Resolve a dispute - It's FREE

Find complaint histories for businesses, professionals, and anyone else:

  • Help resolve a dispute:
  • Review the case
  • Propose your solution
  • Win the reward.

Showing 17 matches for Cadillac:

“B.C. vs. Cadillac (Headquarters)”

  • Claim Status:
  • In Negotiation
  • Posted on: March 13,2020

Complaint Types: Commercial / Other dispute, Having to pay to replace defective parts from factory

Claimant says: "You issue a customer service satisfaction letter for the 2010 SRX which I own but will only cover 1/2 of the costs for faulty or defective parts that caused moisture to build up inside the headlamp assembly rendering the headlight to partially perform or not perform at all! And you DON???T consider this a SAFETY ISSUE?!!!”

Claimant Seeks: $1670

“My Claim vs. Moritz Cadillac Bmw Known 1Auto Group”

  • Claim Status:
  • In Negotiation
  • Posted on: September 16,2017

Complaint Types: Commercial / Other dispute, Equal employment rights violation, Salary / Benefit issue

Claimant says: "iN April of 2007 a discrimination complaint was filed by Counselor M Roger Hubut.  The claim was setttled by Counselor Pat Mahera counsel for Moritz  Cadillac .  However, they sugessted by Mr Hurlbut that the amount of 3500.00 be held out by Moritz Cadillac for Taxes.  I have not received any record of taxes having filed by the dealership or notice of the money being returned.  When I filled my taxes I was told that the claim was not taxable.   The dealership is now call” ...Show more »

Claimant Seeks: $0

“R.C. vs. Riley Toyota Scion Cadillac”

  • Claim Status:
  • In Negotiation
  • Posted on: July 09,2017

Complaint Types: I just feel ripped off., Bad business practices, Customer service runarounds, Problem with a product, Problem with a service

Claimant says: "Purchased a brand new Toyota Highlander from Riley Chevrolet (0 miles).  I drove it two days and the transmission had to be replaced on the vehicle.  I argued the lemon law with no results.  I requested my other vehicle back with no results.  Riley said after the initial trade I no longer had any rights.  After several days of arguing that I would not accept the vehicle I was told they would get another new vehicle with an even trade if I would pay another administrative fee.  I accepted th” ...Show more »

Claimant Seeks: $19.98

“R.W. vs. Cadillac”

  • Claim Status:
  • In Negotiation
  • Posted on: October 18,2016

Complaint Types: I just feel ripped off., Bad business practices, Customer service runarounds, Problem with a product, Problem with a service

Claimant says: "This is a formal complaint about your service, I own a 2014 Cadillac and the CUE Infotainment system doesn't work. I called the Cue service center and took the car to my local dealer, Their response is that the touch glass needs to be replaced with a refurbished glass. They said that the part is on national back order which means I could wait for months or years before they get a part to refurbish and I can continue to enjoy my vehicle. Cadillac service as always been top notch, and this is not the kind of service I h” ...Show more »

Claimant Seeks: $7.99

“B.H. vs. Moore Cadillac”

  • Claim Status:
  • In Negotiation
  • Posted on: June 16,2016

Complaint Types: I just feel ripped off., Overcharge or billing error

Claimant says: "A few days ago my ABS TRAK light came on on my dash and I made an appointment for my 2009 Cadillace CTS at Moore Cadillac in Dulles, VA. My Service Advisor was Melissa Robinson. I arrived Thursday morning, May 26th to have the problem diagnosed and resolved. The car was driving fine when I took it in to Moore Cadillac Service Dept. About an hour and a half later, Ms. Robinson came out to tell me what was going on with my car and the repair costs. In repairing my right hub assembly sensor ring and stabilitrak, the re” ...Show more »

Claimant Seeks: $1000

“K.D. vs. Central Houston Cadillac”

