Resolve a dispute - It's FREE

Find complaint histories for businesses, professionals, and anyone else:

  • Help resolve a dispute:
  • Review the case
  • Propose your solution
  • Win the reward.

Claim type with most consumer complaints —
illegal business practice:

“Verizon Business-Dispute-#6832929”

  • Claim Status:
  • In Negotiation
  • Posted on: April 17,2012

Complaint Types: Bad business practices, Contract / Agreement / Promise dispute, Customer service runarounds, Illegal business practice, Overcharge or billing error

Claimant says: "My business - Langston Racing in Lake Elsinore, California closed. I closed my business account with them and had to pay a penalty for early termination - which I did. The disconecton was done on August 25th 2010 with Robert (a verizon employee) and the reference was 00119353. I paid the penalty in three installments of $638.31 on October, November and December of 2010. I now work for West Coast Yamaha Inc - I am a sharholder here - and they have lodged a lien against this company for $3000.00. I have tried to resolve i” ...Show more »

Claimant Seeks: $22.9

Help resolve this case
Resolution Reward: 1000 points

“BMW Lease End Statement”

  • Claim Status:
  • In Negotiation
  • Posted on: September 17,2010

Complaint Types: Billing / Fees, illegal business practice, Questionable Business Practices

Claimant says: "We had a lease from april14,2007 to april14,2010,paid all our payments 36months.Schomp bought are lease and car on March28,2010,this was done without our consent.We found out from another dealer that we had a car we did not own or lease.We called the dealer but no responce.I found this out on april 1.We live 4hours from the dealer,I returned the car to the dealer on the april 11th 3days before my lease was up,so I thought.The finance company called.they wanted to know if the car was at schomp.I asked for a end of term c” ...Show more »

Claimant Seeks: $0

Help resolve this case
Resolution Reward: 1000 points


*
PeopleClaim provides cost-efficient, self-directed online dispute resolution services for consumers, businesses and others. The information contained in any of the claims listed above or elsewhere on this site represents the opinion of the claiming party, and is not intended as a statement of actual fact or evidence of any wrongdoing. The responding party is invited to contest, comment, or otherwise respond to any statements made by the claiming party.

Respondents have the option to post publicly any rebuttal or clarification or to communicate privately with the claiming party any concerns, denials, or clarification regarding the matters addressed in this claim. Failure of a responding party to communicate any such concerns should not necessarily be viewed as admission or agreement to statements made by the claimant.