Resolve a dispute - It's FREE

Find complaint histories for businesses, professionals, and anyone else:

  • Help resolve a dispute:
  • Review the case
  • Propose your solution
  • Win the reward.

Showing 33 matches for Chevrolet:

“Raquel Gonzalez vs. Gm Bowling Green Assembly”

  • Claim Status:
  • In Negotiation
  • Posted on: April 07,2023

Complaint Types: I just feel ripped off., Problem with a product

Claimant says: "TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: I am writing to notify you of the problems I am experiencing with my (CHEVY CORVETTE 2022 2DR CPE STINGR 1G1YB2D49N5117200) and the request that you correct this problem within (30) days of your receipt of this letter. I purchased my vehicle from (BERT OGDEN 400 E EXPRESSWAY 83 MISSION TX. ??? (956) 704-9544)) I purchased my vehicle 03/05/2022 and I started to have trouble with it in October 1, 2022 6 month after I purchased my vehicle I went to a party which it was 3 miles away from my house” ...Show more »

Claimant Seeks: $14.99

“My Claim vs. Dublin Chevrolet GMC Buick, Dublin GA”

  • Claim Status:
  • In Negotiation
  • Posted on: August 05,2017

Complaint Types: I just feel ripped off., Bad business practices, Customer service runarounds, Problem with a service

Claimant says: "I contacted a dealership about a truck I sent emails to make them aware of excatly what I was willing to pay out the door tax tags and fees out the door. Tracy Mezo sent email stating that the sales manager had agreed upon a price of 5000.00 down and 32500.00 out the door I let them know I would be missing work and driving 3/1/2 hours 200 miles one way in which i did and upon arriving that Saturday I was greeted my Rex and Sandy they brought a deal to the table that was not even close to the deal I had made with Mr Sand” ...Show more »

Claimant Seeks: $33820

“S.L. vs. Mark Christopher Chevrolet”

  • Claim Status:
  • In Negotiation
  • Posted on: July 25,2017

Complaint Types: Commercial / Other dispute, Other

Claimant says: "My wife and I visited Mark Christopher Auto Center to get a lease price on a new Cadillac XT5. After test driving the car we sat down to make a deal. Your “salesman” took the keys to the van that I wanted to trade in. When he came back and presented us with an obviously inflated price for his car and a ridiculously low allowance for our trade in and would not negotiate further we asked for our keys and left. The next day we received a phone call from the sales manager stating he could make us a great deal a” ...Show more »

Claimant Seeks: $0

“Zackary Gill vs. Wright Chevrolet Buick Gmc”

  • Claim Status:
  • In Negotiation
  • Posted on: July 17,2017

Complaint Types: I just feel ripped off., Bad business practices, Overcharge or billing error, Problem with a product, Problem with a service

Claimant says: "I went to Wright Chevy Dealer, Located in Baden PA.  i told them i had a car i wanted to trade in and i still had payments on it, they said no problem they can get me in a brand new 2017 chevy cruze, couple days go by and i get a call saying i was approved come on down.   I get there and the salesman pointed and said thats your car (2008 hyundai elantra) i said thats not my car. he said thats all they can do. i said okay let me test drive it and ill see if i like it. The salesman said okay let me grab the keys” ...Show more »

Claimant Seeks: $34.97

“My Claim vs. Kent Ketterling, Maita Chevrolet 9650 Auto Center Drive Elk Grove 95757 (916) 423-2111”

  • Claim Status:
  • In Negotiation
  • Posted on: January 14,2017

Complaint Types: I just feel ripped off., Bad business practices, Customer service runarounds, Overcharge or billing error

Claimant says: "I would like to be compensated for the inconvenience of being without my truck for 6 days on a 3 1/2 hour labor job. I would like to be reimbursed $210.00 for total amount I paid for the diagnosis fluids and taxes. On 12/15/2016, I sent letter to Kent Ketterling General Manager along with a time line of daily telephone conversations between Service Manager Danny Guerro and myself. I have yet to hear from Mr. Ketterling. I have also left him voice mail messages on 12/28/2016 and 01/02/17. On December 12, 2016, before” ...Show more »

Claimant Seeks: $217.99

“S.W. vs. Chevrolet Authorized Dealer”

