Resolve a dispute - It's FREE

Find complaint histories for businesses, professionals, and anyone else:

  • Help resolve a dispute:
  • Review the case
  • Propose your solution
  • Win the reward.

Showing 2 matches for House of Angels:

“House of Angels-Dispute-#4493352”

  • Claim Status:
  • In Negotiation
  • Posted on: April 09,2012

Complaint Types: I just feel ripped off., Bad business practices, Problem with a product

Claimant says: "I brought a nameplate and namebracelet. I went to have the name bracelet appraised and was told it was gold filled instead of ten caret gold. I went back to house of angels and was told that it was not their merchandise.”

Claimant Seeks: $389.95

Help resolve this case
Resolution Reward: 1000 points

“House OF Angels-Dispute-#1736720”

  • Claim Status:
  • In Negotiation
  • Posted on: April 04,2012

Complaint Types: Problem with a product, Problem with a service

Claimant says: "i purchased two pieces of jewelry and when I got the bracelet appraised was told by another company it was gold filled. Went to house of angel and was told I did not purchase item there. I requested my credit card statement which has house of angel with a purchase of 357.00. I want both pieces returned because the necklace is probably a fake as well and I did not like literally being called a liar.”

Claimant Seeks: $382

Help resolve this case
Resolution Reward: 1000 points


*
PeopleClaim provides cost-efficient, self-directed online dispute resolution services for consumers, businesses and others. The information contained in any of the claims listed above or elsewhere on this site represents the opinion of the claiming party, and is not intended as a statement of actual fact or evidence of any wrongdoing. The responding party is invited to contest, comment, or otherwise respond to any statements made by the claiming party.

Respondents have the option to post publicly any rebuttal or clarification or to communicate privately with the claiming party any concerns, denials, or clarification regarding the matters addressed in this claim. Failure of a responding party to communicate any such concerns should not necessarily be viewed as admission or agreement to statements made by the claimant.