Public Mediation

Imerlot Antione LLC-Dispute-#3190605

L. N. vs. Imerlot Antione Llc
6800 W Gate Blve Ste 132, Austin, Texas, 78745, United States
    • Status: In Negotiation
      This claim has posted for public comment and negotiation. It will remain posted until resolved to the claimant's satisfaction. Suggest a resolution to help these parties reach a settlement.
    • View response from: Imerlot Antione Llc
    • Claimant Seeks: 2 non-monetary items.
    • Claim #: 3190605
    • Amount Involved: 12,875.48
    • Filed On: Feb 17, 2013
    • Posted On: Feb 28, 2013
    • Complaint(s):
      • Bad business or marketing practices
      • Unfulfilled promises
      • Income loss
  • Review this case.
  • Propose your solution.
  • Win the reward (1,000)
Statement of Claim
Claimant says:
"Imerlot Antione LLC borrowed $8000.00 from me to assist and a project that never bore any fruit. There was a promise to return payment within 90 days. Initially he asked me to sign a confidentiality agreement of which I refused to do so and still have a copy of it as I have a copy of his signature on the check he cashed. After numerous attempts to get my money back he dropped off the face of the earth. Low and behold I later found out that he was driving an unregistered car. His full name is Maurice Antione Redwine. His mailing address is 6800 W Gate Blvd Austin, TX 78745 which is apparently run out of a UPS store as are other known addresses. He refused to give me my money back that I invested in his LLC. this was hard earned money with a promise of return According to bizpedia his LLC is in good standing. Yet he will not respond and pay due diligence of my money that was loaned in good faith of return"
Reply Have a similar problem?
  • 05-06-2011 — Beginning of loan period
  • 08-01-2011 — received statement from bank showing canceled check to Mr Maurince Redwine.
  • 06-20-2011 — email contacting Maurice Redwine for payment of loan
  • 10-21-2011 — contacted Maurice for payment
  • 10-24-2011 — response from Maurice stating he did not want to go to jail for not paying me my money back
  • 11-14-2011 — advising Maurice Redwine I would never stop trying to get my money back. have documentation of communication
  • 11-20-2011 — documented attempt to contact Maurice Redwine for repayment of loan
  • 12-21-2011 — documented conversation from Maurice Redwine indicating he would converse with me via Attorney concerning his repayment of loan. Conversation with his Attorney never surfaced
  • 12-22-2011 — Maurice asking me if I have an attorney and wanting a name and phone number if I have one. documented conversation available
  • 01-20-2012 — documented conversation from Maurice stating " I have never sided against an amicble resolution for this matter"
  • 01-28-2012 — documented request to Maurice Redwine requesting repayment of loan
  • 02-26-2012 — documented request to Maurice Redwine requesting repayment of loan
  • 09-08-2012 — documented conversation requesting repayment of loan
  • 09-18-2012 — documented request asking if Maurice Redwine has reached a decision on arrangements to repay my money. no arrangements had been made
  • 10-22-2012 — Advising Maurice I had given him every opportunity to respond and repay my money that was loaned to Imerlot Antoine L.L C.
Exhibits View
Additional Communication Between Claimant and Imerlot Antione Llc Hide
  • Feb 26, 2013, Imerlot Antione LLC (responding party) added:
  • This matter has been loosely reviewed, as critical events or accounts depicted by the Claimant are grossly misleading, omitted or inaccurate and false. Certainly, there is merit for contention, however iMerlot Antoine, LLC has made no contractual arrangement(s) with the Claimant, nor defaulted on any; and any inadvertent improprieties were borne of a personal nature- not business.

    This matter was initiated through personal affiliation. However depiction of monies "borrowed" and conditions of "return"/profit/loss were neither fraudulent, unreasonable, nor misleading in any regard.

    As a matter of substantiated opinion, the degradation of a personal relationship with the Claimant has, solely and completely, influenced this claim. There has never been a refusal of propriety by iMerlot Antoine, LLC, nor Maurice Antoine Redwine, who is the owner and founder of iMerlot Antoine, LLC. The only prerequisite to resolving this matter, from Maurice Antoine Redwine, has been an agreement of terms to, retroactively, but faithfully execute and outline responsibility or culmination of transactions. Given circumstance and conditions not disclosed herein (nor in the original claim), it is/was reasonable to assume that any payment made to the Claimant - in attempt to remedy a failed project pursuit involving financial risk - could constitute perceived grounds to pursue additional sums. It has only been requested, by Maurice Antoine Redwine, that an agreement be retroactively introduced to guard against a perpetuated suggestion of monies owed.

    Ostensibly, it is understood that contractual obligations for any agreement involving financial transactions should be introduced prior to the transaction. Nevertheless, such an agreement (along with a pre-made confidentiality agreement referenced by the Claimant) was discussed but declined due to the friendship that was intact. Ingeminating, failing to enact an agreement, first, is largely improper- lending credence to the actuality of this matter being borne by a personal relationship, and not business. An agreement was mulled between the Claimant and Maurice Antoine Redwine, but was not responsibly pursued by Maurice Antoine Redwine. This is an acknowledged fault made lucid by a resulting "claim" that would be considered embarrassing and disappointing were not the accounts within the claim fright with omissions, misleads and some inaccuracies.

