Resolve a dispute - It's FREE

Find complaint histories for businesses, professionals, and anyone else:

  • Help resolve a dispute:
  • Review the case
  • Propose your solution
  • Win the reward.

Showing 3 matches for Greenway:

“J.E. vs. Mercedes-Benz of Houston Greenway - AutoNation, Inc. 3900 Southwest Fwy”

  • Claim Status:
  • In Negotiation
  • Posted on: May 09,2017

Complaint Types: Bad business practices, Customer service runarounds, Problem with a product, Problem with a service

Claimant says: "I have sufferred undue stress and emotionall duress for the last 2 years due to a new service mangaer  refusing to service my car and provide a loaner car for my warrantied car. On April 15, 2017, I was abused by the service staff and was threatened by them with their calling the police. I now find out that they reorted me to the Texas State Medical Board and Have put me at risk for losing my medical license due to an outsideconflict which has nothing to do with medical care. ”

Claimant Seeks: $14.99

“greenway painting Dispute #3022909”

  • Claim Status:
  • In Negotiation
  • Posted on: September 17,2013

Complaint Types: I just feel ripped off., Bad business practices, Contract / Agreement / Promise dispute, Customer service runarounds, Overcharge or billing error, Problem with a product, Problem with a service

Claimant Seeks: $842.97


*
PeopleClaim provides cost-efficient, self-directed online dispute resolution services for consumers, businesses and others. The information contained in any of the claims listed above or elsewhere on this site represents the opinion of the claiming party, and is not intended as a statement of actual fact or evidence of any wrongdoing. The responding party is invited to contest, comment, or otherwise respond to any statements made by the claiming party.

Respondents have the option to post publicly any rebuttal or clarification or to communicate privately with the claiming party any concerns, denials, or clarification regarding the matters addressed in this claim. Failure of a responding party to communicate any such concerns should not necessarily be viewed as admission or agreement to statements made by the claimant.