Resolve a dispute - It's FREE

Find complaint histories for businesses, professionals, and anyone else:

  • Help resolve a dispute:
  • Review the case
  • Propose your solution
  • Win the reward.

Claim type with most consumer complaints —
Abort Treatment:

“Bunker Hill Pediatric Dentistry, PLLC-Dispute-#1568410”

  • Claim Status:
  • In Negotiation
  • Posted on: April 07,2012

Complaint Types: Abort Treatment, Failure to Communicate with Patient or Patient???s Relatives, Failure to Disclose Risks Associated with a Treatment or Prescription, Failure to Prescribe Most Cost-efficient Treatment, Negligence, Patient Neglect at Health Facility, Poor Bedside Manner, Refusal to Treat Patient in Timely Manner, Side Effects

Claimant says: "I hope you will take this complaint in the helpful spirit in which is meant. I know you will want to see that such as incident does not occur again. I'm concerned about Mrs. Linh ,Luu DDS angry, abusive manner, with a seven year old child during a treatment at her facility. I strongly oppose to her position to providing unprofessional dental treatment. Treated my daughter like a animal for long period of hours hiding in a close treatment room. Top Dentistaboard just to make money not concern about patients far most im” ...Show more »

Claimant Seeks: $686736

Help resolve this case
Resolution Reward: 1000 points


*
PeopleClaim provides cost-efficient, self-directed online dispute resolution services for consumers, businesses and others. The information contained in any of the claims listed above or elsewhere on this site represents the opinion of the claiming party, and is not intended as a statement of actual fact or evidence of any wrongdoing. The responding party is invited to contest, comment, or otherwise respond to any statements made by the claiming party.

Respondents have the option to post publicly any rebuttal or clarification or to communicate privately with the claiming party any concerns, denials, or clarification regarding the matters addressed in this claim. Failure of a responding party to communicate any such concerns should not necessarily be viewed as admission or agreement to statements made by the claimant.