    It is understood that the Claimant is incensed. However, whether tardy or timely, pursuit of propriety will be insisted upon before concession to such a claim be recognized.

    Previous requests to place, in writing, an agreement for which a personal relationship induced a financial transaction has been sought from the Claimant since initial contention. Should the Claimant elect to revisit this request, dialogue for resolution can be productive.

    Any faults of Maurice Antoine Redwine, as a business owner is not to be contorted as fault borne by iMerlot Antoine, LLC. This matter was ginned from a personal friendship, and will be resolved, likewise.

    Via this forum, an additional, personal offer to find resolution with the Claimant will be pursued. Without written acknowledgement of terms, however, no resolution will be considered. This is a stance that has been maintained, and will continue.

  • Feb 26, 2013, Claiming party added:
  • This will be made public on the 28th despite your plea. You owe the money and will pay it back immediately.

  • Feb 26, 2013, Claiming party added:
  • The fact remains the same that Imerlot Antoine LLC is responsible for the entire balance of the loan of the cancelled check that was made out to Imerlot Antione LLC and not personally to Maurice Antione Redwine. It was made out directly to the company and it is due and past due. Immediate payment of the money is expected. The gaudiness of assuming that this was a friendship deal is absurd. Friends to not treat friend as such and it is expected that immediate payment be given. There is no misunderstanding of either party that this was a loan and is due, past due. The fact that it was told by the other party that the money was to be used for a project that involved Toyota and a "so called" race to televise is false and misleading. I have proof and documented conversations that he knows and has known that the money is owed. Maurice Antione Redwine is attempting to cover his false pretenses and motivations of extortion of money from single women. I remain firm on what is due and there shall be no personal resolve of this matter. Final note, I am not bound by any agreement in any sort or fashion. More documentation will follow.

  • Feb 26, 2013, Claiming party added:
  • Attached is additional information that was captured and posted on the internet from another said party that had written in her diary of the preposterous, false and misleading person that Maurice Antione Redwine is and how he has proposed to run his company based off of unsuspecing women. The fact remains the same that the check was made out to Imerlot Antione LLC. This attempt is not the first attempt he has made. The money is due. The next posting of documents will be the cancelled check written to the company and documentation from the IRA in which it was taken from.

  • Feb 26, 2013, Claiming party added:
  • Word Copy of the bogus confidentiality agreement that was not signed therefore provides every right to make public any type of agreement that was strickly business related. If the transaction were a friend relation of nature the check would have not been made to the company. The company is liable as is Maurice Antione Redwine

  • Feb 27, 2013, Imerlot Antione LLC (responding party) added:
  • While merit of various expressions will be disputed, the right to express your perspective is supported by iMerlot Antoine, LLC, as well as Maurice Antoine Redwine.

  • Feb 27, 2013, Imerlot Antione LLC (responding party) added:
  • Regardless of resolution, I, also, welcome you to interview/communicate with the individual you referenced with the "diary"- of your own volition and terms with that individual.

  • Feb 27, 2013, Imerlot Antione LLC (responding party) added:
  • It is not the intention of Maurice Antoine Redwine to prevent public disclosure of that which has occurred in actuality. All deeds and intentions are considered as actions to surface in light.

    Were matters, herein, considered fair and true, effort to conceal and settle would be made. Grim and disturbing this claim is, but accuracy, conjecture, responsibility and proper accountability will be the end result.

    Without volley to sully the Claimant's cause with sensitive and salacious detail, culmination will be sought in fairness to allocate appropriate accountability.

  • Feb 27, 2013, Claiming party added:
  • The accountability of the actions displayed by Imerlot Antione LLC are yet to be seen. There have been numerous attempts in the past year and a half to settle this matter and it has yet to be settled. Due to the impact that has affected my retirement fund it is considered Imerlot Antione LLC is getting off lightly by ONLY being required to pay me the entire amount that has been requested. In fact, the end result had the money remained in the IRA it would have drawn a considerable amount more money than the 33.3% interest that is being sought and considerably a generous attempt to settle. This claim however, if not settled will be grounds of a courthouse appearance at the expense of Imerlot Antione LLC and the amount owed will be subjected to review by my financial advisor to seek the full entire amount of monies that would have been accumulated in the IRA stock market and the market value today plus any taxes and penalties thereof that were incurred and paid by myself. Negligence on behalf of Imerlot Antione LLC should be closely examined by the Attorney Generals Office, of which this claim will be filed appropriately and in a timely manner.

  • Mar 03, 2013, Claiming party added:
  • Once again he has attempted to hide the fact that he is a fraud by creating yet another fake website. On this website he also challenges you to spend money to get his information. http://companies.findthecompany.com/l/23996737/Imerlot-Antoine-Llc-in-Austin-TX

    one thing I find interesting is the fact that he thinks he can keep duping people. The link for background check is just that a link. I was able to find credible information from Austin, where he supposedly lives and has an office. Truth be told his "so called" office is a UPS mail box that he forwards his mail to and from here in Texas. Attached is a list of warrants and are of public viewing if you find the right spot to get the information. Ironically he is wanted for lack of financial responsibility.

