Public Mediation

My Claim vs. Dentfirst

  • FREE crypto coins; suggest a fair resolution to this case
  • $500 cash reward offered for best resolution
R. C. vs. Dentfirst
1650 Oakbrook Dr Ste 440, Norcross,, Georgia, 30093-1817, United States
Amount Involved: $177,500.00
    • Status: In Negotiation
      This claim has posted for public comment and negotiation. It will remain posted until resolved to the claimant's satisfaction. Suggest a resolution to help these parties reach a settlement.
      (seeking public comment)
    • View response from: Dentfirst
    • Claimant Seeks: View.
    • Claim #: 3179873
    • Amount Involved: 177,500.00
    • Filed On: Dec 17, 2015
    • Posted On: Jan 26, 2016
    • Complaint(s):
      • Commercial / Other dispute
  • Notice: There is a $500 reward for the publicly-contributed resolution that resolves this case.
  • Review this case.
  • Propose your solution.
  • Win the reward (1,000 pts + $500)
Statement of Claim
Claimant says:
"1. Started with Dentfirst September 2011
2. Oral Surgeon pulled back teeth and left fragments embed - Dr. left practice
3. General Dentist pulled fragments and front teeth
4. Implants (two lower) by Periodontist, both were set incorrectly - Dr. left practice next day
5. Temporary dentures could not be made to fit and patient forced to go 6 months with no teeth
6. General Dentist could not make a set of lower dentures that would stay in mouth and charged additional fee to reline dentures - still could not fit without injury to gums and jaw
7. After many more office visits the dentist said he needed more time to get it right. After months of weekly calls to office with no results patient called to tell office manger she wanted a refund and was going to another dentist. Patient was asked to give the practice one more chance. She would see a new dentist because first general dentist had died!
8. Second General Dentist made a set of lower dentures that stayed in but caused so much pain they could not be used for eating. Upper dentures now could not be fit because the bone had receded too much.
9. According to the practice manager DentFirst's Periodontist could not do the upper implants that were now needed and a referral was made to another practice (at patient's own expense)
10. Patient left DentFirst's practice in August 2015 without a usable set of dentures.
11. We feel there has been a breach of contract."
Reply Have a similar problem?
Exhibits View
Additional Communication Between Claimant and Dentfirst Hide
  • Feb 05, 2016, Claiming party added:
  • Please understand the many problems we have had with your Dentists. Since we were forced to go to another Dentist you must refund all monies paid and because of the time and trouble you caused you should pay the Dentist that did fit the dentures. If we must go to court we will ask for punitive damages as well.

  • Feb 08, 2016, Claiming party added:
  • Dear Sir;

    I erroneously assumed that you were completely apprised of all the facts surrounding the problems with DentFirst. I will email you a complete history of our situation and hope with your new eyes you can help to resolve it. Thanking you in advance for what ever help you can provide.

