PeopleClaim helps resolve consumer and commercial complaints against businesses,
professionals, government agencies, or individuals by exposing bad business practices
and unfair treatment. Aggrieved parties are invited to use PeopleClaim's dispute
resolution process free of charge or choose premium options that may help resolve
Claimant's opinion: There is a existing problem with the rear differentials on the 2005 Titan and you cant buy the parts you have to buy the whole rear differential 4,000.00
Claimant's opinion: Again Nissan is the only one who wont sell parts for the rear end they make you buy the whole assembly. Instead of a couple hundred dollars it is 4,000.00
The rear differential went out on my 2005 Nissan Titan and when the mechanic calls all Nissan garages they won't sell just the gears needed they tell us that you have to buy the whole assembly and it is 4,000.00 My mechanic says any other company you can buy just the parts but Nissan will not allow it. How can they be allowed to do this ? The part would be a couple hundred dollars if they sold it that way. How can they expect people to have that kind of money laying around, plus Nissan knows there is trouble with the rear differentials on the 2005 Titan but are not willing to do anything about it now. The truck only has 102,000 miles on and has never towed anything or hauled heavy weight, just used to get back and forth to work. So they know of an existing problem but continue to price gouge the public and there is nothing we can do about it.
This claim will remain posted until resolved.
I truly did not expect anything from your company because you are making too much money ripping everyone off. But believe me I am not done with this and will never buy another Nissan product and will make sure to let people know through social media and other avenues how shitty of a company you really have at Nissan. I am not letting this drop... believe me.
We appreciate Mr. Benner contacting Nissan North America regarding his 2005 Titan and allowing us the opportunity to review his situation. NNA provides a New Vehicle Limited Warranty to cover repairs needed to correct defects in materials or workmanship up to 36,000 miles or 36 months, whichever occurs. From the information Mr. Benner provided in April 2016, his vehicle was approximately nine years and 66,000 miles outside of the warranty, but because NNA is dedicated to winning lifetime customers, we review for financial assistance on a case by case basis. We have reviewed all of the information specific to Mr. Benner’s situation and determined we are not in a position to offer any assistance for the rear differential repair. Our position was provided to Mr. Benner directly on April 21, 2016.
I am not asking for assistance !! I wanted an answer as to why they make you buy the whole rear assembly, instead of just the gears like all the other manufacturers do, especially since they know there has been an issue with these rear ends from new. I never asked for money just wanted to pay 400.00 instead of 4000.00. Again it is fine I will never own another Nissan their product and policies suck.
Contributed by Fran F. Paralegal - On: 10/04/2016
Parts for differentials (gears etc.) are quite commonly available for other cars. I believe the OP's complaint is that he had to buy the full differential assembly rather than buying just the bits that were broken. $4,000 is a lot to spend on a 2005 truck, especially if he'd have only been in the hole for a few hundred dollars with any other make of truck.
The 2005 Nissan Titan rear differential seems to be a common problem. I googled it and LemonLaw shows tons of complaints.
I was interested in the expert comments from Joseph H and Nissan, but I think that Nissan could do more to explain why they chose to make only a full assembly available rather than component parts. If repair standards (as mentioned by Joseph H) are an issue, I'd like to know that and also know what failures were anticipated or experienced for parts-only repairs.
As I look at replacing my current car, I have mixed feelings on Nissan's response. It's good to see that Nissan is following the discussion and keeping tabs on what its customers are experiencing, but I'm also now a little wary about potential large bills for any Nissan car I consider buying. I always buy new and then keep cars for a long time, so longevity and annual cost of ownership is important to me.
Joseph H's question and comment bring up some key points. It's valuable to get insight into this situation from someone with inside knowledge and long experience. (Small point: I would classify this not so much a solution as necessary questions before a recommendation can be made for what a settlement ought to be.)
