Resolve a dispute - It's FREE

Find complaint histories for businesses, professionals, and anyone else:

  • Help resolve a dispute:
  • Review the case
  • Propose your solution
  • Win the reward.

Showing 2 matches for LG Fences, Inc:

“My Claim vs. LG Fences, Inc Dispute”

  • Claim Status:
  • In Negotiation
  • Posted on: December 14,2013

Complaint Types: I just feel ripped off., Bad business practices, Contract / Agreement / Promise dispute, Problem with a service

Claimant says: "I GIVE A JOB TO LG FENCE The owner of LG Fences, Inc. Mr. Luis Garcia is a scammer. He stole our deposit of $1800 for our fence never done. LG Fences, Inc. is a fraudulent business and his owner is a delinquent. I CALL HIM ABOUT MORE THAN 600 TIMES IN 3 MONTHS ... UNIL JULY 2013 THE JOB WAS NEVER FIISH”

Claimant Seeks: $7.99

“LG Fences, Inc FRAUD Luis Garcia with Licence CC#02-10554”

  • Claim Status:
  • In Negotiation
  • Posted on: April 26,2012

Complaint Types: Bad business practices, Contract / Agreement / Promise dispute

Claimant says: "We paid LG Fences (Luis Garcia) $5302.57 back in October 2011 for a new fence installation in our house in Miramar. To this date 4/14/12 he has not installed the fence. He came and partially installed about 5% of the total fence and left strings and materials exposed in our property which makes it very dangerous for 2 year old son to go the backyard and for neighbor pets as well. He is not returning my calls at this point. He over promised about the installation dates and lies about completion (e.g. death in the famil” ...Show more »

Claimant Seeks: $5310.52


*
PeopleClaim provides cost-efficient, self-directed online dispute resolution services for consumers, businesses and others. The information contained in any of the claims listed above or elsewhere on this site represents the opinion of the claiming party, and is not intended as a statement of actual fact or evidence of any wrongdoing. The responding party is invited to contest, comment, or otherwise respond to any statements made by the claiming party.

Respondents have the option to post publicly any rebuttal or clarification or to communicate privately with the claiming party any concerns, denials, or clarification regarding the matters addressed in this claim. Failure of a responding party to communicate any such concerns should not necessarily be viewed as admission or agreement to statements made by the claimant.