Search through claim backgrounds on thousands of companies, professionals and people.

Showing 3 matches for first energy solutions:

first energy solutions

  • Industry: :N/A
  • No. of Employees:
  • Sector: N/A
  • Est. Yearly Revenue:
  • Senior Officer(s):

Claim in negotiation

This party doesn’t have any unresolved complaints. This means that no claims have been file yet or Verizon Wireless has successfully resolved all of them.
File a claim »

First energy solutions

  • Industry: :N/A
  • No. of Employees:
  • Sector: N/A
  • Est. Yearly Revenue:
  • Senior Officer(s):

Claim in negotiation

This party doesn’t have any unresolved complaints. This means that no claims have been file yet or Verizon Wireless has successfully resolved all of them.
File a claim »

PUCO and First Energy Solutions and Arland Smith, FES

  • Industry: :N/A
  • No. of Employees:
  • Sector: N/A
  • Est. Yearly Revenue:
  • Senior Officer(s):

“My Claim vs. PUCO and First Energy Solutions and Arland Smith, FES-Dispute-#1160780”

  • Claim Status:
  • In Negotiation
  • Posted on:

Complaint Types:

Claimant says:" Energy Buyers switching to new CHOICE SUPPLIERS in Ohio get letters of \OTHERS VOTED OR SIGNED\ about a penalty of $300.oo these mentioned clients NEVER SIGNED FOR nor can easily discuss!*”

Claimant Seeks: $


*
PeopleClaim provides cost-efficient, self-directed online dispute resolution services for consumers, businesses and others. The information contained in any of the claims listed above or elsewhere on this site represents the opinion of the claiming party, and is not intended as a statement of actual fact or evidence of any wrongdoing. The responding party is invited to contest, comment, or otherwise respond to any statements made by the claiming party.

Respondents have the option to post publicly any rebuttal or clarification or to communicate privately with the claiming party any concerns, denials, or clarification regarding the matters addressed in this claim. Failure of a responding party to communicate any such concerns should not necessarily be viewed as admission or agreement to statements made by the claimant.