Resolve a dispute - It's FREE

Find complaint histories for businesses, professionals, and anyone else:

  • Help resolve a dispute:
  • Review the case
  • Propose your solution
  • Win the reward.

Showing 7 matches for hughesnet:

“My Claim vs. Hughes Net”

  • Claim Status:
  • In Negotiation
  • Posted on: March 05,2018

Complaint Types: Bad business practices, Overcharge or billing error, Problem with a service

Claimant says: "I had internet service installed in my home by Hughesnet. Since day one the service was terrible. Every two minutes the computer would jam up and buffer. I made four phone calls to try to correct this problem and upped my service plan twice to try to correct the problem. Hughes could not fix the buffering problem. Their service is the worst I have ever seen. I canceled the service after trying four times to fix it. Hughes has put charges on my credit card without any authorization from me. I refused to pay for a disco” ...Show more »

Claimant Seeks: $429.58

“My Claim vs. Hughesnet - Hughes Network Systems, Llc”

  • Claim Status:
  • In Negotiation
  • Posted on: July 20,2017

Complaint Types: I just feel ripped off., Bad business practices, Overcharge or billing error, Problem with a product, Problem with a service

Claimant says: "Claim edited 8/1/17 to include claim 1504803 plus update Grounds for this matter: 1.) Hughs Net assured me if I 'bundled' I would pay $29.29 plus tax for each service internet, TV, and phone. They couldn't tell me tax because each state is different. (I missed red flag) 2.) I asked if I should ask any question that I'm unaware of? No. At that time I was unaware Hughs net does not supply cable or satelite TV. At the instillation I was informed TV was a different company and bill. When I got that bill it was $” ...Show more »

Claimant Seeks: $1679.94

“Donald B vs. Hughesnet , P.O. Box 10, Chanhassen, Mn 55317”

  • Claim Status:
  • In Negotiation
  • Posted on: July 12,2017

Complaint Types: Commercial / Other dispute

Claimant says: "I have had their internet and phone service for a little over two weeks.  The user name given by the installer didn't work.  I got a second set of names by calling but that only worked for one day.  A second call provided a user name and password which I've been able to use to send emails but the standard email program on Windows 10 will not send emails.  I've spent about two hours on the phone trying to get problems resolved.  I have difficulty hearing which makes it difficult to solve problems” ...Show more »

Claimant Seeks: $34.97

“major screw up by hughes net vs. Hughes Network Systems, Llc”

  • Claim Status:
  • In Negotiation
  • Posted on: July 14,2016

Complaint Types: I just feel ripped off., Automatic subscription / membership renewal abuses, Bad business practices, Contract / Agreement dispute, Customer service runarounds, Failure to disclose facts, Failure to honor promises, Overcharge or billing error, Problem with a product, Problem with a service

Claimant says: "My problem with hughes net is that that charged my credit card in the amount of $118 on June 06,2016 this transaction wasn't approved by me. I call them to speak about my questions and concerns were i was rudely dealt with by one of there repersenatives. she begin to try amd explain to me that i authorized the automatic payment back in october of 2015. I then explained to her that if that was the case then they wouldnt have received the payment. because the visa card i started my account with them was no longer vaild. s” ...Show more »

Claimant Seeks: $4918

“hugesnet internet providor Dispute”

  • Claim Status:
  • In Negotiation
  • Posted on: June 29,2014

Complaint Types: I just feel ripped off., Contract / Agreement dispute, Customer service runarounds, Poor Value for Money

Claimant says: "Because I am already in a 17mth contract with them they tell me I cannot bundle my internet and tv with direct tv. can you help? I could save with the direct tv offer and they do business with direct tv. I have moved from co to mt and was downgraded from 10mb to 5 mb and charged the same monthly price of 71.15”

Claimant Seeks: $25.97

“hughes network systems-Dispute-#8058178”

  • Claim Status:
  • In Negotiation
  • Posted on: September 06,2012

Complaint Types: I just feel ripped off., Bad business practices, Contract / Agreement / Promise dispute, Customer service runarounds, Overcharge or billing error, Problem with a product, Problem with a service

Claimant says: "Hughes net's charge of $260.00 to disconnect their services when you are not satisfied with their services. This is an outrageous charge.”

Claimant Seeks: $7.95

“hughesnet-Dispute-#6781625”

  • Claim Status:
  • In Negotiation
  • Posted on: September 26,2011

Complaint Types: I just feel ripped off., Bad business practices, Contract / Agreement / Promise dispute, Customer service runarounds

Claimant says: "-I needed to get faster internet service rather than the dial up I had because i needed to take a class on line. After checking with avaliable carries in my area Hughes Net was the only company that serviced at my address. The whole process was a mess from the get go. They told me They would be at my residence on 7-20-11 which they canceled because thei tech's truck was broken down,then they said they would be here on 7-24-11 ,however that was canceled because they didn't have the equipement to install. I was planning o” ...Show more »

Claimant Seeks: $100


*
PeopleClaim provides cost-efficient, self-directed online dispute resolution services for consumers, businesses and others. The information contained in any of the claims listed above or elsewhere on this site represents the opinion of the claiming party, and is not intended as a statement of actual fact or evidence of any wrongdoing. The responding party is invited to contest, comment, or otherwise respond to any statements made by the claiming party.

Respondents have the option to post publicly any rebuttal or clarification or to communicate privately with the claiming party any concerns, denials, or clarification regarding the matters addressed in this claim. Failure of a responding party to communicate any such concerns should not necessarily be viewed as admission or agreement to statements made by the claimant.