    Ruth Corsover

What Claimant Wants Hide
1. Damages: cost of new dentures Mar 01, 2016 $40,000.00
2. Refund: dentures that did not fit Mar 01, 2016 $12,500.00
3. punitive d Mar 01, 2016 $125,000.00
4. Other – Copy claim to regulators Mar 01, 2016 $14.99
Cash total : $177,514.99
  • 18
Do you agree with the claimant’s demands?  (If you are a party to this claim, click here.)
Help out — earn RHUcoin
  • Suggest a fair resolution: 5 RHU
  • Yes-vote from community: 5 RHU
  • Yes-vote from disputant: 25 RHU each
  • Get the case resolved: 100 RHU
Dustin Black commented
Dustin Black (Comment):
"And how did dentures cost $40,000.00"
 (5 years ago)
Reply
Dustin Black commented
Dustin Black (Comment):
"What happened to make you seek punitive damages?"
 (5 years ago)
Reply
Evgeny Mishakov commented
Evgeny Mishakov (Comment):
"i don't think so"
 (5 years ago)
Reply
Helena Caballero commented
Helena Caballero (Comment):
"Why did it take so long for plaintiff to file claim? Did she ask for refund in 2015?"
 (7 years ago)
Reply
Christopher MARTIN commented
Christopher MARTIN (Comment):
"You stated that the patient left the dental practice in August 2015. Based on that information, the statue of limitations to take any legal action against the dental practice has already expired. The law states the following; OCGA § 9-3-71(a) provides that “an action for medical/dental malpractice shall be brought within two years after the date on which an injury or death arising from a negligent or wrongful act or omission occurred. A cause of action for breach of contract and/or warranty is subject to the same limitation period. That's the legal side of things on this matter. Aside from that, I absolutely do feel that the patient was done wrong by the dentist facility in question and I definitely do feel the patient should be compensated as a result. Unfortunately in my experience, unless legal action is taken in a matter like this, I wouldn't count on the dentist facility even acknowledging your complaint/claim, much less compensation, refunded or making things right. But I wish you the best of luck."
 (7 years ago)
Reply
Irene Gomez likes
Irene Gomez ():
"Its pretty fair, Doubt they'll get damages but personally I think they deserve them."
 (7 years ago)
Reply
Irene Gomez says maybe M
Irene Gomez ("MAYBE"):
"Is this case resolved? One of the worst I've seen here. Is Dent first still in hiding? Are they still in business?"
 (7 years ago)
Reply
Respondent's Counteroffer Hide
The claimant's settlement terms were rejected with the following explanation:
  • "We are very sorry to hear of any troubles you may have had with your dentist. We will be glad to discuss this with you directly. You can contact us at dharlin@dentfirst.com. "

This claim will remain posted until resolved.

  • 0
Do you agree with the respondent’s Response?  (If you are a party to this claim, click here.)
Help out — earn RHUcoin
  • Suggest a fair resolution: 5 RHU
  • Yes-vote from community: 5 RHU
  • Yes-vote from disputant: 25 RHU each
  • Get the case resolved: 100 RHU
Refresh
  • Show:
  • Sort by:
  • 1
  • Contributed Solution: by David Dogan On 01-23-2023
    Claimant has a fairly common complaint as dentures often do not fit as well as claimant believes they should and Dentist often believes they have been made as well as possible. Most often, the truth is between the two positions. A claimant should work with the dentist to seek different gels and bonding agents, as well as in house modifications of the actual denture, to achieve a better fit. The dentist should be willing to take the time to closely examine and carefully measure the dental device made to his/her specifications. Were all of the specifications and directions by the manufacturing facility observed and carefully measured and checked? Are there records to show the exactness of the production