Resolve a dispute - It's FREE

Find complaint histories for businesses, professionals, and anyone else:

  • Help resolve a dispute:
  • Review the case
  • Propose your solution
  • Win the reward.

Showing 5 matches for Rescue Rooter:

“T.G. vs. Ars Rescue Rooter. (Aar)”

  • Claim Status:
  • In Negotiation
  • Posted on: March 31,2017

Complaint Types: Bad business practices, Customer service runarounds, Overcharge or billing error, Problem with a service

Claimant says: "Lennox Air Condition Warranty repairs were requested. I provided at Lennox Claim Number. Service was done on the unit and I was charged $320 for Freon to fill the unit. I was told that it was probably a slow leak since the unit was never serviced and that I would have to pay for the Freon. A month later the air conditioner quit cooling again even though it was rarely used. ARS looked at the unit but said that outside air temp was not hot enough for them to work on it. I was informed that if they came out again I would h” ...Show more »

Claimant Seeks: $327.99

“S.L. vs. Ars Rescue Rooter”

  • Claim Status:
  • In Negotiation
  • Posted on: April 25,2016

Complaint Types: I just feel ripped off., Bad business practices, Problem with a service

Claimant says: "On March 30, 2016 I received at service call to test and check my heating and A/C system. This was in response to their advertised $59 special. When I scheduled the appointment, I explained to the appointment Rep that I had a dual system and she said I would only be charged $59 to check both systems, but when the Tech arrived he said I needed to pay $59 for each. I did not argue the charge for the service, but then he said I needed to pay $89 to test for a leak. If I didn't want to pay the $89 charge for leak detection ” ...Show more »

Claimant Seeks: $7.99

“My Claim vs. Are Rescue Rooter”

  • Claim Status:
  • In Negotiation
  • Posted on: February 02,2016

Complaint Types: Overcharge or billing error

Claimant says: "I cold not get the pilot light to stay lit on a water heater in a rental house at 7818 E 48th st Indianapolis In. I called ARS on Dec 5, 2015 to repair the water heater that they installed on June 12, 2013. I was informed that the the part that was needed was under warranty, but the service call and labor to install the part was not. They replaced the high limit switch on the water heater and charged me $275.00 for the diagnostic fee and the installation. On January 16, 2015 the pilot light went out again. This time ” ...Show more »

Claimant Seeks: $282.99

“Rescue Rooter-Dispute-#1812274”

  • Claim Status:
  • In Negotiation
  • Posted on: July 29,2011

Complaint Types: I just feel ripped off., Bad business practices, Customer service runarounds

Claimant says: "I do not appreciate the plumber turning the water off below the sink and not telling me, I wanted to trust him and not check his work thinking he had some integrity but next time I will check the work they did, I did not stop payment on the check since I feel they should be paid a nominal amount for their time. The GM Tom is going to send the company into bankrupcy with his rude attitude and to tell me to open the yellow pages and find someone else was uncalled for.”

Claimant Seeks: $100

“Improper licensing for solar hot water heater/want rebates or money back/remove unit/make repairs”

  • Claim Status:
  • In Negotiation
  • Posted on: July 11,2010

Complaint Types: Contract / Agreement, Warranties or Rebates

Claimant says: "I Have the support of Michael Nieri from the Arizona Solar Industry, Geoff Sutton, who will be administrating the Solar Hot Water Inspection Program starting August 1,2010 and who has taken pictures of mistakes made with the installation of this unit, and Peter Barney who inspected this unit at my home and who is a master plumber. I can send you supporting pictures and comments by Geoff Suton if needed.”

Claimant Seeks: $9000


*
PeopleClaim provides cost-efficient, self-directed online dispute resolution services for consumers, businesses and others. The information contained in any of the claims listed above or elsewhere on this site represents the opinion of the claiming party, and is not intended as a statement of actual fact or evidence of any wrongdoing. The responding party is invited to contest, comment, or otherwise respond to any statements made by the claiming party.

Respondents have the option to post publicly any rebuttal or clarification or to communicate privately with the claiming party any concerns, denials, or clarification regarding the matters addressed in this claim. Failure of a responding party to communicate any such concerns should not necessarily be viewed as admission or agreement to statements made by the claimant.