The claimant says his mechanic singled out Nissan as being alone in its adherence to the full-assembly-replacement approach – which, if accurate, would seem to say that other manufacturers are finding a way to deal with this type of repair that's more economical for owners. So maybe there's a basic difference in philosophy between Nissan and the others –and it's one that buyers might want to be aware of before making a purchase if they're thinking of long-term ownership.
Contributed by Joseph H. Over 30 Years Automotive Aftermarket Repair , Industry Standards & Regulatory Compliance, - On: 10/03/2016
Also, automotive repair standards and business practice standards are in play. Repair standards may indicate that simply replacing some of the parts of the assembly may not provide an adequate/long-term/warrantable repair. Anecdotal research indicates that when Nissan was repairing differentials on these vehicles during the warranty period, they were replacing the entire unit as well. That type of repair may provide the best (or only) positive outcomes Additionally, legal regulations typically require that vehicle manufacturers must be able to provide (replacement) parts only during the term of a warranty.
There appear to be no NHTSA complaints/recalls regarding this repair issue.
Other questions: Are any "aftermarket" repair parts available? Is the vehicle owner the original owner? Has the vehicle owner faithfully followed Nissan's recommended inspection and maintenance intervals regarding the differential?
Lastly, when seeking any goodwill consideration from a dealer or automotive manufacturer, loyalty is generally a high priority. If little or no maintenance/service work was performed at a Nissan dealership over the 10 years of vehicle ownership, there may be little cause for any monetary consideration.
My question is what parts in question have actually failed, that would only cost $200?
ASE Master certified Technician.
Contributed by J P. 40 Years In Busines. Curious About Everything, Love Helping People Figure Things Out. - On: 09/28/2016
I'm old enough to mourn the days when you could actually repair something and keep using it, instead of being forced to buy a new 'whatever' because the repair cost is so excessive.
As I understand it, Sweden is set to implement tax breaks for repairing consumer goods so that consumers will be encouraged not to indulge in the throw-away culture.
Wouldn't it be wonderful if we did this in the US?
More to the point, it's absolutely shocking that Nissan is apparently aware that there is a problem with this make and model of Nissan and yet has failed to make parts available. As I read it, the customer is more than aware that his vehicle is out of warranty but thinks that replacement, instead of repair, is unreasonable at some ten times the cost of parts.
And I agree with him. Nissan's response appears to be designed to make its customer look unreasonable, and he (or she) isn't. Nissan, this is shameful. It certainly isn't the way to 'win lifetime customers.'
We are sorry to learn of Mr. Benner’s continued dissatisfaction with our position.We understand Mr. Benner is dissatisfied the rear differential was only available as an assembly when repairs were completed by an independent repair facility and we apologize for any inconvenience the situation may have caused. Our records indicate Mr. Benner’s request for financial assistance was reviewed by a Specialist, who determined Nissan would not be in a position to accommodate his request as his 2005 Titan had substantially exceeded the terms of the New Vehicle Limited Warranty, and therefore, he was responsible for all repair costs. Should Mr. Benner have any questions regarding our position, he is welcome to contact the Specialist directly.Thank you.
I'd like to see any comments from mechanics or other auto industry people about how they feel about this design. Anybody have an opinion? Seems to me the claimant has a case if it costs an arm and a leg to fix something that can be repaired on competing products for a few hundred dollars.
Get a public mediator profile. Anyone can apply.
Join our community and start resolving disputes — it's free and fast.
Let the PeopleClaim community help resolve your dispute.
Would you like to suggest how this case should be resolved?
Would you like to add a comment or solution?
PeopleClaim is a new way to resolve disputes online without lawyers or mediators.
By inviting suggestions from the public, disputing parties get ideas that can lead
to settlement – and the person(s) who contributed them can win a reward.
Here's what to do: Read the case (left side of page). Then go to the bottom of the
page and enter your suggestion in the space provided. Click the Solution button.
Your suggestion will be sent to both parties and will post on the claim. If the
two sides agree to settle based on your suggestion, you're eligible to win. Note:
Cash rewards may be split among more than one person if settlement depends on ideas
from more than one contributor. If you have a claim of your own to resolve, click here.