facility? If not, then an adjustment and a reasonable sum for the patient inconvenience and loss of time and enjoyment of the benefit paid for is in order. I am not sure new dentures would cost $40,000 if the first set cost only $12,500, unless the first set were truly substandard and inferior materials and fit. If claimant has found a dentist that "assures" a "perfect" for $40,000, then dentist would be wise to refund the $12,500 to the new dentist/dental device manufacturer and pay 1/2 of the difference (40,000 - 12,500 = $27,500/2 = $13,750 in exchange for a release from the claimant
If you are a party to this claim, click here.
Is this a fair resolution?
  • 1
  • Contributed Solution: by Jose Gonzalez On 11-07-2022
    Claimant should be entitled to recover losses created by negligence from the Defendant(s). Claimant should have filed a claim with the respective insurance companies that the t carried insurance from as a standard matter of possible liability. With regard to Punitive Damages, I feel they are to high so $15,000 for the six months of the emotional aggravation should be enough
If you are a party to this claim, click here.
Is this a fair resolution?
  • 3
  • Contributed Solution: by Lauren Durant On 06-14-2021
    After reading the uploaded exhibits and reviewing the claimants process to go about getting this fixed the fair way first, I absolutely believe this claimant should be entitled to every penny asked. Dentists are doctors. They perform surgery as well. They are held to the same medical practices every doctor is held to by the state they are employed in.
If you are a party to this claim, click here.
Is this a fair resolution?
  • 1
If you are a party to this claim, click here.
Is this a fair resolution?
  • 1
  • Contributed Solution: by Ronald Fredey On 01-06-2021
    The following is not legal advice but general information: If the statute of limitations has passed for a medical/dental malpractice case, you still may be eligible to file a case based on Consumer Protection Laws in your State.
If you are a party to this claim, click here.
Is this a fair resolution?
  • 1
  • Contributed Solution: by Rebecca B On 07-14-2020
    Does the claimant still have needs that have not been met? The health of the claimant should be their first concern. And, if respondent is willing, perhaps that can be addressed and once a solution is satisfactorily performed at no charge and a moderate sum be paid in installments for the horrible situation can be made.
If you are a party to this claim, click here.
Is this a fair resolution?
  • 1
  • Contributed Solution: by Sarah Lascara On 02-25-2020
    Seems like the charges for the treatment are unreasonable. Was any insurance involved? I believe the statute to sue has expired if anything I feel the patient should be refunded all out-of-pocket monies and any money insurance paid be returned to them.
If you are a party to this claim, click here.
Is this a fair resolution?
  • 1
  • Contributed Solution: by Zbigniew Malecki On 12-01-2018
    1. Damages: cost of new dentures Mar 01, 2016 $12,500.00 (up to the amount of unfit dentures) 2. Refund: dentures that did not fit Mar 01, 2016 $12,500.00 3. Punitive d Mar 01, 2016 $12,500.00 (up to the amount of unfit dentures) 4. Other – Copy claim to regulators Mar 01, 2016 $14.99
If you are a party to this claim, click here.
Is this a fair resolution?
  • 1
If you are a party to this claim, click here.
Is this a fair resolution?
  • 1
  • Contributed Solution: by becklyn paul On 06-09-2018
    I think this client has been treated unfairly and deserves compensation or even refund for services not rendered proffessionally.
If you are a party to this claim, click here.
Is this a fair resolution?
  • Question: by Ghazalle S. Hosseini I Enjoy Helping People Resolve Disputes.
  • On: 04-25-2016
  • Dear Claim #3179873

