Resolve a dispute - It's FREE

Find complaint histories for businesses, professionals, and anyone else:

  • Help resolve a dispute:
  • Review the case
  • Propose your solution
  • Win the reward.

Showing 3 matches for Hertz Rent A Car:

“P.N. vs. Hertz Car Rental Los Angeles Airport”

  • Claim Status:
  • In Negotiation
  • Posted on: September 24,2016

Complaint Types: Bad business practices, Problem with a service

Claimant says: "I have prepay the car on 7/11/2016 for 9/ 3 to 9/10/ 2016 220.97$ with American express thru priceline.com , but when 9/3/2016 I com to pick up they said they have no car I paid for available then they give bigger car , I have no choice I take it . when 9/10/2016 I return the car they charge me 196.88$ for upgrade , I call priceline.com customer service they tell me that according the policy between hertz and the priceline.com if the hertz have no car the customer paid for available at the time pick up they have to u” ...Show more »

Claimant Seeks: $204.87

“Hertz Dishonest Business Practice HURTS!”

  • Claim Status:
  • In Negotiation
  • Posted on: November 11,2013

Complaint Types: I just feel ripped off., Bad business practices, Contract / Agreement / Promise dispute, Customer service runarounds, Overcharge or billing error

Claimant says: "I had a standing reservation for SUV. During check in, clerk suggested a promotion by which I upgrade to luxury SUV and receive $200 upon return of vehicle. The clerk proceeded to run down the charges and total of $999.80. I said NO WAY, I'm not paying $1k for 1 week rental - if that's the price, I want my original reservation. The clerk told me wouldn't be the price because $200 discount would apply upon return - Total $799.80, Upon return my receipt that still said $999.80. I asked about the $200 promotion and was t” ...Show more »

Claimant Seeks: $451.91


*
PeopleClaim provides cost-efficient, self-directed online dispute resolution services for consumers, businesses and others. The information contained in any of the claims listed above or elsewhere on this site represents the opinion of the claiming party, and is not intended as a statement of actual fact or evidence of any wrongdoing. The responding party is invited to contest, comment, or otherwise respond to any statements made by the claiming party.

Respondents have the option to post publicly any rebuttal or clarification or to communicate privately with the claiming party any concerns, denials, or clarification regarding the matters addressed in this claim. Failure of a responding party to communicate any such concerns should not necessarily be viewed as admission or agreement to statements made by the claimant.