Resolve a dispute - It's FREE

Find complaint histories for businesses, professionals, and anyone else:

  • Help resolve a dispute:
  • Review the case
  • Propose your solution
  • Win the reward.

Claim type with most consumer complaints —
Lost or damaged personal items:

“Super 8 Dispute”

  • Claim Status:
  • In Negotiation
  • Posted on: July 24,2015

Complaint Types: I just feel ripped off., Customer service runarounds, Lost or damaged personal items, Poor Value for Money, Poor/inadequate accommodations, Reservations not honored

Claimant says: "Could not get into the room, had front desk reprogram the cards 3 times, the fourth time we just opened the door with a credit card because the lock was broken, there were only 2 lights that worked, in the wall where the a/c should be there was a hole in the wall that you could see right outside, the fire detector was hanging from the ceiling with the wires all pulled, the micro was broken, holes in the wall and in the bathroom door like someone punched it. VERY dirty- cob webs and pop sprayed on the walls, remote didn” ...Show more »

Claimant Seeks: $79.97

“Expedia Inc (Travel) Dispute”

  • Claim Status:
  • In Negotiation
  • Posted on: October 10,2014

Complaint Types: I just feel ripped off., Contract / Agreement dispute, Lost or damaged personal items

Claimant says: "on the 17 sept 2014, I booked a hotel using experia inc travel, under the agreement of 1 room for 4 people and another room for 4 people and one child the price for this was agreed on, and then taken out of my account .after the comfirmation I received and email with the itinerary and noticed that is was not what was agreed upon .I call expedia too many time , to fit the issue, and theywere not able and provide the service they agreed upon .I have a reference number 185526306467 . was charged 2,380.24”

Claimant Seeks: $2406.21

“Southwest Airlines Co Dispute”

  • Claim Status:
  • In Negotiation
  • Posted on: July 22,2014

Complaint Types: I just feel ripped off., Bad business practices, Lost or damaged personal items, Overcharged, Personal injury, Problem with a service

Claimant says: "I purchased 2 tickets to go from Los Angeles to San Francisco on June 4 to fly in August of 2013 Due to my wifes back we had to cancel. At that time we were told that we had one year to use the tickets. When I called I was told that the year expired in June and that I would be granted six months to use the tickets,and would lose $100.00. I was treated poorly by each of the people I spoke with. The names of these people are Courtney, Lola, and Patrick who I found rude. I have no reason to ever fly Southwest again and I ” ...Show more »

Claimant Seeks: $435.56

“AMERICAN AIRLINE-Dispute-#3750948”

  • Claim Status:
  • In Negotiation
  • Posted on: July 02,2012

Complaint Types: I just feel ripped off., Lost or damaged personal items, Overcharged

Claimant says: "I was on flight AA 267 19 June at 6:15 pm flying out of Los Angeles to Honolulu. Before boarding our fight. An flight ticket agent has overhead page Justin Payne (15 year old who was flying with me) and my self (Craig Day) to ask if we could changes our seats to exit seat, from our original seats 27e and 27f (window seat). I agree (thinking there were exit seat) after boarding the plane and finding out the seat were not exit seat, (10 D and E) I approach the flight attending, who did not have a name tag on. His reply ” ...Show more »

Claimant Seeks: $675.89


*
PeopleClaim provides cost-efficient, self-directed online dispute resolution services for consumers, businesses and others. The information contained in any of the claims listed above or elsewhere on this site represents the opinion of the claiming party, and is not intended as a statement of actual fact or evidence of any wrongdoing. The responding party is invited to contest, comment, or otherwise respond to any statements made by the claiming party.

Respondents have the option to post publicly any rebuttal or clarification or to communicate privately with the claiming party any concerns, denials, or clarification regarding the matters addressed in this claim. Failure of a responding party to communicate any such concerns should not necessarily be viewed as admission or agreement to statements made by the claimant.