Resolve a dispute - It's FREE

Find complaint histories for businesses, professionals, and anyone else:

  • Help resolve a dispute:
  • Review the case
  • Propose your solution
  • Win the reward.

Claim type with most consumer complaints —
Unreasonable rent increase:

“A.S. vs. Summit Apartments”

  • Claim Status:
  • In Negotiation
  • Posted on: May 18,2018

Complaint Types: Discrimination, Failure to repair/replace basic household utilities, Refusal to refund rent deposit, Rent raised without notice, Unreasonable rent increase, Violation of privacy

Claimant says: "The Summit Apartments kept my security deposit of $550.  Amy, the assitant, told me via telephone that I have a credit of $50 on my account.  Jennifer, the manager, sent me a letter from the leasing office that I have a credit of $103 on my account.  They kept all of this money that they stated is on my account.  A credit in total of $703.  They refused to provide me with a payment history of my account for the past three years, as well.”

Claimant Seeks: $703

“H.L. vs. Olen Properties Corp”

  • Claim Status:
  • In Negotiation
  • Posted on: October 16,2017

Complaint Types: Failure to maintain premises, Unfulfilled promises, Unreasonable rent increase

Claimant says: "I reside in a property managed by Olen Properties in Summerlin - Las Vegas, NV. I have resided there for over 5 years. I cannot get the onsite manager to return my calls, or communicate with me to resolve issues and work orders relating to the unit. She is the 4th onsite manager since I've lived there. Problem: They are trying to tell me a slow leak that they didn't repair years ago (they simply painted over the water stain) is now tenant negligence and failure to report and I must pay for the repair and ” ...Show more »

Claimant Seeks: $54.97

“Paul Tomasewski vs. James H. Templin Jr”

  • Claim Status:
  • In Negotiation
  • Posted on: April 13,2016

Complaint Types: Failure to maintain premises, Failure to repair/replace basic household utilities, Refusal to refund rent deposit, Unreasonable rent increase

Claimant says: "UNresolved disputed deductions of security deposit ... amounting to $721.31”

Claimant Seeks: $1232.29

“Alpine Village Condominium Dispute”

  • Claim Status:
  • In Negotiation
  • Posted on: December 02,2014

Complaint Types: Personal injury, Unreasonable rent increase

Claimant says: "Management of Alpine Village Condominium sent a letter to me and my husband as Owners of Week 41, lot 1, Unit ll Alpine Village that the Board of Directors has voted to add a special assessment of $696.00 for each of the next 4 years beginning May 1,2014. They also told us we could not use our timeshare unit in 2014 unless the special assessment was paid by May 1,2014 .This was even though we have paid our regular annual dues. This has caused us mental hardship as we could not make any plans for our vacation this year. ” ...Show more »

Claimant Seeks: $10721.97

“The Marshall Hotel-Dispute-#3858156”

  • Claim Status:
  • In Negotiation
  • Posted on: October 07,2012

Complaint Types: Property damage or loss, Refusal to refund rent deposit, Unreasonable rent increase

Claimant says: "I was evicted from room 318 of the Marshall Hotel on July 24, 2012, 9 days prior to the next due date of my rent. I had lived in that room for more that 25 years and over that period paid them in todays terms $120,000.00. In all that period I was never a day late in my monthly rent. I would like their $180.00 security deposit back and either the personal possessions left in the room returned or payment for them. Following is a list of the items that I was unable to remove from the room. 100 Books ” ...Show more »

Claimant Seeks: $1955.89


*
PeopleClaim provides cost-efficient, self-directed online dispute resolution services for consumers, businesses and others. The information contained in any of the claims listed above or elsewhere on this site represents the opinion of the claiming party, and is not intended as a statement of actual fact or evidence of any wrongdoing. The responding party is invited to contest, comment, or otherwise respond to any statements made by the claiming party.

Respondents have the option to post publicly any rebuttal or clarification or to communicate privately with the claiming party any concerns, denials, or clarification regarding the matters addressed in this claim. Failure of a responding party to communicate any such concerns should not necessarily be viewed as admission or agreement to statements made by the claimant.