Resolve a dispute - It's FREE

Find complaint histories for businesses, professionals, and anyone else:

  • Help resolve a dispute:
  • Review the case
  • Propose your solution
  • Win the reward.

Claim type with most consumer complaints —
Questionable business practices:

“west chester kia 326 westtown road west chester pa.19382-Dispute-#3986834”

  • Claim Status:
  • In Negotiation
  • Posted on: December 09,2010

Complaint Types: Contract / Agreement, Questionable Business Practices

Claimant says: "on august 28 2010 I had taken my kia sorrento in for service at west chester kia to have my oil changed which is covered under my service plan, when I checked the car in I was asked if I whould like to have my cars 15,000 mile service done only to find out it was not covered under my service and it would cost an addional $198.00 for this service which consist of an oil change air filter and tire rotation which should be covered under my service agreement. told them no and wanted to cancel my service agreement and they t” ...Show more »

Claimant Seeks: $0

Help resolve this case
Resolution Reward: 1000 points

“Omelge.com is porn site for kids”

  • Claim Status:
  • In Negotiation
  • Posted on: December 04,2010

Complaint Types: Marketing / Promotion, Questionable Business Practices

Claimant says: "Porn site online that shows people masturbating in real time. Any child can get to it, doesn't matter age. The perverts see and hear them as they jack off. They do nothing to prevent this from happening and there is no contact info given. The web gone wild and preying on our children. It is a porn site that is getting revenue probably because of the traffic of minors. Check it out yourself.”

Claimant Seeks: $500000

Help resolve this case
Resolution Reward: 1000 points

“comed electric company-Dispute-#9430580”

  • Claim Status:
  • In Negotiation
  • Posted on: December 02,2010

Complaint Types: Policy, Questionable Business Practices, Service Problem

Claimant says: "comed disconnected my power on oct 8, bill was not due til oct 25, have to go the whole weekend with no power because they don't work on weekends! This is outrageous! So even though this was an error on their part, I am left with no power, 4 kids, and a fridge of spoiled food, outrageous!”

Claimant Seeks: $0

Help resolve this case
Resolution Reward: 1000 points

“Strong Sub-Track Mutual Settlement”

  • Claim Status:
  • In Negotiation
  • Posted on: November 25,2010

Complaint Types: Questionable Business Practices, Service Problem

Claimant says: "I recently received a notice of complaint of class action settlements against Strong funds for their use of derivatives, late and excessive trading and market timing during the period of January 1, 1999-December 31, 2004. I have owned Strong funds during that period. And i wish to be part of the settlement.”

Claimant Seeks: $0

Help resolve this case
Resolution Reward: 1000 points

“Mutual Funds Litigation\Columbia Sub-Track”

  • Claim Status:
  • In Negotiation
  • Posted on: November 25,2010

Complaint Types: Questionable Business Practices

Claimant says: "I recently received a notice of complaint against varous Columbia funds which I owned between Nov.1,1998- February 25,2004 for various high risk investments concerning including market timing and derivatives. I owned shares of various Columbia"Acorn, and Columbia"Steinroe funds in both stocks and bonds.”

Claimant Seeks: $0

Help resolve this case
Resolution Reward: 1000 points

“Class action settlement for plaintives against Janus Mutual Funds”

  • Claim Status:
  • In Negotiation
  • Posted on: November 25,2010

Complaint Types: Questionable Business Practices

Claimant says: "I recently received a notice of class action lawsuit filed by Class and Derivatives Plaintiffs against Janus for their use of derivatives and other high risk investments and was instructed to file a claim by December 8, 2010 to be eligilbe to receive compensation. My name is Paul John Cinalli and I held Janus funds during the time period in litigation in Janus 20,WWGrowth, Enterprise and other Janus funds.Please mail any info and compensation to my home address on file.”

Claimant Seeks: $350

Help resolve this case
Resolution Reward: 1000 points

“Items stolen from vehicle”

  • Claim Status:
  • In Negotiation
  • Posted on: November 12,2010

Complaint Types: Questionable Business Practices

Claimant says: "any vehicle in service is always vulnerable to employees that service them. They can't be watched all the time, and it's easy to get away with. The dealer will always deny that it never happens. The customer is always out of luck. This is what was told to me from the officer that I filed a police report to.”

Claimant Seeks: $225

Help resolve this case
Resolution Reward: 1000 points

“ROLLX VANS claim for van with defective computer”

  • Claim Status:
  • In Negotiation
  • Posted on: November 05,2010

Complaint Types: I just feel ripped off., Questionable Business Practices, Service Problem, Warranties or Rebates

Claimant says: "Defective computer in wheelchair van caused the vehicle to kneel to the right and not return to level position. This cause the bottom of the to strike and object in the roadway thus causing damage to infloor ramp. The accident was reported on 8/08/10. The service tech did not arrive until later. The defective computer was replaced. Rollx acknowldge the defect but feel the kneeling van could not have caused the underneath collision. My spouse has a terminal illness (MS) and has been without transportation for nearly t” ...Show more »

Claimant Seeks: $13000

Help resolve this case
Resolution Reward: 1000 points

1 to 10 of 267 | Go To
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. 4
  6. 5
  7. 6
  8. »

*
PeopleClaim provides cost-efficient, self-directed online dispute resolution services for consumers, businesses and others. The information contained in any of the claims listed above or elsewhere on this site represents the opinion of the claiming party, and is not intended as a statement of actual fact or evidence of any wrongdoing. The responding party is invited to contest, comment, or otherwise respond to any statements made by the claiming party.

Respondents have the option to post publicly any rebuttal or clarification or to communicate privately with the claiming party any concerns, denials, or clarification regarding the matters addressed in this claim. Failure of a responding party to communicate any such concerns should not necessarily be viewed as admission or agreement to statements made by the claimant.