  • Mar 03, 2013, Imerlot Antione LLC (responding party) added:
  • This will be a final posting on this site, from Maurice Antoine Redwine/iMerlot Antoine, LLC.

    The link referenced (website) was not created by iMerlot Antoine, LLC, nor Maurice Antoine Redwine, nor any affiliates.

    It is highly recommended that higher authorities are contacted regarding the information, just as Maurice Antoine Redwine will be instructed to do- resultant of the information provided.

    Your original terms of settlement were misunderstood due to lacking attention. The Counteroffer, herein, was not intended to ignore request for payment with interest and/or fees. It was an oversight. If this matter can be resolved via this site, Maurice Antoine Redwine will acquiesce with the same, intended conditions before: 1) $8,000 plus interest/fees per your request; 2) Arrangement to review/disclose facts and authorized productions of iMerlot Antoine, LLC/Maurice Antoine Redwine; 3) Written agreement of terms to conclude this matter.

    Should desire to keep posted material remain, only inaccurate matters will be sought after, for correction through legal means. Subsequent to agreement, there will be no request to remove accurate information posted.

    If this is an amenable offer, the task the Claimant, to initiate an amended proposal to include abilities to accommodate aforementioned conditions.

  • Mar 07, 2013, Claiming party added:
  • The only agreement that I will consider and has not been accepted is the $8000 plus the interest accrued. There have been no inaccurate postings to this claim and Maurice Antione Redwine is fully aware that it is all said and true. Once an agreement of my original terms is accepted I will remove this and only after entire payment is made. He has had two years to pay it back.

What Claimant Wants Hide
1. Payment due: Money loaned Mar 04, 2013 $8,000.00
2. Pay me interest $4,875.48
Cash total : $12,875.48
  • 0
Do you agree with the claimant’s demands?  (If you are a party to this claim, click here.)
Respondent's Counteroffer Hide
What By When How Much
1. Agreement to Pay $8,000 Mar 14, 2013 N/A
2. Space/Venue to Communicate Grievances/Concerns Mar 14, 2013 N/A
Non-cash: 2 items
  • 0
Do you agree with the respondent’s Response?  (If you are a party to this claim, click here.)
Offer History
Feb 26, 2013
Imerlot Antione LLC's counter offer to Claimant
Refresh
  • Show:
  • Sort by:
  • Comment: by Claimant On: 02-26-2013
  • payment due
Get fast access to our Resolver community, for...
  • help with a PeopleClaim or any other complaint
  • assistance with a purchase or contract
  • expert advice
Other PeopleClaim resolvers
Get Free alerts when claims post in your area.
Get Alert

Need help resolving a dispute? Learn more.

Public Mediation

The shortest path from your problem to its resolution.
1
Peer to Peer

Engage the other party and use powerful tools to negotiate the best resolution.

Free
If Unresolved
2
Community Resolution

Post your case online and get help from legal professionals, industry experts, consumers & advocates competing to find the best resolution to your claim.

$14.99 + optional reward for best resolution
Full refund if not resolved to your satisfaction
If Unresolved
3
Private Mediation

Lets you mediate your case privately with the help of our professional mediators and industry experts.

Free to claimant. Mediator fees negotiable.
If Unresolved
4
Engage a Professional

Find the best community-reviewed professionals near you to resolve your issue in private online mediation or traditional court/mediation.

Resolution

A wonderful serenity has taken possession of my entire soul, like these sweet mornings of spring which I enjoy with my whole heart.

I am (not) alone, and I feel the charm of existence in this spot, which was created for the bliss of souls like mine...~ Goethe

Get a public verdict — create an online trial $50 public trial / $50 reward for successful resolution
Important: All information contained herein is the opinion of the posting parties, who are solely responsible for its content. PeopleClaim offers both free and paid services to help consumers, patients, employee, tenants, and others resolve disputes without lawyers or courts, through negotiated online settlement and public disclosure of wrongdoing or unfair treatment.
Claims against parties operating under bankruptcy protection, by law must be processed solely through the appropriate US bankruptcy court. Any claims against this party currently posted on PeopleClaim are available for purposes of public business review only and are not an attempt to collect money or recover assets subject to protections under the United States Bankruptcy Code.
*IMPORTANT: PeopleClaim is a public dispute resolution system, independent of the BBB, small claims court, or other dispute resolution services. PeopleClaim is not a law firm and does not provide legal services, opinions, or advice. PeopleClaim facilitates peer-to-peer negotiation and resolution and crowdsourced input on issues of fairness to help resolve complaints. Users should contact professional legal counsel on any matters of law or regulation regarding their claims. PeopleClaim does not review or evaluate the merits of claims submitted through its site, and users are solely responsible for all content filed in their claims.
© reserved by PeopleClaim