  • Claim Status:
  • In Negotiation
  • Posted on: October 01,2016

Complaint Types: Bad business practices, Problem with a product

Claimant says: "BAD TIRES COULD HAVE COST ME AND MY HUSBAND LIVES!!! I am writing because I wanted to express how disappointed I am with the service I received. When we brought I traverse from Maxiprice dealer in Loganville we told the dealer and the sales rep the car was alerting us the pressure is low and we had to keep putting air in the tires. they told us it was just the weather the heat and the alerts will stop. So two weeks from buying the car the pressure of the tires keep being low so we went to another dealer and they said yo” ...Show more »

Claimant Seeks: $1913.62

“K.H. vs. Newport Chevrolet Buick Gmc 320 John Stark Highway Newport Nh 03773”

  • Claim Status:
  • In Negotiation
  • Posted on: July 12,2016

Complaint Types: I just feel ripped off., Problem with a product

Claimant says: "Back two years ago i went up to the dealership to look at some used vehicles to replace my 98 they told me i could not afford most of there cars on the lot and suggested a 08 jeep liberty out back i looked at it and said it was alright so i signed papers traded in my 98 and gave them $2000 later that night i thought about it and decided it was not for me i went back the next day and told them i did not want the jeep it was not what i wanted they complained saying i signed papers and already got rid of the 98 i kept insi” ...Show more »

Claimant Seeks: $10.98

“Calvin H vs. Doug Henry Chevrolet Of 8567 Marlboro Road, Farmville, Nc 27828”

  • Claim Status:
  • In Negotiation
  • Posted on: May 15,2016

Complaint Types: I just feel ripped off., Bad business practices

Claimant says: "We are very unhappy because of a faulty vehicle we were sold by Doug Henry. A 2013 Hyundai, Accent, GLS. Vehicle ID number KMHCT4AE6DU369493, with 43,356 miles when purchased. Cash price of vehicle was $11, 629.00. We have questions about many of the hidden fees we were charged. Such as Electronic filing fee,$69.00, Admin Processing fee, $469.00, warranty contract fee $1,859.16, and charges paid to others on our behalf in the amount of $2,558.00. We were treated with disrespect and lied to after being promise that the p” ...Show more »

Claimant Seeks: $7.99

“M.M. vs. Scoville Meno Chevrolet Pontiac Gmc”

  • Claim Status:
  • In Negotiation
  • Posted on: April 28,2016

Complaint Types: Customer service runarounds, Problem with a service

Claimant says: "bought a car from them on 3/10/2016. when I went to pick up car it had a cracked bumper they gave me an IOU and I took car home they called to have me. bring car back for repairs on 3/10. it is now 4/18 and I do not have car back. they constantly tell me having trouble getting parts and the car is now someplace In Johnson city”

Claimant Seeks: $7.99

“Christina Hernandez vs. Premier Chevrolet Of Buena Park”

  • Claim Status:
  • In Negotiation
  • Posted on: April 25,2016

Complaint Types: Bad business practices

Claimant says: "I received a flyer in the mail - it was a cash game and per the instructions it showed I was a winner of $5,000 cash prize. I had to call to make an appointment to claim my prize - which I did on March 8, 2016 with the sales manager to collect my winnings. There was more than 25 people there doing the same thing and we were all upset to find out that we didn't win the $5,000 because our cards confirmation # had to match theirs, but it doesn't state that on the flyer or literature they sent for the game. There was a c” ...Show more »

Claimant Seeks: $5025.97

1 to 10 of 33 | Go To
  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. »

*
PeopleClaim provides cost-efficient, self-directed online dispute resolution services for consumers, businesses and others. The information contained in any of the claims listed above or elsewhere on this site represents the opinion of the claiming party, and is not intended as a statement of actual fact or evidence of any wrongdoing. The responding party is invited to contest, comment, or otherwise respond to any statements made by the claiming party.

Respondents have the option to post publicly any rebuttal or clarification or to communicate privately with the claiming party any concerns, denials, or clarification regarding the matters addressed in this claim. Failure of a responding party to communicate any such concerns should not necessarily be viewed as admission or agreement to statements made by the claimant.