Public Negotiation

PeopleClaim public mediations with co-plaintiffs are similar to class actions except they're resolved with the help of our community of conflict resolution professionals.

Public mediations with co-plaintiffs may be resolved globally — one offer to all parties — or individually via party-to-party negotiation with each separate claim.

While the goal is to help you find the shortest distance between a problem and its resolution, unresolved public mediations may be referred for formal legal represenatation and class action.

Community-negotiated settlement
Recover damages online
See if you qualify

Cornell University Health Fees

Plaintiff
Cornell University has implemented a policy of charging a $350 "health fee" to students who opt out of the university health insurance.

Under the Affordable Care Act, students must have insurance, but making those already covered pay an extra fee to skip the school's policy is unfair.
vs.
David Skorton - President Cornell University

If you're a named party in this case you're invited to add an opening statement.

In the absence of a statement from named party(s), PeopleClaim may assign an advocate to provide an opening statement and represent their interests.


Sort by:
    • [-][+]My resolution
    • 4 years ago
    Lauren W. (Neutral)
    As a student I think that you have a good argument, and I personally know of Universities that allow students to opt out of their health care program (for free). for example, If a student already has a healthcare plan they go to a website (the school provides the link) enter in their current health information, and they are opted out. Students do this once a year for the entire time they are in school. The school even sets a deadline for the students to have it done before the school year starts that way when one registers it taken off their bill. (Most Universities let students add charges (books, meal plans, housing) after the school year has started, so if one ever needed to add insurance, after opting out, they could.
      • [-][+]My resolution
      • 12 Points
      • 4 years ago
      Shaneisha W. (Neutral)
      Rather than issuing an extra fee of $350 to students already enrolled in a health insurance policy outside of the university's health insurance, which comes off as a punishment to students who choose not to receive the university's plan, the university should issue a neutral policy that affects students insured using either the university's or an outside provider for health insurance. As Brian W. suggested, the purpose for the fee is probably to encourage more students to enroll in the school's plan, however, how the university is going about this is quite troublesome. The most important issue should be whether the entire student body is insured, regardless as to by whom.

      One route that you can go as to trying to find a solution is to go to your student representatives on your campus and express your concerns, as I am sure that you are not the only person who feels this way. Ask your representatives what you can do, as well, to work to find a solution that would benefit both the student body, as well as the university. Many times, a petition showing the university how much support is behind an issue is enough to make an institution look over things
        • [-][+]My resolution
        • 4 years ago
        Brian W. (Neutral)
        For the sake of argument, I will assume that Cornell University administration needs to raise funds for the Gannett medical facility. While there would be several options available to them - e.g., a fee for all students, higher fee for services used, increased tuition, seeking additional donations, etc., - they have elected to charge a fee to those students who do not participate in their Student Health Insurance Plan (SHIP). I would guess by this action that their goal is to encourage more students to enroll in SHIP, but the resultant perception is that it unfairly punishes those who do not. Vice President for Student and Academic Services Susan Murphy has stated that everyone will now participate in supporting campus health and that among the goals are for affordable care and equitable access. I think there are other ways to achieve these goals that might be received as a fairer solution. I propose: 1- that fees for services be increased 5% - placing a slightly higher burden on students who use Gannett, but still affordable, 2 - that the remainder of the increase needed be charged as a "student health fee," distributed equally among students who participate in SHIP and those who do not (a flat fee that all pay, presumably less than $350), and 3 - that the University engage in a targeted fund raising effort to solicit donations for Gannett, which will be used half to replenish reserves and repay debt and the other half returned as a refund to students (in equal amounts to all) to offset the "student health fee."
          • [-][+]My resolution
          • 4 years ago
          Who K. (Neutral)
          Repeal Obamacare – Repeal Obamacare to end all the damage it's doing.
            • [-][+]My resolution – Plaintiff
            • 4 years ago
            Tihomir L. (Plaintiff-unverified)
            Cancel policy of requiring fee and an apology to the student body.
            Start a timeline for this case

            Suggest an event.

            PeopleClaim is a pre-litigation negotiation platform that allows parties to combine claims against counterparties in order to negotiate group or individual settlements that avoid litigation, increase recovery amounts, and settle cases more constructively. The process does not requre a lawyer or legal representation and does not carry the force of law. Read more...
            How public mediation works

            Lead plaintiff opens case

            Join a case or start your own.
            Any type. Large or small.

            Case grows as others join

            Get the power of numbers.
            Bigger is better.

            Public helps negotiate fair resolution

            Legal and industry pros, consumer advocates, and others help find the best resolution.

            Respondent settles

            Join a group settlement or negotiate peer-to-peer.

            Unresolved cases escalate

            Connect with top lawyers and negotiatiors if you need more help.

            Why join this case?
            • Recover damages
            • Increase negotiating leverage
            • Keep more of your settlement
            • Fast and simple
            Get help from our experts.
            Invite up to three members of our resolution community to help get your dispute resolved.

            Join our justice community to help people who need your advice and services.

            Join now
            © reserved by PeopleClaim

            Important: PeopleClaim is a public dispute resolution system providing claim filing and online "trials" to settle party-to-party disputes and engage discussion in matters of public interest or controversy. PeopleClaim is not a court of law, and decisions arrived at through PeopleClaim trials do not legally bind disputing parties unless by mutual agreement. Terms such as "court," "trial," "verdict," "plaintiff," "respondent," "advocate," "neutral," "argument," "rebuttal," and other words borrowed from law are not used in their technical legal sense and should not be interpreted as such. The goal of PeopleClaim Online Trials is to increase public participation in dispute resolution and public policy by airing, debating, and seeking resolutions to matters of public interest as well as commercial disputes.

            Parties participating in PeopleClaim trials have the option to resolve their disputes through mutual consent, under terms proposed by other trial participants such as "advocates," "neutrals," and others. PeopleClaim does not enforce any such agreements or promise any outcome to trials hosted on its site. PeopleClaim is not responsible for content posted in either public trials or in party-to-party claims registered at PeopleClaim.com. All trial content, including case summaries, rebuttals, suggested resolutions, and comments, are solely the responsibility of the posting parties.PeopleClaim does not review or evaluate the merits of opinions posted on its site by trial participants or others.

            PeopleClaim is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or legal services.