Resolve a dispute - It's FREE

Find complaint histories for businesses, professionals, and anyone else:

  • Help resolve a dispute:
  • Review the case
  • Propose your solution
  • Win the reward.

Showing 3 matches for Quick Weight Loss Center:

“Leah Howard vs. Quick Weight Loss Center”

  • Claim Status:
  • In Negotiation
  • Posted on: September 03,2018

Complaint Types: Bad business practices

Claimant says: "In January 2017. I purchased a quick weight program. I was only looking to get information that day. I was dealing with a GI infection. Carianna told me if did not purchase that day I would lose the new years special. Then she informed that I had to take all of the supplements which she handed in brown bag with me that same. These supplement contain soy and sugar substitutes that I am allergic to. These supplement is a great part of their program. I also was under medical treatment for my intestinal infection and told” ...Show more »

Claimant Seeks: $638.96

“Quick Weight Loss Center-Dispute-#4958193”

  • Claim Status:
  • In Negotiation
  • Posted on: January 03,2012

Complaint Types: I just feel ripped off., Bad business practices, Problem with a service

Claimant says: "I signed up for the program 6 days ago after high sales pressure and against my better judgement for their weight loss program. 589.00 out of pocket last Friday 12/16/11 for the start up kit and cost of the initial consultation and an additional 200.00 on Monday 12/19/11 for products that made me literally, sick to my stomach. I talked to my Doctor and was advised not to continue this program and when I talked to the Manager at the center I was told, that I was not eligible for a refund. No refund whatsoever, nothing. T” ...Show more »

Claimant Seeks: $789


*
PeopleClaim provides cost-efficient, self-directed online dispute resolution services for consumers, businesses and others. The information contained in any of the claims listed above or elsewhere on this site represents the opinion of the claiming party, and is not intended as a statement of actual fact or evidence of any wrongdoing. The responding party is invited to contest, comment, or otherwise respond to any statements made by the claiming party.

Respondents have the option to post publicly any rebuttal or clarification or to communicate privately with the claiming party any concerns, denials, or clarification regarding the matters addressed in this claim. Failure of a responding party to communicate any such concerns should not necessarily be viewed as admission or agreement to statements made by the claimant.