Claimant says: "I ordered a razor 2025 and before I committed to the agreement I made sure he had the right phone ordered and he said yes. I got the phone and it was the I phone I specifically stated I hated. Then when I tried to get them to fix it they offered a refund only if I sent the phone back. I needed a phone not a refund and I couldn???t wait when I called them I even told them how important it was that I had a phone just trade the phone out and send me the right phone and they refused to do anything until I sent the phone bac” ...Show more »

Claimant says: "I ordered a razor 2025 and before I committed to the agreement I made sure he had the right phone ordered and he said yes. I got the phone and it was the I phone I specifically stated I hated. Then when I tried to get them to fix it they offered a refund only if I sent the phone back. I needed a phone not a refund and I couldn???t wait when I called them I even told them how important it was that I had a phone just trade the phone out and send me the right phone and they refused to do anything until I sent the phone back so I activated the phone hoping that I could fix it later they refuse to send me the right phone and now they???ve got me trapped paying for a phone that I do not want first of all they should make up for the mistake. They made in someway shape or form besides giving me the right phone then they should give me the right phone.*” ...Show less »

Claimant says: "I took my 2011 Mercedes Benz Sprinter to Private Stock on consignment. The owner contacted me on 4/22/25 to inform me my vehicle had been vandalized. He said the catalytic converter had been stolen. This was not true. After having it towed to Floyd's Truck Center for diagnosis, it was determined the damage included removal of the wiring harness &missing exhaust components. Repairing would cost over $12,000. Robert Buxton (owner) said he didn't feel he should be responsible for All of the damage. I asked him for his in” ...Show more »

Claimant says: "I took my 2011 Mercedes Benz Sprinter to Private Stock on consignment. The owner contacted me on 4/22/25 to inform me my vehicle had been vandalized. He said the catalytic converter had been stolen. This was not true. After having it towed to Floyd's Truck Center for diagnosis, it was determined the damage included removal of the wiring harness &missing exhaust components. Repairing would cost over $12,000. Robert Buxton (owner) said he didn't feel he should be responsible for All of the damage. I asked him for his insurance Company name & he refused to give it to me. I contacted my insurance & got a letter of denial with a case # to submit to his insurance company. This was left in his care & he was negligent & failed to secure it. I believe, by law, car dealers are REQUIRED to carry (at the least) 'Garage' Insurance. Private Stock advertises their lot is covered by 24/7 camera surveillance. I discovered the cameras had not been working for years. The parking lot was NOT well lit as advertised. They never filed a police report, so I did so with Pennington Co. Sheriff's Office. My Mercedes has been parked at Floyd's for months. I contacted Robert Buxton again August 24 in an effort to resolve this. He let me know he wasn't going to pay anything. I asked for his insurance information again & he hung up on me. Since this incident, Private Stock has lit the parking lot & installed cameras. At the time, I consigned my vehicle neither of these (advertised) were done. I believe he is responsible for ALL damage done to my vehicle under his care. I would greatly appreciate any to avoid taking this to court.*” ...Show less »

Claimant says: "1. BACKGROUND AND AGREEMENT The parties initially connected through Fiverr.com. The plaintiff explicitly requested that all services be conducted through the Fiverr platform to ensure protection. However, the defendant insisted on moving the transaction off-platform, stating that she preferred not to use Fiverr for the project. The plaintiff, although hesitant, proceeded in good faith.  It was agreed that the defendant would provide targeted outreach to secure wholesale orders from fashion retailers. The plaintiff ” ...Show more »

