Resolve a dispute - It's FREE

Find complaint histories for businesses, professionals, and anyone else:

  • Help resolve a dispute:
  • Review the case
  • Propose your solution
  • Win the reward.

Showing 2 matches for UnitedCashLoans:

“United Loans”

  • Claim Status:
  • In Negotiation
  • Posted on: July 01,2011

Complaint Types: Bad business practices, Problem with a service

Claimant says: "I just want the $105.00 to be credited to my total amount due of $455. I feel as if this was un justly charged.”

Claimant Seeks: $105

“excessive money to be paid back from a person with dimentia and didn't know any better”

  • Claim Status:
  • In Negotiation
  • Posted on: October 13,2010

Complaint Types: I just feel ripped off., Billing / Fees, Questionable Business Practices

Claimant says: "My name is Mattie Triplett and i live at 2012 Stone Coal Rd. Garrett Ky. 41630.I have recently taken control of the financial situation in my home.I found that a loan was taken out on April 19th of this year for $400 and deposited in this bank account from the said above.The problem is this loan was supposively taken out by my husband Terry Triplett.I asked him about this,but he said he doesn't remember anything of this.I looked at our bank statements and i found where the money was deposited but i also found where six ” ...Show more »

Claimant Seeks: $125


*
PeopleClaim provides cost-efficient, self-directed online dispute resolution services for consumers, businesses and others. The information contained in any of the claims listed above or elsewhere on this site represents the opinion of the claiming party, and is not intended as a statement of actual fact or evidence of any wrongdoing. The responding party is invited to contest, comment, or otherwise respond to any statements made by the claiming party.

Respondents have the option to post publicly any rebuttal or clarification or to communicate privately with the claiming party any concerns, denials, or clarification regarding the matters addressed in this claim. Failure of a responding party to communicate any such concerns should not necessarily be viewed as admission or agreement to statements made by the claimant.