Resolve a dispute - It's FREE

Find complaint histories for businesses, professionals, and anyone else:

  • Help resolve a dispute:
  • Review the case
  • Propose your solution
  • Win the reward.

Showing 3 matches for aerus:

“My Claim vs. Matt 253 474-9202”

  • Claim Status:
  • In Negotiation
  • Posted on: November 12,2016

Complaint Types: Bad business practices

Claimant says: "Bought products from Electrolux vacuums. Products not working after supposedly being serviced. They are refusing to return and fix the problem. oct 31 2016”

Claimant Seeks: $27.97

“My Claim vs. Aerus Electrolux, Pittsfield, Ma Dispute”

  • Claim Status:
  • In Negotiation
  • Posted on: November 23,2014

Complaint Types: I just feel ripped off., Bad business practices, Failure to honor promises, Poor Value for Money, Problem with a product, Problem with a service

Claimant says: "I have purchased three products (call me stupid or easy mark) amounting to around $4000, which I am not able to afford easily. I bought a large air sanitizer first, because I have a respiratory ailment....Okay?...I guess. Next the fellow came back to replace a filter, which I thought a bit early, but ended up paying somewhere in the $100 area....Next, I was told of the water purifier for my drinking water ($1000 and change) and the laundry pure machine ($1000) to attach to my washer, which I'm afraid may be affecting th” ...Show more »

Claimant Seeks: $1020.97

“aerus bad sales”

  • Claim Status:
  • In Negotiation
  • Posted on: December 18,2010

Complaint Types: I just feel ripped off., Bad business or marketing practices

Claimant says: "it was sold to us late wensday afternoon the contract stated a 3 day return of product witch only leaves fri and sat you dont get the rest of your finance info for five days that say it will take 12 years and 4000 dollars to pay it off”

Claimant Seeks: $2


*
PeopleClaim provides cost-efficient, self-directed online dispute resolution services for consumers, businesses and others. The information contained in any of the claims listed above or elsewhere on this site represents the opinion of the claiming party, and is not intended as a statement of actual fact or evidence of any wrongdoing. The responding party is invited to contest, comment, or otherwise respond to any statements made by the claiming party.

Respondents have the option to post publicly any rebuttal or clarification or to communicate privately with the claiming party any concerns, denials, or clarification regarding the matters addressed in this claim. Failure of a responding party to communicate any such concerns should not necessarily be viewed as admission or agreement to statements made by the claimant.