Public Mediation

Bay Media Star Inc Dispute

Y. L. vs. Bay Media Star Inc
42285 Osgood Road, Freemont, California, 94539, United States
    • Status: In Negotiation
      This claim has posted for public comment and negotiation. It will remain posted until resolved to the claimant's satisfaction. Suggest a resolution to help these parties reach a settlement.
    • View response from: Bay Media Star Inc
    • Claimant Seeks: View.
    • Claim #: 1343496
    • Amount Involved: 1,090.28
    • Filed On: Jul 03, 2014
    • Posted On: Jul 14, 2014
    • Complaint(s):
      • Bad business practices
      • Customer service runarounds
      • "I just feel ripped off."
  • Review this case.
  • Propose your solution.
  • Win the reward (1,000)
Statement of Claim
Claimant says:
"On June 21, 2014, Mr. Zhe Zhao, senior sales, from Bay Media Star Inc. (BMS) had an information booth in front of Marina Food supermarket, which is located at 10122 Bandley Dr, Cupertino, CA 95014. I was shopping in the store around noon. I made an inquiry about Chinese TV programs he was marketing. Mr. Zhao told me I had to subscribe one English program in order to add a Chinese program and I had to subscribe Comcast internet service in order to receive a promotion deal. He recommended to me Preferred Choice, MandarinDirect III, and Blast Internet Service with the price tags as follows:

• Preferred Choice – $14.99/m (1-12 mo) and $19.99/m (13-24 mo);
• MandarinDirect III – $16.99/m (1-24 mo);
• Blast Internet – $39.99/m (1-3 mo) and $49.99/m (4-24 mo);
• HBO+Starz+Showtime – free (1-3 mo); cancel or pay fee (4-24 mo).
He took my name, home address and phone number and gave me his business card, where he wrote down his cell number for me to call if I have any questions. He promised that he would get back to me within a day or two.
I did not hear from him for a couple of days. On June 25, 2014, I called his office at 925-833-6000 listed in his business card and received a message that the phone was no longer in service. I then called his cell at 510-598-5509 and Mr. Zhao answered. He retook the information from me and ordered an installation on the following day, June 26, 2014. A technician came and installed the dish/wire and an HD receiver. Before he left, the technician gave me an estimated first month’s bill of $41.98 for DirecTV service. In the evening I noticed $41.98 be posted in my credit card account.
Two days later, I received an itemized billing statement from DirecTV. The billing statement made me realize that Mr. Zhao
• failed to disclose to me that Preferred Choice will be $45.99/m (13-24 mo) and
• failed to disclose to me that there is a Primary TV fee of $6.00/m.
As a result, my monthly bill (13-24 mo) from DirecTV will be $32/m higher than what Mr. Zhao promised to me on June 21, 2014.
The internet service bill I received also demonstrates that Mr. Zhao
• failed to disclose to me the internet service fee will be $77.95/m (13-24 mo), which will be $27.94/m higher than what Mr. Zhao promised to me on June 21, 2014;
• failed to disclose to me there is an HIS National SIK Charge Kit of $15 (I have never received this Kit); and
• failed to disclose to me there is a CHSI Change of Service fee of $5.00.

On July 1, 2014, I called Mr. Zhao’s cell phone. After brief discussion, he agreed to personally reimburse me for the Charge Kit of $15.00 and instructed that I pick up $15.00 in his office (I live about 30 miles away from his office). At the same time, he notified me that if I take $15.00, I am no longer allowed to call his cell and that he would transfer my account to another sale person but refused to disclose the person’s name and phone number to me. I then requested that he disclose BMS business address and his supervisor’s name, which he spelled out as follows:

