Resolve a dispute - It's FREE

Find complaint histories for businesses, professionals, and anyone else:

  • Help resolve a dispute:
  • Review the case
  • Propose your solution
  • Win the reward.

Showing 2 matches for Citadel Servicing Corporation:

“My Claim vs. Citadel Servicing Corporation”

  • Claim Status:
  • In Negotiation
  • Posted on: October 04,2017

Complaint Types: Bad business practices, Customer service runarounds, Overcharge or billing error, Problem with a service

Claimant says: "Citadel submitted a phone by ck incorrectly causing the payment to be delayed and now after speaking with David Trujillo (customer service representative and supposed supervisor) I am livid. This person tried to turn their obvious fault into my culpability. This person repeatedly tried to speak over me and not listen to what I was saying. I want someone higher up in this company to call me at 760 622-8775 Thanking you in advance, David Bracamontes”

Claimant Seeks: $14.99

Help resolve this case
Resolution Reward: 1000 points

“Citadel Servicing Corporation-Dispute-#1059690”

  • Claim Status:
  • In Negotiation
  • Posted on: January 11,2012

Complaint Types: Bad business practices, Contract / Agreement / Promise dispute

Claimant says: "Property was foreclosed on. I signed paperwork stating that the company would pay me $2000 if I cleaned the place up and within a certain amount of time. I did that. I have never received the money and I think the company used that to force me out of the property.”

Claimant Seeks: $3000

Help resolve this case
Resolution Reward: 1000 points


*
PeopleClaim provides cost-efficient, self-directed online dispute resolution services for consumers, businesses and others. The information contained in any of the claims listed above or elsewhere on this site represents the opinion of the claiming party, and is not intended as a statement of actual fact or evidence of any wrongdoing. The responding party is invited to contest, comment, or otherwise respond to any statements made by the claiming party.

Respondents have the option to post publicly any rebuttal or clarification or to communicate privately with the claiming party any concerns, denials, or clarification regarding the matters addressed in this claim. Failure of a responding party to communicate any such concerns should not necessarily be viewed as admission or agreement to statements made by the claimant.