Resolve a dispute - It's FREE

Find complaint histories for businesses, professionals, and anyone else:

  • Help resolve a dispute:
  • Review the case
  • Propose your solution
  • Win the reward.

Showing 2 matches for Websites4america:

“fraud”

  • Claim Status:
  • In Negotiation
  • Posted on: November 11,2011

Complaint Types: I just feel ripped off., Bad business practices, Contract / Agreement / Promise dispute, Customer service runarounds

Claimant says: "In July of 2010 I paid $7,500.00 to become an 'affiliate' with this company, paying for 7,500 'leads' which were to be completely handled by their agents and I would receive monthly residual checks for each of the sign ups and each use of the IBA credit card service. I received one hastily handwritten check for $50.00 in a handwritten envelope the week following my complaint in September of 2010, which I considered a 'shut up' check, I have called several times since and have always been told that they were in the pro” ...Show more »

Claimant Seeks: $7500

“Websites4america-Dispute-#7327027”

  • Claim Status:
  • In Negotiation
  • Posted on: June 17,2011

Complaint Types: I just feel ripped off., Bad business practices, Contract / Agreement / Promise dispute, criminal robbery, Customer service runarounds, Problem with a service, Product Defect

Claimant says: "I do not know the full extent of the victims involved, but it has been nation wide and could number in the thousands? Duplicate scam of leslie mersky also from Phoenix ....aka bankcard empire fraud.”

Claimant Seeks: $14110.27


*
PeopleClaim provides cost-efficient, self-directed online dispute resolution services for consumers, businesses and others. The information contained in any of the claims listed above or elsewhere on this site represents the opinion of the claiming party, and is not intended as a statement of actual fact or evidence of any wrongdoing. The responding party is invited to contest, comment, or otherwise respond to any statements made by the claiming party.

Respondents have the option to post publicly any rebuttal or clarification or to communicate privately with the claiming party any concerns, denials, or clarification regarding the matters addressed in this claim. Failure of a responding party to communicate any such concerns should not necessarily be viewed as admission or agreement to statements made by the claimant.