Bay Media Star (BMS) Inc.
42285 Osgood Road
Freemont, CA 94539

Jack, office hour from10:30 -7:00 PM

I informed Mr. Zhao that I would visit BMS headquarter at the address he gave to me the next day (July 2, 2014) and meet with his supervisor during the business hours.
On July 2, 2014 about 4:45 PM, I arrived at BMS’s headquarter at 42285 Osgood Road, Freemont, CA 94539. I delivered a letter addressing the BMS Management Team, which outlines what I was told by Mr. Zhao and what Mr. Zhao failed to disclose to me when he switched me from my existing internet/tv services to the internet/tv services he prepared for me. Four staff members working in the office at the time refused to receive the letter I personally delivered to them. When I asked to see “Jack”, I was told nobody named “Jack” works there. I then asked to see any management member. A gentleman self introduced to me as “Jeff” showed up. He told me that none of the managers was in the office and none of them would return to the office by the end of the day. I informed him that I would wait until the end of the day. Later Mr. Edward Wong, Marketing & Sales Director, showed up. He told me his boss is BME’s CEO and he is No. 2 in BME. I explained to him, for example, the new internet service I was switched to by Mr. Zhao does not make any sense: My existing internet service was $49.99/m (I showed him my billing statements) and this rate was guaranteed FOREVER as long as I stayed with the same service. With the switch to the new service, I would pay $39.99/m (1-3 mo) (saving $30.00 total less Exchange Kit of $15.00; the net saving is $15.00) as compared to my existing service fee of $49.99/m); $49.99/m (4-12 mo) (same as my existing service fee of $49.99/m); $77.95/m (13-24 ms) ($27.94/m higher as compared to my existing service fee of $49.99/m.)
Mr. Wong promised that if anytime that my bills be higher than I was promised for the 24 months of period, I could go to him and he would make an effort to switch me to new promotion programs. I asked him how he could do that since the services Mr. Zhao switched me to require 24 mo commitment. I asked him to put his promise in writing, which he refused. I then gave him the letter I wrote to the management team and asked him to read it himself and acknowledge that he receive it. Mr. Wong refused to do so. I told him I would make a note showing that BMS refused to receive the letter I personally delivered to its office. Mr. Wong said “You cannot prove that you personally delivered the letter because I will deny it." I responded “If we go to the court, you will be required to make that statement under the oath.” That was my last word.
I then went to a neighborhood office and asked a business owner/employee working there to be my witness. This is what I got:
I, xxx, witnessed xxx was at xxx (business) of Freemont on July 2nd, 2014 at 6:15 PM. Drove a black car with license xxx confirmed was her vehicle. Dated July 2nd, 2014 at the address of 42xxx Osgood, Fremont, CA 94536.

I demand BMS pay
1. $26.00/m (extra direcTV fee) x 12 (13-24 mo) = $312.
2. $6.00/m (primary TV fee) x 23 (2-24 mo) = $138
3. $27.94/m (extra internet fee) x 12 (13-24 mo) = $335.28
4. $15.00 (exchange kit fee)
5. $5.00 (CHSI change of service fee) x 23 (2-24 mo) = $115
Total: $915.28, payable to me by July 18, 2014."
Reply Have a similar problem?
Additional Communication Between Claimant and Bay Media Star Inc Hide
  • Jul 06, 2014, Claiming party added:
  • The following is a supplement to the original claim:

    All the promotions listed in the flier that Mr. Zhao distributed to me on June 21, 2014 EXPIRED ON OCTOBER 2, 2013 (see attached); the business address listed on the flier is NOT A VALID BUSINESS ADDRESS OF BMS as of June 21, 2014; the office number of 925-833-6000 listed on Mr. Zhao's business card was “NOT IN SERVICE” when I contacted him on June 24, 2014; and Mr. Zhao notified me on July 2, 2014 that I NO LONGER BE ALLOWED TO CALL HIS CELL PHONE NUMBER with which he personally wrote down on his business card on June 21, 2014 for me to contact him.

    BMS started my service with DirecTV on June 25, 2014. I, however, have been denied access to any of MandarinDirect III program I have subscribed since June 25, 2014. In addition, I have been denied access to 32 out of 64 TV channels that are included in the Preferred Choice package that I have subscribed since June 25, 2014 because those channels are either "not available" or "signal loss." In another word, I have been paying 100% of the service I was sold into while I can only get access to 25% of the service since June 25, 2014.

    If you were or are Bay Media Star's former or current customers and had or have had similar experience(s) with BMS as I have, please contact me IMMEDIATELY. Together we may send our complaint to regulatory and watchdog organizations that oversee industries, professions, or activities relevant to our claim. If needed, we may file a class action against BMS in a state and/or a federal court and we shall demand the BMS to pay any and all of our legal fees.

  • Jul 14, 2014, Claiming party added:
  • Supplement (2) to the original claim filed on July 3, 2014.

    Between June 25 to July 8, 2014, I spent hours everyday talking to DirecTV tech support team for I could not get any access to MandarinDirect III nor 50% of the channels in Preferred Choice program that I have subscribed. After more than 10 days of direct communications with the tech support team, DirecTV finally asked me how many dishes Bay Media Star (BMS) had installed for me. I told them “One”. They told me that BMS should have installed two dishes: one is for Preferred Choice and the other is for International programs such as MandarinDirect III.

    On July 9, 2014 DirecTV sent a technician to install a 2nd dish for me. Immediately I gained an access to all the channels in MandarinDirect III program. As for the non-access to 50% of Preferred Choice program, the technician told me BMS did not use all the new equipment/parts in installing the dish. He replaced the used equipment/parts with the new ones and immediately I had access to all the channels in Preferred Choice program. His advice: If you want to order DirecTV services, go to DirecTV directly because DirecTV only uses new equipment/parts and never uses used equipment/parts.

