Resolve a dispute - It's FREE

Find complaint histories for businesses, professionals, and anyone else:

  • Help resolve a dispute:
  • Review the case
  • Propose your solution
  • Win the reward.

Showing 2 matches for Real Property Management:

“Tracie Martin vs. Real Property Management Solutions”

  • Claim Status:
  • In Negotiation
  • Posted on: April 06,2017

Complaint Types: Automatic subscription / membership renewal abuses, Inadequate security ??? locks, alarms, lighting, etc., Other

Claimant says: "ATTN: PEOPLE COMPLAINTS X2 My name is Tracie Martin, this is the second time that I am sending this letter to you ( peoples complaints), I contacted you about one month about regarding my daughter and grandson, that lived at 750 SE 148TH ,97233for the last 11 years. She was given a 90 day no cause notice, as i said to you before Tanita spoke with the office person Alys, and asked why she was being evicted. She was told that they are going to remodel and everyone would be evacuating for the remodel. We later learned as” ...Show more »

Claimant Seeks: $4447.97

“Real Property Management-Dispute-#2048889”

  • Claim Status:
  • In Negotiation
  • Posted on: April 14,2012

Complaint Types: I just feel ripped off., Bad business practices, Customer service runarounds, Overcharge or billing error

Claimant says: "Real Property Management under the representation of Larry Anderson and Stacey Anderson placed tenants into my property even after our agreemen had been cancelled. They collected rent and security deposits and failed to remit the said monies to me since Feb 2012. When I signed up with them and handed over the keys after paying a non-refundable fee of $399 the house got got burgled with the windows smashed in and vandalised. RPM did not even notice until I came back into town and discovered this when I paid a visit. My ” ...Show more »

Claimant Seeks: $1314.89


*
PeopleClaim provides cost-efficient, self-directed online dispute resolution services for consumers, businesses and others. The information contained in any of the claims listed above or elsewhere on this site represents the opinion of the claiming party, and is not intended as a statement of actual fact or evidence of any wrongdoing. The responding party is invited to contest, comment, or otherwise respond to any statements made by the claiming party.

Respondents have the option to post publicly any rebuttal or clarification or to communicate privately with the claiming party any concerns, denials, or clarification regarding the matters addressed in this claim. Failure of a responding party to communicate any such concerns should not necessarily be viewed as admission or agreement to statements made by the claimant.