Resolve a dispute - It's FREE

Find complaint histories for businesses, professionals, and anyone else:

  • Help resolve a dispute:
  • Review the case
  • Propose your solution
  • Win the reward.

Showing 2 matches for Innovative Business Advantages:

“fraud”

  • Claim Status:
  • In Negotiation
  • Posted on: November 11,2011

Complaint Types: I just feel ripped off., Bad business practices, Contract / Agreement / Promise dispute, Customer service runarounds

Claimant says: "In July of 2010 I paid $7,500.00 to become an 'affiliate' with this company, paying for 7,500 'leads' which were to be completely handled by their agents and I would receive monthly residual checks for each of the sign ups and each use of the IBA credit card service. I received one hastily handwritten check for $50.00 in a handwritten envelope the week following my complaint in September of 2010, which I considered a 'shut up' check, I have called several times since and have always been told that they were in the pro” ...Show more »

Claimant Seeks: $7500

“My money back and stress, paper work at court house and talking to Lawyer intern!”

  • Claim Status:
  • In Negotiation
  • Posted on: June 15,2010

Complaint Types: Questionable Business Practices

Claimant says: "Very simple! Gary Wyatt lied to me in the beginning! He said give me 5 names a week and I guarantee we will sell 4 of the 5 ! Then after the fact, I signed computer generated form and then in couple days, I keep calling the company and most times would get answering machine saying , leave your name and number two times and we will get back to you in 24hrs! This went on for about four days and finally got Brian West who told me that Gary Wyatt didn't know what he was talking about, that it didn't work like he said! I hav” ...Show more »

Claimant Seeks: $595


*
PeopleClaim provides cost-efficient, self-directed online dispute resolution services for consumers, businesses and others. The information contained in any of the claims listed above or elsewhere on this site represents the opinion of the claiming party, and is not intended as a statement of actual fact or evidence of any wrongdoing. The responding party is invited to contest, comment, or otherwise respond to any statements made by the claiming party.

Respondents have the option to post publicly any rebuttal or clarification or to communicate privately with the claiming party any concerns, denials, or clarification regarding the matters addressed in this claim. Failure of a responding party to communicate any such concerns should not necessarily be viewed as admission or agreement to statements made by the claimant.