  • Claim Status:
  • In Negotiation
  • Posted on: May 20,2016

Complaint Types: Problem with a product

Claimant says: "We purchased a 2008 Lincoln Navigator from this dealership in approximately February of 2016. My wife & I were assured that the vehicle was in great condition and did not have any mechanical issues; including major accidents, water damage, or anything that would impact the dependabiliity of the vehicle regarding it being a reliable method of transportation for my family. Prior to us purchasing the vehicle all of the suggested tests & carfax information was ran on the vehicle and the Cadillac dealership & their mechani” ...Show more »

Claimant Seeks: $7.99

“Vincent C vs. Rohrich Cadillace”

  • Claim Status:
  • In Negotiation
  • Posted on: May 12,2016

Complaint Types: Bad business practices

Claimant says: "I bought a vehicle from Rohrich Cadillac. A 2014 Cadillac. certified preowned as new. I purchased the vehicle. the first time I took the car back the windshield was damaged. the second time it was a damaged wheel. Third time a damaged steering wheel. numerous recalls on safety equipment, such as seat belts. Cadillac states that certified new is better than a new care warranty. I bought the warranty I took car in for service the car was returned to me damaged. The hood was not chipped when I sent the car in for service, ” ...Show more »

Claimant Seeks: $0

“James Irick vs. Rusty Wallace Of Morristown Tenn”

  • Claim Status:
  • In Negotiation
  • Posted on: April 26,2016

Complaint Types: I just feel ripped off., This feels like a scam to me., Bad business practices, Customer service runarounds, Failure to disclose facts, Failure to honor promises, Problem with a product, Problem with a service

Claimant says: "I bought a car March 12 2016, I owe 50,000 on this car, and it had 3500 miles on it so it still has full warranty. Well, on Friday March 18 2016 they called from dealship and told us we needed to bring the car in because there was a recall on one of the parts and they were going to replace it. Well I told her I would bring the car in on Monday March 21 2016. Well, I didn't get to take it in because Sunday March 20 2016 the car broke down( it wouldn't start). I called Monday and told them I wouldn't be there because the” ...Show more »

Claimant Seeks: $0

“Alexander Cadillic, GMC & Buick Dispute”

  • Claim Status:
  • In Negotiation
  • Posted on: August 22,2014

Complaint Types: I just feel ripped off., Bad business practices, Contract / Agreement dispute, Customer service runarounds, Failure to disclose facts, Overcharge or billing error, Problem with a service

Claimant says: "In May, my family and I were visiting with our daughter. We had driven out from Alabama. I have a 2004 Cadillac Deville. The car was missing, as though it had a miss fire, this was at a moderate speed. Get it up to about 70 it would smooth out. Also the service engine light was on constantly. On or about May 15 I took it into Alexander Cadillac there in Ventura, Ca. They told me that they would put it on their engine analyiser and let me know exactly what the problem was. They did that, but didn't let me know what t” ...Show more »

Claimant Seeks: $3695.97

“My Claim vs. Covert Cadillac Dispute”

  • Claim Status:
  • In Negotiation
  • Posted on: June 03,2014

Complaint Types: Bad business practices, Problem with a service

Claimant says: "On 04/11/0214 i took my Saturn Ion 2 to Covert Cadillac in response to a recall. Five weeks and five days later i recieved a call that my car was ready, I was also told that i had a broken motor mount witch they said that they did not do. Just before i took my car to Covert I had it serviced and had new brakes installed, they saw no sign of this damage to the car. I just took it in for them to inspect and they found a broken rear transmission mount and a broken left engine mount that was not in that condition and that” ...Show more »

Claimant Seeks: $954.5

1 to 10 of 17 | Go To
  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. »

*
PeopleClaim provides cost-efficient, self-directed online dispute resolution services for consumers, businesses and others. The information contained in any of the claims listed above or elsewhere on this site represents the opinion of the claiming party, and is not intended as a statement of actual fact or evidence of any wrongdoing. The responding party is invited to contest, comment, or otherwise respond to any statements made by the claiming party.

Respondents have the option to post publicly any rebuttal or clarification or to communicate privately with the claiming party any concerns, denials, or clarification regarding the matters addressed in this claim. Failure of a responding party to communicate any such concerns should not necessarily be viewed as admission or agreement to statements made by the claimant.