Resolve a dispute - It's FREE

Find complaint histories for businesses, professionals, and anyone else:

  • Help resolve a dispute:
  • Review the case
  • Propose your solution
  • Win the reward.

Showing 2 matches for power juicer:

“Jack Lalanne Power Juicer-Dispute-#8703643”

  • Claim Status:
  • In Negotiation
  • Posted on: December 31,2012

Complaint Types: Customer service runarounds, Problem with a product, Problem with a service

Claimant says: "In October 2012, I purchased a power juicer base from Jack Lalanne (Tristar Products) as a replacement part because of a defecti in the original base purchased from Costco. I have been trying to resolve this problem with Jack Lalanne in Wallingford, Conn. They have made promises to resolve this issue but have not to this date gotten back in touch with me. They have sent me a base that does not work with other parts of the Juicer. They have made promises to send me a whole unit with all the parts. This has not happen as” ...Show more »

Claimant Seeks: $0

Help resolve this case
Resolution Reward: 1000 points

“power juicer-Dispute-#5548562”

  • Claim Status:
  • In Negotiation
  • Posted on: March 04,2011

Complaint Types: Poor value, Product Defect

Claimant says: "I called the company three times. and there.s a notice from the receipt stated that I need an Authorization number in order to return this Item. Therefore I need them to send me this Authorization number for me to return them the Item. Also I want the company to credit my account.”

Claimant Seeks: $129.78

Help resolve this case
Resolution Reward: 1000 points


*
PeopleClaim provides cost-efficient, self-directed online dispute resolution services for consumers, businesses and others. The information contained in any of the claims listed above or elsewhere on this site represents the opinion of the claiming party, and is not intended as a statement of actual fact or evidence of any wrongdoing. The responding party is invited to contest, comment, or otherwise respond to any statements made by the claiming party.

Respondents have the option to post publicly any rebuttal or clarification or to communicate privately with the claiming party any concerns, denials, or clarification regarding the matters addressed in this claim. Failure of a responding party to communicate any such concerns should not necessarily be viewed as admission or agreement to statements made by the claimant.