Resolve a dispute - It's FREE

Find complaint histories for businesses, professionals, and anyone else:

  • Help resolve a dispute:
  • Review the case
  • Propose your solution
  • Win the reward.

Showing 2 matches for Legend Auto Sales, Burien, Washington:

“Legend Auto Sales-Dispute-#4828076”

  • Claim Status:
  • In Negotiation
  • Posted on: November 25,2012

Complaint Types: Bad business practices

Claimant says: "since day one when i got my 2008 nissan titan from these dealer it didnt run as it supposed to be. i went to the auto repair shop here in alaska the mechanic said its a blown head gasket and the dealer sent me a check of $1200 for a good will repair. but it didnt fix my truck the mechanic said the truck is pretty beat up specially the engine the mechanic gave me an estimate of $6000 at least to replace the engine because theres more problems with the engine. all i want is my dream truck but it didnt work that way. than” ...Show more »

Claimant Seeks: $0

“legends auto inc-Dispute-#1831876”

  • Claim Status:
  • In Negotiation
  • Posted on: June 05,2012

Complaint Types: I just feel ripped off., Bad business practices, Customer service runarounds, Problem with a product, Problem with a service

Claimant says: "Purchashed a 2001 Nissan x terra and 33 days later the engine came apart while I was at pepboys. no sooner than when I pulled into their shop, Chris a mechanic told me to pop the hood and when he looked down we could see the pully laying on the ground. I called ledgend auto and at first they blew me off until I told them that I was towing it back to them then they sent it to a vpa auto company for repair and the man stated that the engine was no good so since I had a warranty the warranty company paid part and ledgend ” ...Show more »

Claimant Seeks: $25.89


*
PeopleClaim provides cost-efficient, self-directed online dispute resolution services for consumers, businesses and others. The information contained in any of the claims listed above or elsewhere on this site represents the opinion of the claiming party, and is not intended as a statement of actual fact or evidence of any wrongdoing. The responding party is invited to contest, comment, or otherwise respond to any statements made by the claiming party.

Respondents have the option to post publicly any rebuttal or clarification or to communicate privately with the claiming party any concerns, denials, or clarification regarding the matters addressed in this claim. Failure of a responding party to communicate any such concerns should not necessarily be viewed as admission or agreement to statements made by the claimant.