Resolve a dispute - It's FREE

Find complaint histories for businesses, professionals, and anyone else:

  • Help resolve a dispute:
  • Review the case
  • Propose your solution
  • Win the reward.

Showing 3 matches for Ivory White:

“Ivory White-Dispute-#1153885”

  • Claim Status:
  • In Negotiation
  • Posted on: May 27,2012

Complaint Types: I just feel ripped off., Bad business practices, Contract / Agreement / Promise dispute, Customer service runarounds, Problem with a service

Claimant says: "I filled out an on-line survey and also checked a box to receive a trial of Ivory White whitening for 99 cents.. My account was charged a 1.03 and then 3.87 fee.. In a few days I received a box with 2 packages of Ivory White.. 1st package was the trial the other was a normal package of ivory white. I assumed this is why my account was charged twice. I was on my online checking acct today when i saw another charge for ivory white in the amount of 78.41 which i did not authorize. When i called the company to ask why the c” ...Show more »

Claimant Seeks: $86.36

“Fraudulent Misrepresentation of return/cancellation policy”

  • Claim Status:
  • In Negotiation
  • Posted on: October 03,2010

Complaint Types: I just feel ripped off., Billing / Fees, Contract / Agreement, Marketing / Promotion, Policy, Questionable Business Practices, Warranties or Rebates

Claimant says: "Product ordered was part of a Publishers Clearing House offer. Product was received late which did not let me try it before cancelling. When I did so, I was told I was a day late. I still have the product which requires return, but am not doing so until I receive my Visa credit of $78.41. The company has a 4 page disclosure agreement which is at a minimum, cofusing, at at worst a fraudulent policy. Total misrepresentation. I believe that PCH is equally at fault and should be censured. Visa should also disassociate from ” ...Show more »

Claimant Seeks: $235.23


*
PeopleClaim provides cost-efficient, self-directed online dispute resolution services for consumers, businesses and others. The information contained in any of the claims listed above or elsewhere on this site represents the opinion of the claiming party, and is not intended as a statement of actual fact or evidence of any wrongdoing. The responding party is invited to contest, comment, or otherwise respond to any statements made by the claiming party.

Respondents have the option to post publicly any rebuttal or clarification or to communicate privately with the claiming party any concerns, denials, or clarification regarding the matters addressed in this claim. Failure of a responding party to communicate any such concerns should not necessarily be viewed as admission or agreement to statements made by the claimant.