Resolve a dispute - It's FREE

Find complaint histories for businesses, professionals, and anyone else:

  • Help resolve a dispute:
  • Review the case
  • Propose your solution
  • Win the reward.

Showing 6 matches for Direct t.v.:

“Direct TV-Dispute-#5549964”

  • Claim Status:
  • In Negotiation
  • Posted on: October 30,2011

Complaint Types: I just feel ripped off., Customer service runarounds, Overcharge or billing error

Claimant says: "Billing problems with Direct TV they keep adding fees on to my account and won't take them off, , Also have a two year contract and don't want to keep them because there customer service depts stink? They never give you right price when you get your bill it always higher,If i break contact they want to charge you and they are always adding some type of fees if you change you service so you end up paying more.. I have nothing but problem with this company since I started with them they don't tell all about the fees t” ...Show more »

Claimant Seeks: $0

“Direct TV-Dispute-#3874814”

  • Claim Status:
  • In Negotiation
  • Posted on: October 11,2011

Complaint Types: Bad business practices, Contract / Agreement / Promise dispute, Problem with a service

Claimant says: "I recently had direct tv service install in which I was told I would recieve my local channels by the sales rep and his floor manager. I made it very clear that if I did not recieve these channels I did not want the service and again I was insured I would recieve these channels. Once the service was installed I did not have the local channels. I contacted direct tv and was told I would have to submit a waiver form, which was denied. So now I have the service without the channels that I specificly asked for. I then disco” ...Show more »

Claimant Seeks: $0

“direct tv run around”

  • Claim Status:
  • In Negotiation
  • Posted on: October 04,2011

Complaint Types: I just feel ripped off., Bad business practices, Contract / Agreement / Promise dispute, Customer service runarounds

Claimant says: "I was told when I called to check out their services that I would have everything that I had with Dish Network via the stations and 4 dvr televisons. I was told that would not be a problem and was included with the price she quoted me. Well we have noticed that we did not get that service. Only 1 tv records. And when I called I was told by 1 person it would be $99 to buy the boxes. Then when I said I wanted to talk to someone in their Arbitration department she said no problem she will get the boxes at no cost please h” ...Show more »

Claimant Seeks: $0

“directtv-Dispute-#3745379”

  • Claim Status:
  • In Negotiation
  • Posted on: September 21,2011

Complaint Types: Bad business practices

Claimant says: "the battle over level of pay my bill . billing for payment to my bill that will be credit to my account.those thing are equipment .”

Claimant Seeks: $170

“RIP OF BY PIRATICAL COMPANY : DIRECT TV”

  • Claim Status:
  • In Negotiation
  • Posted on: February 13,2011

Complaint Types: Bad business practices, Problem with a service

Claimant says: "i WOULD LIKE TO SEE BUSINESSES SUCH AS THIS ONE PUT COMPLETELY OUT OF BUSINESS AS IT SHOWS THEY ARE IN THIS BUSINESS ONLY FOR THE MONEY. IF YOU WILL READ : WWW.COMPLAINTBOARD.COM. YOU WILL BEGIN TO SEE WHAT PER CENT-AGE OF FORMER CUSTOMERS HAVE HAD SAME OR SIMILAR PROBLEMS WITH DIRECT TV.”

Claimant Seeks: $0


*
PeopleClaim provides cost-efficient, self-directed online dispute resolution services for consumers, businesses and others. The information contained in any of the claims listed above or elsewhere on this site represents the opinion of the claiming party, and is not intended as a statement of actual fact or evidence of any wrongdoing. The responding party is invited to contest, comment, or otherwise respond to any statements made by the claiming party.

Respondents have the option to post publicly any rebuttal or clarification or to communicate privately with the claiming party any concerns, denials, or clarification regarding the matters addressed in this claim. Failure of a responding party to communicate any such concerns should not necessarily be viewed as admission or agreement to statements made by the claimant.