Resolve a dispute - It's FREE

Find complaint histories for businesses, professionals, and anyone else:

  • Help resolve a dispute:
  • Review the case
  • Propose your solution
  • Win the reward.

Showing 5 matches for Roto Rooter:

“Dissapointed vs. Roto-Rooter Group, Inc (Headquarters)”

  • Claim Status:
  • In Negotiation
  • Posted on: July 05,2016

Complaint Types: Bad business practices, Commercial / Other dispute

Claimant says: "Rotor Rooter sent a follow-up survey regarding a recent visit to my home on Tuesday June 21st, the following are my comments: I can't believe it cost me $455.00 for a 20 minute visit. I spoke to the manager Debbie who confirmed that they quoted us this price up front and we agreed to the work. The missing piece is when you hear that price you believe this must be a BIG problem and will take the repair person considerable time to fix. You do not expect the repair person to be done in 20 minutes. Why doesn't Roto-Rooter” ...Show more »

Claimant Seeks: $7.99

“Roto-Rooter Dispute”

  • Claim Status:
  • In Negotiation
  • Posted on: July 23,2015

Complaint Types: I just feel ripped off., Bad business practices

Claimant says: "I was way over charged for a job the took under two hours. (a repaired sewer pipe). They would only promise to do the job if I gave $3,400 the day they observed the problem, and another $3,400 on the next day when completed. The engineer came into my home, easily detecting my age, being retired, and also being a helpless woman. I resented the fact that I was a victim.”

Claimant Seeks: $0

“Roto Rooter Dispute”

  • Claim Status:
  • In Negotiation
  • Posted on: June 17,2014

Complaint Types: I just feel ripped off., Bad business practices, Customer service runarounds, Overcharge or billing error, Problem with a product

Claimant says: "i called rotor rooter to repair a leaking pipe to the water heater on a home where my grandkids were residing. the plumber repaired the pipe with pvc, turned the water on and had to repair another pipe again with pvc leaving and not joining the pipes to the other pipes leaving no water for upstairs. i finally got a plumber out there. he stated to my granddaughter that it was against codes to connect pvc to galvanized which was the basic installation. he also stated te galvanized was partially stopped up. this went” ...Show more »

Claimant Seeks: $10.98

“roto rooter-Dispute-#1875268”

  • Claim Status:
  • In Negotiation
  • Posted on: May 15,2012

Complaint Types: Bad business practices

Claimant says: "On 3/29/2012, Roto Rooter responded to a call that I was having backup - water was coming in the house. They rotted and found there was a section of the sewer pipe under the front lawn which had collapsed. Thus, the water couldn't get to the main sewer line. The plumber, Greg Austin, told me that they would have to dig up the front lawn to replace the pipe, and they would do that the next day. The cost would be $3,262 on the 29th and $3,262 on the 30th. The total dig time was 5 hours. Due to the severity of the ba” ...Show more »

Claimant Seeks: $4025.89

“Roto Rooter-Dispute-#9688039”

  • Claim Status:
  • In Negotiation
  • Posted on: March 20,2011

Complaint Types: Bad business practices, Contract / Agreement / Promise dispute, I just feel ripped off., Overcharge or billing error, Problem with a service, Product Defect

Claimant says: "Spetic Specialist, Brian Ahearn, is willing to write a letter to backup my claim. I will provide his contact information as requested.”

Claimant Seeks: $8600


*
PeopleClaim provides cost-efficient, self-directed online dispute resolution services for consumers, businesses and others. The information contained in any of the claims listed above or elsewhere on this site represents the opinion of the claiming party, and is not intended as a statement of actual fact or evidence of any wrongdoing. The responding party is invited to contest, comment, or otherwise respond to any statements made by the claiming party.

Respondents have the option to post publicly any rebuttal or clarification or to communicate privately with the claiming party any concerns, denials, or clarification regarding the matters addressed in this claim. Failure of a responding party to communicate any such concerns should not necessarily be viewed as admission or agreement to statements made by the claimant.