Resolve a dispute - It's FREE

Find complaint histories for businesses, professionals, and anyone else:

  • Help resolve a dispute:
  • Review the case
  • Propose your solution
  • Win the reward.

Showing 2 matches for PC Richards & Sons:

“G.G. vs. Eric& Martin”

  • Claim Status:
  • In Negotiation
  • Posted on: October 24,2017

Complaint Types: I just feel ripped off., This feels like a scam to me., Bad business practices, Customer service runarounds, Failure to honor promises, Poor Value for Money, Problem with a product

Claimant says: "I Mr.Gazzie Glenn purchased a deep freezer on 9-26-17 which I was decieve myself by sale person name eric, Martin .manager,I recieved deep freezer on 10-7-17, when I receive it i call and told management on the same day and every other day until today which is 10-12-17,Pc Richard has decieve myself by manager Martin & eric. Located 5200 kennedy blvd. West New york, nj 07093 # 201-348-6400.0”

Claimant Seeks: $800

Help resolve this case
Resolution Reward: 1000 points

“PC Richards & Sons-Dispute-#1121217”

  • Claim Status:
  • In Negotiation
  • Posted on: March 22,2012

Complaint Types: I just feel ripped off., Bad business practices

Claimant says: "ON 2/22/2012 AT THE PC RICHARDS & SONS STORE AT ATLANTIC AVE IN BROOKLYN , NY.I EXPLAIN TO THE CLERK I ALREADY HAVE A STORE CREDIT CARD (ENDING 2763) BUT I LOST THE CARD. MY ACCOUNT IS STILL ACTIVE AND I WANTED TO PURCHASE A IPOD. HE CAN VERIFY MY CARD BY PHONE. THE CLERK OPEN A NEW CARD (ENDING 2868) IN MY NAME. HE WAS TOLD MANY TIMES I ALREADY HAVE A STORE CARD. I RECEIVED THE NEW CARD IN THE MAIL.”

Claimant Seeks: $0

Help resolve this case
Resolution Reward: 1000 points


*
PeopleClaim provides cost-efficient, self-directed online dispute resolution services for consumers, businesses and others. The information contained in any of the claims listed above or elsewhere on this site represents the opinion of the claiming party, and is not intended as a statement of actual fact or evidence of any wrongdoing. The responding party is invited to contest, comment, or otherwise respond to any statements made by the claiming party.

Respondents have the option to post publicly any rebuttal or clarification or to communicate privately with the claiming party any concerns, denials, or clarification regarding the matters addressed in this claim. Failure of a responding party to communicate any such concerns should not necessarily be viewed as admission or agreement to statements made by the claimant.