Resolve a dispute - It's FREE

Find complaint histories for businesses, professionals, and anyone else:

  • Help resolve a dispute:
  • Review the case
  • Propose your solution
  • Win the reward.

Showing 4 matches for Northern Leasing Systems, Inc.:

“Joseph Sahagun vs. Lease Finance Group”

  • Claim Status:
  • In Negotiation
  • Posted on: April 24,2016

Complaint Types: Bad business practices

Claimant says: "they say I owe monies for a merchant card machine that i returned to them and have proof . they say they never got it and continue to charge me for services never received, they said I signed a contract I then told them to show me proof , they sent me copies of a contract with my name and my FORGED signature, I told them , they took me to small claims and are trying to sue me for 3500.00 ,,how they are able to do this is beyond belief maybe the courts there on crooked as well, after much investigation and hiring ” ...Show more »

Claimant Seeks: $4825.97

“My Claim vs. Lease Finance Group Dispute”

  • Claim Status:
  • In Negotiation
  • Posted on: October 31,2014

Complaint Types: I just feel ripped off., Bad business practices, Contract / Agreement dispute, Failure to disclose facts, Poor Value for Money

Claimant says: "In March of 2013 a Maurice Sayles came into my business and wanted me to change credit card processors. He took a look at several months of statements and said he could save me around $150.00 monthly. I told him I was interested in the service but under no circumstances did I want to lease any equipment as I owned my own. He told me that his company gives you the updated equipment that is PCI compliant. He also pointed out on the paperwork before I signed it that the equipment lease amount was 0. One month later I fin” ...Show more »

Claimant Seeks: $25.97

“Lease Finance Group Dispute #2918631”

  • Claim Status:
  • In Negotiation
  • Posted on: October 12,2013

Complaint Types: I just feel ripped off., Bad business practices, Contract / Agreement / Promise dispute, Problem with a service

Claimant says: "Lease Finance Group continues to report negatively on my credit report despite the fact that the account is too old to be reporting. The last payment or date of activity was in mid 2006, which according to FCRA & California Statute of limitations on negative reporting it should have been off my credit report this June of 2013. Lease Finance states that my last date of payment was June 2007, this is not correct information, since I did no longer had use of their equipment after June of 2006, when I had to close down due ” ...Show more »

Claimant Seeks: $32.96

“Northern Leasing Systems, Inc.-Dispute-#1062024”

  • Claim Status:
  • In Negotiation
  • Posted on: May 08,2012

Complaint Types: I just feel ripped off., Bad business practices, Contract / Agreement / Promise dispute, Customer service runarounds, Overcharge or billing error

Claimant says: "On 10/10/08 I signed a merchant contract for credit card processing (my business is a Fantastic Sams Hair Salon located in Port Charlotte, FL) with BankCardDepot, 612 Wheelers Farms Rd. Milford, CT 06461 #203-882-8597. The account rep., Sr. Advisor, Michael Filzinger (#239-896-0257) had me sign an equipment lease contract for the use of a Hypercom T7P stand alone credit card machine, with LSI(Lease Source, Inc. 515 Broad Hollow Rd. Melville, NY 11747. On 10/21/08 Mr. Filzenger brought the cc machine into the salon to s” ...Show more »

Claimant Seeks: $2507.95


*
PeopleClaim provides cost-efficient, self-directed online dispute resolution services for consumers, businesses and others. The information contained in any of the claims listed above or elsewhere on this site represents the opinion of the claiming party, and is not intended as a statement of actual fact or evidence of any wrongdoing. The responding party is invited to contest, comment, or otherwise respond to any statements made by the claiming party.

Respondents have the option to post publicly any rebuttal or clarification or to communicate privately with the claiming party any concerns, denials, or clarification regarding the matters addressed in this claim. Failure of a responding party to communicate any such concerns should not necessarily be viewed as admission or agreement to statements made by the claimant.