Resolve a dispute - It's FREE

Find complaint histories for businesses, professionals, and anyone else:

  • Help resolve a dispute:
  • Review the case
  • Propose your solution
  • Win the reward.

Claim type with most consumer complaints —
REFUND:

“Marie St Fleur-Dispute-#5238084”

  • Claim Status:
  • In Negotiation
  • Posted on: January 01,2012

Complaint Types: I just feel ripped off., Bad business practices, Contract / Agreement / Promise dispute, Customer service runarounds, Refund

Claimant says: "I won a bid on bid4assets.com where she posted the timeshare on July 17,2011. By October I received a note from the timeshare management informing me that Ms StFluer had not paid her maintenance fees, taxes or filed a proper transfer of deed and they could not proceed with transfer until those items were taken care of. At this point, I also lost my usage week for 2011 of which I paid for . I am requesting a full refund of the $1744 I paid for the winning bid, the value of the week usage and postage.”

Claimant Seeks: $2600

Help resolve this case
Resolution Reward: 1000 points

“Refund from Predators”

  • Claim Status:
  • In Negotiation
  • Posted on: June 22,2011

Complaint Types: Contract / Agreement / Promise dispute, refund

Claimant says: "Where is the BBB,FTC and other government watchdogs with a real bite to do something?This company is preying on the public sorrows.”

Claimant Seeks: $1000

Help resolve this case
Resolution Reward: 1000 points

“RipOff”

  • Claim Status:
  • In Negotiation
  • Posted on: December 26,2010

Complaint Types: Bad business practices, Poor value, Refund

Claimant says: "#1.I have a copy of the money order receipt. #2.I have a U.S. Postal service Delivery confirmation Receipt.”

Claimant Seeks: $180

Help resolve this case
Resolution Reward: 1000 points


*
PeopleClaim provides cost-efficient, self-directed online dispute resolution services for consumers, businesses and others. The information contained in any of the claims listed above or elsewhere on this site represents the opinion of the claiming party, and is not intended as a statement of actual fact or evidence of any wrongdoing. The responding party is invited to contest, comment, or otherwise respond to any statements made by the claiming party.

Respondents have the option to post publicly any rebuttal or clarification or to communicate privately with the claiming party any concerns, denials, or clarification regarding the matters addressed in this claim. Failure of a responding party to communicate any such concerns should not necessarily be viewed as admission or agreement to statements made by the claimant.