Claimant says: "1. BACKGROUND AND AGREEMENT The parties initially connected through Fiverr.com. The plaintiff explicitly requested that all services be conducted through the Fiverr platform to ensure protection. However, the defendant insisted on moving the transaction off-platform, stating that she preferred not to use Fiverr for the project. The plaintiff, although hesitant, proceeded in good faith.  It was agreed that the defendant would provide targeted outreach to secure wholesale orders from fashion retailers. The plaintiff emphasized the urgency and time-sensitive nature of the task, stating that the outreach had to be completed within 2–3 weeks due to the brand's production schedule. The defendant confirmed she had experience in luxury womenswear sales and agreed to the scope and timeline. 2. PAYMENT AND SERVICES PROMISED On June 12, 2025, Roch Perel Ltd made an initial payment of $540 USD via Wise bank transfer from its business account to the defendant. This payment was for the agreed wholesale outreach campaign. Shortly after, the defendant stated that she could not begin outreach unless she also managed the plaintiff's social media channels, which was never part of the original agreement. Under pressure to meet the tight deadline, the plaintiff accommodated the demand and arranged for all necessary content to be prepared by a graphic designer. A second payment of $120 USD was sent on July 1, 2025 via Wise, covering three platforms (Instagram, Facebook, and TikTok). 3. FAILURE TO PERFORM Despite receiving full payment totaling $660 USD, the defendant failed to perform the agreed services: • No outreach was conducted to any retailers. • No wholesale leads or contacts were secured. • No social media posts were properly made, even though the plaintiff provided full content, captions, and a clear plan. The only deliverable was a generic content calendar clearly generated by ChatGPT, including language and formatting consistent with automated AI tools (e.g., Would you like a downloadable PDF or Google Sheet version of this calendar?). This was not original work and held no value for the business. The defendant's communication was also highly unprofessional, often vague, delayed, and non committal. She demonstrated a lack of basic industry knowledge, such as recommending that wholesale prices be published publicly on social media — a fundamental breach of standard retail practice. 4. ATTEMPTS TO RESOLVE AND REFUND DEMAND The plaintiff made multiple written requests for a refund. The defendant acknowledged the service was not delivered and made verbal and written promises to issue a refund, but never followed through. A final formal demand letter was sent on August 1, 2025, giving her two business days to respond. She ignored the deadline. The plaintiff has acted in good faith throughout the process and has provided full documentation of communication, payments, and service expectations. The defendant's actions amount to a clear breach of contract, unjust enrichment, and failure to deliver services paid for in full.*” ...Show less »

Claimant says: "I've bought one propety to BRRRR with them in March/April 2024 with an ARV of $110,000 based on their drive by appraisals and when it was complete it came in at $77,000 which put me in the hole from the $84,000 I purhcased the property for plus the rehab   A second property was bought for $97,500 with an ARV of $128,000 also based on their driveby appraisals that was a 3 bedro0m 1 bathroom initially, but after the rehab was finished the appraisal came in at $84,000 and only a 2 bedroom 1 bathroom with a bonus room,” ...Show more »

Claimant says: "I've bought one propety to BRRRR with them in March/April 2024 with an ARV of $110,000 based on their drive by appraisals and when it was complete it came in at $77,000 which put me in the hole from the $84,000 I purhcased the property for plus the rehab   A second property was bought for $97,500 with an ARV of $128,000 also based on their driveby appraisals that was a 3 bedro0m 1 bathroom initially, but after the rehab was finished the appraisal came in at $84,000 and only a 2 bedroom 1 bathroom with a bonus room, so I was sold a product that wasn't what I initially agreed to buy and both properties didn't come close to what was expected based on the inital after rehab value.    I've also not has very much if any communication to try to resolve or figure what needs to happen and there wasn't much communication or discussion along the entire rehab process to assure things were getting done on time (90 days was promised) and I'm now 10 months since buying the home with no real confirmation things are complete or if there is a tenant that is moving in and whether they are willing to work with me to buyback the properties since they are not what was sold or billed to be once completed.  I've tried working with Jason Hartmann and his contacts which is how I was referred to this company and have exhausted every avenue to get communication via text, whatsapp, calling, email and even trying to setup or schedule a group call to get things figured out to no avail   *” ...Show less »

Claimant says: "A handicap scooter was stolen from the porch of the condo that we were vacationing at. I have contacted the owner, the community association, and the booking agent and no one will help. I requested insurance and lawyer info for the homeowner and  Champions Gate, and cannot get it from them. ”