    On July 6, 2014, I was shopping at 99 Ranch Market located at 338 Barber Lane, Milpitas, CA 95035. I noticed a BMS’ marketing station inside of the store. I asked a representative working there to give me an estimate of the package that I may be interested in: MandarinDirect III and Preferred Choice. After I secured his estimate in writing, I repeatedly asked him whether there were any hidden charges and/or any extra cost in addition to what was written on the paper. He assured me that his estimate covered everything. I appointed out to him that he failed to disclose HSI National SIK Charge Kit of $15.00 and CHSI Change of Service of $5.00, just like his colleague Mr. Zhao did.

    On my visit to Bay Media Star’s new headquarter in Fremont on July 2, 2014, a lady in the office told me that I should not be worried about the higher price for the 2nd year DirecTV service because at the end of the first year, BMS will change my subscription from Preferred Choice (currently on promotion $14.99/m for 12 months) to Basic Choice which is always $15.99/m. I responded “The lower price results from the downgraded service /program of Basic Choice not from a promotion for the existing service/program of Preferred Choice that I have.”

    If you read this claim and have a question about your own service through BMS, you may contact me at jenniferlu38@gmail.com. Together, we may prevent more consumers/customers from becoming victims of BMS’s misrepresentation of their services/products.


What Claimant Wants Hide
1. Recovery of Losses: 1. $26.00/m (extra direcTV fee) x 12 (13-24 mo) = $312; 2. $6.00/m (primary TV fee) x 23 (2-24 mo) = $138; 3. $27.94/m (extra internet fee) x 12 (13-24 mo) = $335.28; 4. $15.00 (exchange kit fee); and 5. $5.00 (CHSI change of service fee) x 23 (2-24 mo) = $115. Jul 18, 2014 $915.28
2. Pay me for my time: 5 hours at a rate of $35/hr Jul 18, 2014 $175.00
3. Other – Pay for claim posting cost Jul 18, 2014 $7.99
Cash total : $1,098.27
  • 0
Do you agree with the claimant’s demands?  (If you are a party to this claim, click here.)
Respondent's Counteroffer Hide
The claimant's settlement terms were rejected with no explanation. This claim will remain posted until resolved.
  • 0
Do you agree with the respondent’s Response?  (If you are a party to this claim, click here.)
Get fast access to our Resolver community, for...
  • help with a PeopleClaim or any other complaint
  • assistance with a purchase or contract
  • expert advice
Other PeopleClaim resolvers
Get Free alerts when claims post in your area.
Get Alert

Need help resolving a dispute? Learn more.

Public Mediation

The shortest path from your problem to its resolution.
1
Peer to Peer

Engage the other party and use powerful tools to negotiate the best resolution.

Free
If Unresolved
2
Community Resolution

Post your case online and get help from legal professionals, industry experts, consumers & advocates competing to find the best resolution to your claim.

$14.99 + optional reward for best resolution
Full refund if not resolved to your satisfaction
If Unresolved
3
Private Mediation

Lets you mediate your case privately with the help of our professional mediators and industry experts.

Free to claimant. Mediator fees negotiable.
If Unresolved
4
Engage a Professional

Find the best community-reviewed professionals near you to resolve your issue in private online mediation or traditional court/mediation.

Resolution

A wonderful serenity has taken possession of my entire soul, like these sweet mornings of spring which I enjoy with my whole heart.

I am (not) alone, and I feel the charm of existence in this spot, which was created for the bliss of souls like mine...~ Goethe

Get a public verdict — create an online trial $50 public trial / $50 reward for successful resolution
Important: All information contained herein is the opinion of the posting parties, who are solely responsible for its content. PeopleClaim offers both free and paid services to help consumers, patients, employee, tenants, and others resolve disputes without lawyers or courts, through negotiated online settlement and public disclosure of wrongdoing or unfair treatment.
Claims against parties operating under bankruptcy protection, by law must be processed solely through the appropriate US bankruptcy court. Any claims against this party currently posted on PeopleClaim are available for purposes of public business review only and are not an attempt to collect money or recover assets subject to protections under the United States Bankruptcy Code.
*IMPORTANT: PeopleClaim is a public dispute resolution system, independent of the BBB, small claims court, or other dispute resolution services. PeopleClaim is not a law firm and does not provide legal services, opinions, or advice. PeopleClaim facilitates peer-to-peer negotiation and resolution and crowdsourced input on issues of fairness to help resolve complaints. Users should contact professional legal counsel on any matters of law or regulation regarding their claims. PeopleClaim does not review or evaluate the merits of claims submitted through its site, and users are solely responsible for all content filed in their claims.
© reserved by PeopleClaim