    Have you spoken to DentFirstz? And what was their response or negotiation?

  • 4
  • Contributed Solution: by Jim Wicks On 03-30-2016
If you are a party to this claim, click here.
Is this a fair resolution?
  • Comment: by Tihomir Liptak (40 points) — Love Helping People Resolve Disputes
  • On: 03-30-2016
  • Really sorry to hear about this situation. Let's come together and get this resolved for you. 
  • Comment: by Steve Wonder (40 points) — Online mediator
  • On: 03-03-2016
  • I had a similar situation with my dentist, but finally got it resolved through PeopleClaim.
  • 5
  • Contributed Solution: by john shi On 05-27-2018
    ConsiderIng patient has gone through so much suffering without much improvement of her condition, I would suggest that the dental practice refund the full fee of $12,500. However, it is hard to establish malpractice here, plus the statue of limitation may have passed. The cost to remake the new dentures with new implants should not be entirely responsibility of the previous dentists as the patient received more advanced treatment than she was previously treatment planned. Punitive damage is difficult to assess and if both parties are willing to settle, it should be removed.
If you are a party to this claim, click here.
Is this a fair resolution?
  • 4
  • Contributed Solution: by Irseg Romero On 04-30-2018
    At first glance there is a breach of contract. It was also bad practice of the second Dr. However the patient went to another Dentist which could have caused damage to the dentition and made it impossible to continue with the practice that the first dr was doing.
If you are a party to this claim, click here.
Is this a fair resolution?
  • 4
  • Contributed Solution: by Dustin Krueger On 03-08-2018
    Well it sounds to me you went through hell to get dentures hopefully you are good now.I would suggest you get a more precise number for the cost of repair and go from there
If you are a party to this claim, click here.
Is this a fair resolution?
  • 1
  • Contributed Solution: by Noor Bilbeisi On 02-26-2018
    Refund of all monies paid by patient and insurance to patient so that patient can go elsewhere to have work redone. It seems that the implants that were placed may have been causing an ill fitting denture and removal and replacement will cost even more now, that should be paid by dentfirst. It does not seem that long term problems were caused, although going a year without dentures is extreme. Dentures tend to hurt and need relining and adjustments. Did the patient follow up with recare and adjustments when in pain?
If you are a party to this claim, click here.
Is this a fair resolution?
  • 1
  • Contributed Solution: by Neeraj Gupta On 01-13-2018
    A public forum is no place to resolve such disputes. Besides, the statute of limitations has passed. In this case I suggest the following 1. Dentfirst retains the fees for the initial visit, X-Rays, extractions. 2. Dentfirst refunds the fee for implants, dentures, relines and any corrective work to the extractions since that fee is included in the initial extractions Fee. There is no evidence that any permanent damage has been done to the patient. 3. There are no punitive or other damages. When patient goes to a Chain Dentistry place, where each time there is a new Dentist then they can expect such kind of care. So the patient also has a responsibility. 4. Patient to seek care from a new Dentist elsewhere.
If you are a party to this claim, click here.
Is this a fair resolution?
  • 1
If you are a party to this claim, click here.
Is this a fair resolution?
  • -1
  • Contributed Solution: by Christopher MARTIN On 12-23-2017
    DentFirst responded to your claim and instructed you to contact them regarding this matter directly and they provided the following email address to do so: dharlin@dentfirst.com That's exactly what you need to do for resolution in this matter. When you contact DentFirst, state the facts of this matter and provide any documentation you may have in support. Be very clear in explanation as to who, what, when, where and why. Then tell them exactly what you are seeking from them as a fair resolution. Be reasonable.
If you are a party to this claim, click here.
Is this a fair resolution?
  • 3
If you are a party to this claim, click here.
Is this a fair resolution?
  • 2
  • Contributed Solution: by Christopher MARTIN On 12-21-2017
    Another dentist would be required to act as an expert witness in order to pursue the matter through the courts legally. But unfortunately, the statue of limitations has already expired on taking legal action.
If you are a party to this claim, click here.
Is this a fair resolution?
  • 1
If you are a party to this claim, click here.
Is this a fair resolution?
  • 2
  • Contributed Solution: by J S On 12-21-2017
    Dentfirst should offer to refund the $12,500 and another $12,500 (in Rhu) as compensation to close this case.
If you are a party to this claim, click here.
Is this a fair resolution?
  • 6
If you are a party to this claim, click here.
Is this a fair resolution?
  • 2
  • Contributed Solution: by Irene Gomez On 12-19-2017
    Would DentFirst and the claimant agree to a vote by the PeopleClaim community for the best resolution and then settle based upon it? This would show that Dentfirst cares about what the public feels is fair and the claimant would also be bound by the terms. they could both agree to some parameters first such as maximum awards etc. So, I'd encourage DentFirst- add 3 options that they'd consider, and the claimant to add three of their own and lets let everyone vote on the best resolution from each side. Then we can see if a deal can be negotiated between those.
If you are a party to this claim, click here.
Is this a fair resolution?
  • -1
  • Contributed Solution: by Dave M On 07-29-2017
    The dental office should not have to return any monies paid for services received. However, they should try to make the customer if it's within their expertise to do so. But it seems there is no way to make this customer satisfied. There should be no punitive damages given. Only refunds returned should be what was paid during the time wasted.
If you are a party to this claim, click here.
Is this a fair resolution?
  • 6
  • Contributed Solution: by VARTIKA MISRA On 05-27-2017
    Dentfirst and the client shall agree on compensation to the extent of $100,000.00 and refund of amount of $12,500 for the pain and discomfort caused. More...
If you are a party to this claim, click here.
Is this a fair resolution?
  • -1
  • Contributed Solution: by Jessica Lothman On 04-29-2017
    Minimally Dentfirst owes client a refund and some amount for time and pain caused by the delay. Since neither party wants trial, the consideration for the parties is payment and a resolution for one and minimizing collateral damages for the other. More...
If you are a party to this claim, click here.
Is this a fair resolution?
  • 2
  • Contributed Solution: by Dev Annand On 04-26-2017
    My solution is to turn this into a class action. Obviously Dentfirst isn't too worried about losing business and they don't care to mediate with the claimant. Is there a mechanism to reach other Dentfirst patients with similar issues? More...
If you are a party to this claim, click here.
Is this a fair resolution?
  • 1
  • Contributed Solution: by su pang On 04-25-2017
    if claimant seeking to a punitive damage, it better for him/her to resolve this issue though court instead of mediation or arbitration.
If you are a party to this claim, click here.
Is this a fair resolution?
  • Comment: by Dev Annand (296 points) — Engineer, Mediator, Cricket Fan
  • On: 04-25-2017
  • Seems Dentfirst isn't going to show good faith and respond to any of these suggestions.  They need to be sued and sued big IMO.  IF that happens maybe they'll understand the value of negotiating in good faith and trying to help this poor person.  


