Resolve a dispute - It's FREE

Find complaint histories for businesses, professionals, and anyone else:

  • Help resolve a dispute:
  • Review the case
  • Propose your solution
  • Win the reward.

Showing 2 matches for OfficeMax, Naperville, Illinois:

“OfficeMax-Dispute-#1391809”

  • Claim Status:
  • In Negotiation
  • Posted on: January 15,2013

Complaint Types: I just feel ripped off., Bad business practices, Problem with a service

Claimant says: "I purchased a new desktop computer set that was serviced by OfficeMax. It immediately started to freeze. At first I was told by two of their technicians and the Store Manager that this was a normal symptom but later indicated that I could avail myself of a free inspection. That free inspection cost me $136.42, the problem is worse than before and the Store Manager refused to refund my money. I filed a complaint with the Commonwealth of Virginia Attorney General and later with the BBB.”

Claimant Seeks: $136.42

Help resolve this case
Resolution Reward: 1000 points

“Office Max-Dispute-#1690603”

  • Claim Status:
  • In Negotiation
  • Posted on: August 17,2012

Complaint Types: I just feel ripped off., Bad business practices, Contract / Agreement / Promise dispute, Customer service runarounds, Overcharge or billing error

Claimant says: "After reading an ad in the local news paper, I saw an HP computer (10GBmemory,2TBhard drive) listed for $499.99. I went to the local store to purchase it. I was told that there was a misprint, and that they didn't have that model. So purchased the model that they did have. But with my checking the news paper, that ad has been in the paper for four weeks, without a disclaimer. Now, after reading this Sundays newspaper 8/5/2012, the ad was in there again. So I called the store again and asked for and spoke to the st” ...Show more »

Claimant Seeks: $25.89

Help resolve this case
Resolution Reward: 1000 points


*
PeopleClaim provides cost-efficient, self-directed online dispute resolution services for consumers, businesses and others. The information contained in any of the claims listed above or elsewhere on this site represents the opinion of the claiming party, and is not intended as a statement of actual fact or evidence of any wrongdoing. The responding party is invited to contest, comment, or otherwise respond to any statements made by the claiming party.

Respondents have the option to post publicly any rebuttal or clarification or to communicate privately with the claiming party any concerns, denials, or clarification regarding the matters addressed in this claim. Failure of a responding party to communicate any such concerns should not necessarily be viewed as admission or agreement to statements made by the claimant.