Resolve a dispute - It's FREE

Find complaint histories for businesses, professionals, and anyone else:

  • Help resolve a dispute:
  • Review the case
  • Propose your solution
  • Win the reward.

Showing 2 matches for Wells Fargo Bank:

“My Claim vs. wells fargo bank in flagstaff az Dispute”

  • Claim Status:
  • In Negotiation
  • Posted on: February 14,2014

Complaint Types: Bad business practices, Contract / Agreement / Promise dispute, Overcharge or billing error

Claimant says: "I was misinformed -- perhaps deliberately -- about the costs associated with two new accounts I opened with the Wells Fargo Bank, Milton Road branch, Flagstaff AZ. I subsequently accumulated charges/fees of $76.65 on dormant accounts that I had been assured had no associated fees. Wells Fargo refuses to accept my accurate version of these accounts and their uninvited costs. The WF employee involved is either misremembering or lying about our consultation in order to support his employers.”

Claimant Seeks: $113.7

Help resolve this case
Resolution Reward: 1000 points

“Charged for unused service.”

  • Claim Status:
  • In Negotiation
  • Posted on: August 24,2010

Complaint Types: I just feel ripped off., Billing / Fees, Contract / Agreement, Poor Value for Money, Questionable Business Practices

Claimant says: "On 1/12/10 my checking account was charged $120.00 (10.00 per month) for a year's rental on my safe deposit box at the Wells Fargo Bank location noted in this complaint. I ended my lease on 8/6/10. Essentially, I used my safe deposit box for 7 months. I expected to be refunded for the 5 months I was charged and not receiving the benefit of storage in my box. I was told I would not be receiving a refund for my unused rental. I feel I was treated rudely and disrespectfully in addition to be stolen from in this transa” ...Show more »

Claimant Seeks: $100

Help resolve this case
Resolution Reward: 1000 points


*
PeopleClaim provides cost-efficient, self-directed online dispute resolution services for consumers, businesses and others. The information contained in any of the claims listed above or elsewhere on this site represents the opinion of the claiming party, and is not intended as a statement of actual fact or evidence of any wrongdoing. The responding party is invited to contest, comment, or otherwise respond to any statements made by the claiming party.

Respondents have the option to post publicly any rebuttal or clarification or to communicate privately with the claiming party any concerns, denials, or clarification regarding the matters addressed in this claim. Failure of a responding party to communicate any such concerns should not necessarily be viewed as admission or agreement to statements made by the claimant.