    Hiding from pubic opinion isn't a good business strategy - take if from United Air...


    Anyway - I wish both parties luck in reaching a fair resolution. I'm tending to side with the claimant because of Dentfirst's obstinance.  Hope thats fair.

  • 8
  • Contributed Solution: by Jasmin Ellis-Logan On 04-24-2017
    A review of DentFirst's responses reflects its ignorance of the claimant's time, money, and pain with getting the teeth fixed. I would suggest that the claimant contact DentFirst again detailing the damages that she seeks, especially elaborating on More...
If you are a party to this claim, click here.
Is this a fair resolution?
  • -3
  • Contributed Solution: by Jennie Alsobrooks On 04-15-2017
    I think that the claimant should take Dentfirst to court to get a refund because if they had done it right the first time the claimant wouldn't be having all this problem with their dentures. It's not the claimant fault that the dentures didn't fit.
If you are a party to this claim, click here.
Is this a fair resolution?
  • 9
  • Contributed Solution: by Keith Schulner On 04-12-2017
    My suggestion it to settle for a refund of money paid, e.g. the $12,500. I have mediated to settlement hundreds of cases and based on that experience, both sides will not like this suggestion but it will be much better than the alternative of trial. More...
If you are a party to this claim, click here.
Is this a fair resolution?
  • 4
  • Contributed Solution: by Christopher Olson On 03-29-2017
    $15,000 to claimaint. The amount paid to the potential Defendant is compensation for the non-fitting dentures as well as for the time and effort to procure new dentures. More...
If you are a party to this claim, click here.
Is this a fair resolution?
  • Question: by Christopher Olson (28 points) — I Am An Attorney With 18 Years Experience Litigating And Mediating All Sorts Of Disputes.
  • On: 03-29-2017
  • Did you sign any warranty or release upon purchasing the original dentures and corresponding dental services?
  • Comment: by stephanie moore — Online mediator
  • On: 02-17-2017
  • This is  very sad because the patient has suffered though quit a bit.  This is not about money because the patient kept coming back for correction which seemed to have failed the patient whom trusted the facility. So because of pain and suffering they should be compensated. I would like to vote for the total amount but it seems a little bit extreme. So they should be paid for their pain and great sufferring. Verdict for the complaintif
  • 1
  • Contributed Solution: by ONNECIA BROWN On 01-15-2017
    Hi Client or Customer My Questions are as follow: What was the original payment plan? Installations or do you have a health insurance?Make a complaint to BBB in the state you are in and the school of Dntistry. Do your homework don't delay.
If you are a party to this claim, click here.
Is this a fair resolution?
  • 2
  • Contributed Solution: by Kelly Hodges On 01-07-2017
    I think that's way to much for a settlement. If you took care of your teeth and gums to begin with you wouldn't have to wait for your gums and bones to heal for dentures. More...
If you are a party to this claim, click here.
Is this a fair resolution?
  • 2
  • Contributed Solution: by Nina Tina On 06-02-2016
    Dentfirst needs to respond to this claim with a monetary settlement offer to compensate the claimant for her suffering. More...
If you are a party to this claim, click here.
Is this a fair resolution?
  • 2
  • Contributed Solution: by Dina Garcia On 05-04-2016
    Trial and Error More...
If you are a party to this claim, click here.
Is this a fair resolution?
  • 2
  • Contributed Solution: by Mark Deuitch On 04-25-2016
If you are a party to this claim, click here.
Is this a fair resolution?
  • 2
  • Contributed Solution: by Ortis Pyronneau On 01-06-2017
    The process is to let the company know that she is willing to negotiate with the involvement of and unbiased dental professional that would analyze the situation and make a statement on the record that can be used either for a trial or mediation More...
If you are a party to this claim, click here.
Is this a fair resolution?
  • Comment: by matin BROWN General Practice For More Then 35 Years
  • On: 01-06-2017
  • IF THE PT IS INTERESTED IN OBTAINING GOOD FUNCTION TEETH, I WOULD RECOMMEND A CONSULTATION AND TREATMENT FROM  A BOARD CERTIFIED PROSTHODONTIST AND HIS PRESENT DENTIST AND/OR HIS INSURANCE COMPANY WILL MAKE APPROPRIATE PAYMENTS.   THE PROSTHODONTIST WILL BE ABLE TO MAKE A JUDGEMENT  IF THERE WAS SIGNIFICANT MALPRACTICE, IN WHICH CASE A SETTLEMENT WIIL BE MADE.  IF NO MALPRACTICE WAS OBVIOUS, JUST GET THE PATIENT COMFORTABLE AND REFUND HIS PAYMENTS.
  • Comment: by Sam Shepard (168 points) — I Love Resolving Disputes
  • On: 12-16-2016
  • Ruth, could you post or arrange to send the back ground info that you offered to send to Dentfirst to Irving and see if he can help mediate a resolution to your case?    Seems he can give you an expert perspective which Dentfirst should respect- even if they don't entirely agree.    I don't have the background in dentistry that Irv and Hans do, but I'd be glad to add my comments as well once the info is there.  


