Resolve a dispute - It's FREE

Find complaint histories for businesses, professionals, and anyone else:

  • Help resolve a dispute:
  • Review the case
  • Propose your solution
  • Win the reward.

Showing 2 matches for DW Scott Financial:

“D W Scott Financial-Dispute-#5836242”

  • Claim Status:
  • In Negotiation
  • Posted on: December 01,2012

Complaint Types: Unfulfilled promises

Claimant says: "I invested 3,000 dollars to become an affiliate with their company in 2010. I have not received a single penny in return. My calls to them have all gone unanswered.”

Claimant Seeks: $3022.9

“Affiliate Complaint - False Promises and Scammed out of Investment”

  • Claim Status:
  • In Negotiation
  • Posted on: July 05,2011

Complaint Types: Bad business practices

Claimant says: "This company is owned by Scott Walter or Walter Scott but the person that called me to become an affiliate with DW Scott Financial said he was the co-owner and promised I would make $68,243 in six months and said he would put it in writing and gave me his phone number but when I called him the next day to have him put it in writing his voice mail was full or he did not answer his phone. I talked to so many people from that company trying to get my money and the promises they made me. I have been paid $1200 for the inves” ...Show more »

Claimant Seeks: $79993


*
PeopleClaim provides cost-efficient, self-directed online dispute resolution services for consumers, businesses and others. The information contained in any of the claims listed above or elsewhere on this site represents the opinion of the claiming party, and is not intended as a statement of actual fact or evidence of any wrongdoing. The responding party is invited to contest, comment, or otherwise respond to any statements made by the claiming party.

Respondents have the option to post publicly any rebuttal or clarification or to communicate privately with the claiming party any concerns, denials, or clarification regarding the matters addressed in this claim. Failure of a responding party to communicate any such concerns should not necessarily be viewed as admission or agreement to statements made by the claimant.