich that has benefitted us, we were paid nothing, we will not receive any of his future structured settlement payments. We gained nothing from the attempted transaction. We gained nothing from the beneficiary change.

Your contract states a change in beneficiary and in doing so removes family beneficiary names on the annuity income you seek, costing a family probate and court fees to make things right after death.. the way they were before Brady met you. The lawyer you referred Brady to, to execute your contract states a change and arranges a change in Will. No, you got no money, but planned on it if need be or owed by stating a change in the will in your contract; it was to Estate in case you have a future claim in the Estate, and a cost to family money in court. (an original beneficiary would bypass courts and fees). You gained assurance in a beneficiary change (or why would you have a change stated a Will in your contract) for later purposes if need be or monies owed, your own reasons.
Yes, you were denied in court.. it should never have gotten to court.. as per Structured Settlement Protection laws your agents ignore and that is why you were denied permission to his income, at much cost to the dependents in court work and fees to straighten it back out. But then you repeated your efforts to get this man's income once again.
You are very self protecting in your ways of arranging all of this with "outside client Lawyers", all ready and versed in your procedures.
Every single person with your company or associated by referral by your company were relentless in continued efforts to ignore the facts of law and disability given them with Brady; a very disabled man with family who needed his income and could not afford to sell his income, so you could gain his income.
No contract court approved, no monies exchanged, it still cost the family in Court costs to remedy the Will change planned in the contract as well as the worry and suffering of family with relentless aggravation from company representatives ignoring facts, court dates and more. Your company previously responded ;Well, .."he could have changed his Will back". He was a very sick man and then dead.. He could not. Pay the Probate court costs and all the fees needed to pass through the court, that would have been avoided had Brady never met your company.

I have requested you provide your telephone number (J G Wentworth) as I cannot give up my number to your company again.

We have responded numerous times to these allegations, nothing new has been raised. We stand by our prior responses.

Seducing a known DISABLED for life patient to sell his needed monthly income, with dependents violates Structured Settlement Protection law, proceeding to have the dying man to Lawyers you suggested and referred to sign contracts written by you that also removes his beneficiaries from his account. Then he dies. Family must do the legal work to protect income as well as pay Probate court costs to correct those changes(made as per your contract)... and that includes medical bills from a very sick dying man. WOW. That's scary for any poor soul. BEWARE people.