Resolve a dispute - It's FREE

Find complaint histories for businesses, professionals, and anyone else:

  • Help resolve a dispute:
  • Review the case
  • Propose your solution
  • Win the reward.

Claim type with most consumer complaints —
Equal employment rights violation:

“Daniel Hill vs. Hill / Park Management Corporation Dba Six Flags Discovery Kingdom Et Al. 202501-27935030”

  • Claim Status:
  • In Negotiation
  • Posted on: April 10,2026

Complaint Types: Damage to reputation, Discrimination, Equal employment rights violation, Harassment, Income loss, Personal injury, Rude or Unprofessional Behavior, Violation of privacy

Claimant says: "my complaint is i was sexually abused while working for this company. the managers involved are  1 -mrs summer 2- mrs cyanne 3 mr dunn they are really weird and kept leaving their underware in the dressing room justv before i went in to put on my uniform. i think they were trying to start some kind of sexual orgy thing or something like that. i was employed in the haunted house as an actor durning holloween.  ”

Claimant Seeks: $29.98

“J.H. vs. Michigan Republican Party”

  • Claim Status:
  • In Negotiation
  • Posted on: October 04,2020

Complaint Types: Bad business practices, Contract / Agreement dispute, Equal employment rights violation, Failure to disclose facts, Failure to honor promises, Harassment, Income loss, Personal injury, Policy, Rude Behavior, Rude or Unprofessional Behavior, Salary / Benefit issue, Unfulfilled promises, Violation of privacy

Claimant says: "Hi, I was wondering who I would contact to make a written complaint about a position I took as a field organizer for MRP. I was very excited to promote for Trump. The problem I had with them is, I was working 14 hour days 7 days a week. ( I???m not making this up, really I had no time to eat, drink or rest.) Clearly I did not have breaks. Although, I only received compensation for 40 hours a week. How they got me in the first place is because I was lied to. I only was there a short time, but while I was there, I was” ...Show more »

Claimant Seeks: $5720

“William Quinn vs. Embassy Suites by Hilton Syracuse Destiny”

  • Claim Status:
  • In Negotiation
  • Posted on: January 10,2020

Complaint Types: Damage to reputation, Discrimination, Dismissal, Equal employment rights violation, Harassment, Income loss, Other, Personal injury, Policy, Rude Behavior, Rude or Unprofessional Behavior, Salary / Benefit issue, Unfulfilled promises, Violation of privacy

Claimant says: "embassy suite destiny did not provide safe work place i was verbally and physically assaulted by same employee they failed to pay me 25 dollars an hour which they promised at interview they owe me ten thousand dollars”

Claimant Seeks: $1080014.99

“L.P. vs. 21C Museum Hotel And The Savoy At 21C-Kansas City”

  • Claim Status:
  • In Negotiation
  • Posted on: October 29,2018

Complaint Types: Dismissal, Equal employment rights violation

Claimant says: "I am a former employee, that was wrongfully terminated 10/13/18, due to retaliation, because of complaints filed and questions about health related issues and other matters,, and   I had a bad experience at the 2lC Museum Hotels-Kansas Ciry when they have a no-smoking policy with-in the facilities and the hotel guest rooms. In August 2018, a group of musicians, were allowed to smoke” ...Show more »

Claimant Seeks: $40014.99

“My Claim vs. Moritz Cadillac Bmw Known 1Auto Group”

  • Claim Status:
  • In Negotiation
  • Posted on: September 16,2017

Complaint Types: Commercial / Other dispute, Equal employment rights violation, Salary / Benefit issue

Claimant says: "iN April of 2007 a discrimination complaint was filed by Counselor M Roger Hubut.  The claim was setttled by Counselor Pat Mahera counsel for Moritz  Cadillac .  However, they sugessted by Mr Hurlbut that the amount of 3500.00 be held out by Moritz Cadillac for Taxes.  I have not received any record of taxes having filed by the dealership or notice of the money being returned.  When I filled my taxes I was told that the claim was not taxable.   The dealership is now call” ...Show more »

