Resolve a dispute - It's FREE

Find complaint histories for businesses, professionals, and anyone else:

  • Help resolve a dispute:
  • Review the case
  • Propose your solution
  • Win the reward.

Showing 5 matches for MagicJack:

“Mary Brown vs. Magic Jack”

  • Claim Status:
  • In Negotiation
  • Posted on: September 08,2016

Complaint Types: I just feel ripped off., Customer service runarounds, Other, Overcharge or billing error, Problem with a product, Problem with a service

Claimant says: "I found out I had no 911 on phone. My friend died as I was trying to find another phone. I have the 198.30 for 8 years. Now I want to get away from you. Oh I can't do that because I have no plan with magic jack for 911. I have prove of the 8 year plan. I just want to get a way from you. I had to reactivated and had to pay another $37.50 before you would help me. My LAWYER is on the way to speak you. You know I can't believe I had to this. Leave me alone and give my money. Just think BBB is helping too. You can call me,” ...Show more »

Claimant Seeks: $4507.99

“G.W. <b>vs.</b> Magicjack.Com”

  • Claim Status:
  • In Negotiation
  • Posted on: March 08,2016

Complaint Types: I just feel ripped off., Bad business practices, Overcharge or billing error

Claimant says: "I briefly used Magicjack for my home phone service. It was very substandard in that it didn't provide the basic features for my home phone service that I'd previously had. The Caller ID feature for incoming calls with Magicjack doesn't display the callers name--just numbers. They do not make that clear in any of their advertising. The Call Waiting feature doesn't display anything--no name or number just a sound that indicates another call is waiting. In addition to that, it could take up to 32 seconds for an outbound ” ...Show more »

Claimant Seeks: $43.12

“MAGIC JACK-Dispute-#2467990”

  • Claim Status:
  • In Negotiation
  • Posted on: December 22,2011

Complaint Types: Bad business practices, Problem with a service

Claimant says: "my computer crashed and i had to buy a new one, my magic jack won't work at all on the new computer, i have tried for over a week to contact magic jack by phone and online. all the phones numbers for them are a constant busy and you cant even get to the online sites, they just sent me an email offering the new magic jack for 34.95 thru a link only again you cant get to the link. i am very frustrated . the magic jack is my only phone. what else can i do.my cell is for emergency only and costs .25 per minute to use.”

Claimant Seeks: $0

“Magic Jack-Dispute-#1454058”

  • Claim Status:
  • In Negotiation
  • Posted on: December 12,2011

Complaint Types: Bad business practices

Claimant says: "i own a barber shop in palm springs california. I recieved a phone call from magic jack and they offered me great prices on some items and they asked me if I wanted to place an order and I accepted and the total amount of my order was $424.00, about 2 days later i recieved a box which was suppose to be my order and it was totally something different nothing to do with what I had ordered. they called me the same day to tell me they had mixed up some orders and what i had recieved wasn't for me and that in 3 days i would ” ...Show more »

Claimant Seeks: $424

“Defective MagicJack device.”

  • Claim Status:
  • In Negotiation
  • Posted on: December 24,2010

Complaint Types: Bad business practices, Contract / Agreement / Promise dispute, Product Defect

Claimant says: "Work orders on the MagicJack. 1. LTK43605716308X - Abram 2. LTK43605777173X - Jan 3. LTK43605834247X - Lalie 4. LTK43605840062X - Prince 5. LTK43605860125X (On this repair ticket I caught Bradley looking at my Quicken - financial software. I stop him and ask him what he was doing. He quickly gave me to another technician). You got to watch everybody. 6. LTK43605921294X - Yvonne and Ruben”

Claimant Seeks: $4


*
PeopleClaim provides cost-efficient, self-directed online dispute resolution services for consumers, businesses and others. The information contained in any of the claims listed above or elsewhere on this site represents the opinion of the claiming party, and is not intended as a statement of actual fact or evidence of any wrongdoing. The responding party is invited to contest, comment, or otherwise respond to any statements made by the claiming party.

Respondents have the option to post publicly any rebuttal or clarification or to communicate privately with the claiming party any concerns, denials, or clarification regarding the matters addressed in this claim. Failure of a responding party to communicate any such concerns should not necessarily be viewed as admission or agreement to statements made by the claimant.