Resolve a dispute - It's FREE

Find complaint histories for businesses, professionals, and anyone else:

  • Help resolve a dispute:
  • Review the case
  • Propose your solution
  • Win the reward.

Showing 2 matches for Cool Aid:

“Cool-Aid-Dispute-#1694750”

  • Claim Status:
  • In Negotiation
  • Posted on: October 04,2012

Complaint Types: I just feel ripped off., Bad business practices

Claimant says: "My airconditioner started leaking water from the bottom of the unit. The man from Cool-Aid came and told me that this unit was shot and, if we fixed it, very soon the same thing would happen again. They changed the entire unit. He said the return duct will have to be changed too it will not pass inspection and the entire money I spent would be wasted. Bottom line cost it $7,300. Later we found out that the best brand unit should have cost no more than $5,500. When the inspector came he said the duct would have been” ...Show more »

Claimant Seeks: $1822.9

“Cool-Aid-Dispute-#6507058”

  • Claim Status:
  • In Negotiation
  • Posted on: December 31,2011

Complaint Types: I just feel ripped off., Bad business practices, Contract / Agreement / Promise dispute, Customer service runarounds, Overcharge or billing error, Problem with a service

Claimant says: "Company: Cool-Aid, Inverness, FL State Lic# CAC1816026 I was contacted by this cpmpany during the second week of May 2011 and informed that they had taken over service from a company I had a contract with and that I was due a free service call. May 24, 2011, a company tecnician (Ronnie Pagano) arrived at our residence and upon inspection of our two year old unit informed me that we needed a new capacitor at the cost of $310.00. When I balked because our unit from SEARS was very new he informed me that they always put ” ...Show more »

Claimant Seeks: $374


*
PeopleClaim provides cost-efficient, self-directed online dispute resolution services for consumers, businesses and others. The information contained in any of the claims listed above or elsewhere on this site represents the opinion of the claiming party, and is not intended as a statement of actual fact or evidence of any wrongdoing. The responding party is invited to contest, comment, or otherwise respond to any statements made by the claiming party.

Respondents have the option to post publicly any rebuttal or clarification or to communicate privately with the claiming party any concerns, denials, or clarification regarding the matters addressed in this claim. Failure of a responding party to communicate any such concerns should not necessarily be viewed as admission or agreement to statements made by the claimant.