Resolve a dispute - It's FREE

Find complaint histories for businesses, professionals, and anyone else:

  • Help resolve a dispute:
  • Review the case
  • Propose your solution
  • Win the reward.

Showing 4 matches for Princess Cruises:

“Tal Memran vs. Princess Cruise Line”

  • Claim Status:
  • In Negotiation
  • Posted on: May 25,2019

Complaint Types: I just feel ripped off., This feels like a scam to me., Bad business practices, Contract / Agreement dispute, Customer service runarounds, Failure to disclose facts, Failure to honor promises, Poor Value for Money, Problem with a service

Claimant says: "On October 20th, 2018, my family and I whom consist of 2 young children went on a 15 day cruise to Hawaii with the Star Princess. We had the most traumatic experience of our lives. My husband went into the bathroom and saw blood everywhere, and we later found out that someone was brutally beaten to death on our ship. A chopper had to land on our deck to take the guy to the nearest hospital in Honolulu. Someone was murdered on our ship and we were scared out of our minds for our children???s safety for the durati” ...Show more »

Claimant Seeks: $54000

“Clifford Rabourn vs. Princess Cruise Line”

  • Claim Status:
  • In Negotiation
  • Posted on: September 04,2017

Complaint Types: Bad business practices, Problem with a service

Claimant says: "On July 11, 2017 my spouse and I booked a cruise with Princess Cruise Lines.  The cruise was for a February 6, 2018 cruise on the Carribbean Princess.  At that time we made a good faith $200.00 non refundable deposit. At no time were we advised, prior to booking, that there were known issues with the ship.  On August 23, 2017 we received an email from Princess Lines stating that the original itinerary was being modified because of technical and propulsion issues with the ship.  The mod” ...Show more »

Claimant Seeks: $214.99

“Princess Cruises Inc-Dispute-#3882263”

  • Claim Status:
  • In Negotiation
  • Posted on: April 04,2012

Complaint Types: Bad business practices, bait with one price and switch on booking

Claimant says: "have sailed with Norwegian,royal Caribbean, and Carnival-so I am a seasoned cruiser. Have not used princess cruises before. Received a brochure from them. read 14 days Hawaiian islands-interior was 1445-now 1299-no expiration date no other qualifying notes,no other notes except fares may increase for taxes and government fees up to 85.00. I called to book and was told that that promotion was not running. It was now 1445.00-explained what I was looking at. She explained that is was probably not running that promotion.(v” ...Show more »

Claimant Seeks: $0

“Princess Cruises, An Irresponsible Cruise Line”

  • Claim Status:
  • In Negotiation
  • Posted on: December 29,2011

Complaint Types: Bad business practices

Claimant says: "On February 9, 2010, my wife and I boarded the Diamond Princess in Auckland, New Zealand, bound for Melbourne and Sydney, Australia. Booking No. XT9Q3D On the morning of February 18, 2010, while still at sea and on the Diamond Princess, I ate breakfast at the Horizon Court buffet, and I subsequently became ill, with a stomachache and diarrhea. I had eaten only food prepared and served on the Diamond Princess. Before eating breakfast I felt fine and I was in good health. After I became ill my wife and I stayed” ...Show more »

Claimant Seeks: $6058.59


*
PeopleClaim provides cost-efficient, self-directed online dispute resolution services for consumers, businesses and others. The information contained in any of the claims listed above or elsewhere on this site represents the opinion of the claiming party, and is not intended as a statement of actual fact or evidence of any wrongdoing. The responding party is invited to contest, comment, or otherwise respond to any statements made by the claiming party.

Respondents have the option to post publicly any rebuttal or clarification or to communicate privately with the claiming party any concerns, denials, or clarification regarding the matters addressed in this claim. Failure of a responding party to communicate any such concerns should not necessarily be viewed as admission or agreement to statements made by the claimant.