Resolve a dispute - It's FREE

Find complaint histories for businesses, professionals, and anyone else:

  • Help resolve a dispute:
  • Review the case
  • Propose your solution
  • Win the reward.

Showing 2 matches for Equitable Acceptance Corp:

“Equitable Acceptance Corp-Dispute-#5736227 I already told you everything what happened a few times and that contract is FRAUD!”

  • Claim Status:
  • In Negotiation
  • Posted on: January 18,2012

Complaint Types: I just feel ripped off.

Claimant says: "This is Janice Wood This is 2nd page. After I called E A on Nov. 7th and told them what happened on Oct. 28th. Joe put $2,743.70 instead of $1,400 on the contract and he signed my name himself. He never told us that the total would be $2,743.70. If he told us that the total would be $2,743.70, we would decline it IMMEDIATELY. He already knew that I already told him at Deaf Expo at Pleasanton Fairground on Oct. 8th and he really knew that he could not convince us to buy it if he told us that he would take $1,100 off fr” ...Show more »

Claimant Seeks: $0

“Equitable Acceptance Corp and Doug Stewart-Dispute-#2409568”

  • Claim Status:
  • In Negotiation
  • Posted on: January 17,2012

Complaint Types: I just feel ripped off., Contract / Agreement / Promise dispute

Claimant says: "I, Janice Wood, need your help as soon as possible. Joe Falsetta from San Diego videophoned us on Oct. 28th telling us that our 2007 Rainbow machine was really made in between 2004 and 2005 after I already told him at Deaf Expo at Pleasanton Fairground on Oct. 8th that I wanted to keep our 2007 machine and didn't want to buy a new one with complete unit for $2,499.95 because that price was too high after he told me that the shampoo machine couldn't connect to our 2007 machine after I asked him if the shampoo machine co” ...Show more »

Claimant Seeks: $0


*
PeopleClaim provides cost-efficient, self-directed online dispute resolution services for consumers, businesses and others. The information contained in any of the claims listed above or elsewhere on this site represents the opinion of the claiming party, and is not intended as a statement of actual fact or evidence of any wrongdoing. The responding party is invited to contest, comment, or otherwise respond to any statements made by the claiming party.

Respondents have the option to post publicly any rebuttal or clarification or to communicate privately with the claiming party any concerns, denials, or clarification regarding the matters addressed in this claim. Failure of a responding party to communicate any such concerns should not necessarily be viewed as admission or agreement to statements made by the claimant.