Claimant Seeks: $0

“Sapphire Resorts Group Llc Dispute”

  • Claim Status:
  • In Negotiation
  • Posted on: August 30,2017

Complaint Types: This feels like a scam to me., Bad business practices, Damage to reputation, Discrimination, Dismissal, Equal employment rights violation, Failure to disclose facts, Failure to honor promises, Harassment, I was harassed the morning of my dismissal by a male co- worker, when I complained to upper management I was dismissed with laughter.., Income loss, Rude Behavior, Rude or Unprofessional Behavior, Salary / Benefit issue

Claimant says: "According to Nevada state law an employee should be given there final paycheck or will be fined. I was let go by this company for refusing to work under a hostile environment and voicing my opinion for all the customer scams that's taking place on a daily basis.”

Claimant Seeks: $13250

“K.C. vs. Pizza Hut”

  • Claim Status:
  • In Negotiation
  • Posted on: September 08,2016

Complaint Types: Company policy violation, Discrimination, Equal employment rights violation, Policy

Claimant says: "I've worked for Pizza Hut on and off for about 10 years now and I've recently I've never had any problems always done what I was supposed to do. On this particular day our regional manager Ali decided to show up and make a remark about my khaki pants that I was wearing for work which had me a little confused because I had worn these same pants for about 6-7 months that I've had worked at the location. so after I had finished my shift I was fired for wearing the pants which once again I'm dumbfounded about so then I deci” ...Show more »

Claimant Seeks: $0

“E.K. vs. Cleveland Bricks Cleveland Ohio”

  • Claim Status:
  • In Negotiation
  • Posted on: August 30,2016

Complaint Types: Damage to reputation, Dismissal, Equal employment rights violation, Income loss, Rude Behavior, Rude or Unprofessional Behavior, Salary / Benefit issue, Unfulfilled promises, Violation of privacy

Claimant says: "I did work for Cleveland Bricks, 29 hours worth of work per a work order. I was never paid for these hours after working for them for 8 weeks and never having an issue. When inquiring as to where my payment was for the work I received an email stating that we do not employee drug addicts and thieves. They could not provide proof to these accusations and they had no problem paying for the other 7 weeks I worked for them. All I want is my 435.00 owed to me. Please pay me my money so we can both end this with out go” ...Show more »

Claimant Seeks: $435

“R.A. vs. Traditional Masonry Of Virginia, Inc. August 1 2016”

  • Claim Status:
  • In Negotiation
  • Posted on: August 14,2016

Complaint Types: Commercial / Other dispute, Damage to reputation, Equal employment rights violation, Income loss, Rude Behavior, Violation of privacy

Claimant says: "I have worked for this Company for 2 and a half years. I recently went on a paid vacation they approved and paid me for. I came back to work my next scheduled day and asked about my pay check that was owed to me on July 29th the physical pay period They they told me they only owed me 14hours and they might have my check on August 12th.I would like to no how they can legally with hold my earnings? Everyone else received there checks on July 29th. And they said it was completely legal do so. I have a family and bills lik” ...Show more »

Claimant Seeks: $315.99

“Richter Precision Dispute”

  • Claim Status:
  • In Negotiation
  • Posted on: August 07,2016

Complaint Types: Bad business practices, Discrimination, Equal employment rights violation, Income loss

Claimant says: "Was told I was too old to work. And terminated after 20 years of perfect employee service”

Claimant Seeks: $0

1 to 10 of 45 | Go To
  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
  6. »

*
PeopleClaim provides cost-efficient, self-directed online dispute resolution services for consumers, businesses and others. The information contained in any of the claims listed above or elsewhere on this site represents the opinion of the claiming party, and is not intended as a statement of actual fact or evidence of any wrongdoing. The responding party is invited to contest, comment, or otherwise respond to any statements made by the claiming party.

Respondents have the option to post publicly any rebuttal or clarification or to communicate privately with the claiming party any concerns, denials, or clarification regarding the matters addressed in this claim. Failure of a responding party to communicate any such concerns should not necessarily be viewed as admission or agreement to statements made by the claimant.