Resolve a dispute - It's FREE

Find complaint histories for businesses, professionals, and anyone else:

  • Help resolve a dispute:
  • Review the case
  • Propose your solution
  • Win the reward.

Claim type with most consumer complaints —
Damaged Property:

“Corporate Claims Managment, Inc. Dispute”

  • Claim Status:
  • In Negotiation
  • Posted on: December 18,2013

Complaint Types: Customer service runarounds, Damaged property, Problem with a service

Claimant says: "Ameren Electric came to our location on 10/20/13 to change their utility pole directly in front of our location. They did this during the night while no one was there. When we returned the next day we found breakers blown inside our breaker box. When we reset the breakers we found damage to our ballast and some bulbs in our front outside pole sign were blown out and one flat screen tv inside no longer worked. Both items were operated off the same breaker. Ameren had been planning on doing this and even had to have our f” ...Show more »

Claimant Seeks: $1879.62

“Target Shopping Cart Ongoing Complaint”

  • Claim Status:
  • In Negotiation
  • Posted on: November 05,2010

Complaint Types: Damaged Property

Claimant says: "Multiple Co-workers experiencing same problem of shopping carts rolling down the parking lot and hitting cars. Multiple complaints filed with Target to no avail.”

Claimant Seeks: $879.48


*
PeopleClaim provides cost-efficient, self-directed online dispute resolution services for consumers, businesses and others. The information contained in any of the claims listed above or elsewhere on this site represents the opinion of the claiming party, and is not intended as a statement of actual fact or evidence of any wrongdoing. The responding party is invited to contest, comment, or otherwise respond to any statements made by the claiming party.

Respondents have the option to post publicly any rebuttal or clarification or to communicate privately with the claiming party any concerns, denials, or clarification regarding the matters addressed in this claim. Failure of a responding party to communicate any such concerns should not necessarily be viewed as admission or agreement to statements made by the claimant.