    Thanks

  • -2
  • Contributed Solution: by Robert Haake On 12-12-2016
    If any of the dentists involved are members of the local Dental Society, the patient could go through their Peer Review system to help resolve the issue. If not, they could consider filing a complaint with the State Dental Board.
If you are a party to this claim, click here.
Is this a fair resolution?
  • Comment: by hans sperling — Online mediator
  • On: 12-12-2016
  • This does seem like the claimsnt has a real case against The dentists and this dental practice.  Why is there so much turnover in dentists at this practice? Does a dentist own the practice?

    It does look like there was negligence in the treatment planning phase. It is time to file a lawsuit

  • Question: by Irving Eckstein I Am A Dds Orthodontist And A Dentist And A Pharmacist
  • On: 11-30-2016
  • I am very experienced in dentistry and would like to see what the dr did in his treatment and did the patient follow his advice and if you could forward me some statements from the treating dr and the patient as well I can give you my expert advice to resolve this

  • 0
If you are a party to this claim, click here.
Is this a fair resolution?
  • 2
  • Contributed Solution: by Sandra Jovan On 10-07-2016
    Responding full refund sufficient to get the proper dentures plus reasonable compensation for pain and suffering- to be negotiated privately between the parties.
If you are a party to this claim, click here.
Is this a fair resolution?
  • 2
  • Contributed Solution: by Teresa Morgan Smith On 10-07-2016
    Go on twitter start with @ then their name. Start complaining. This will wake them up this is their reputation, they will want you to direct message them. This is how I got my claim started. I just woke up @ Tylenol.
If you are a party to this claim, click here.
Is this a fair resolution?
  • 0
  • Contributed Solution: by Cae McCreary On 09-20-2016
    seems he wants to talk. if h and you cannot work out a solution i would tell him you are going to report him to dental board ad very review and claim site there is, tell local news in his area about issue, make and a vid for youtube. this was my sol
If you are a party to this claim, click here.
Is this a fair resolution?
  • 2
  • Contributed Solution: by Natalie D. On 09-01-2016
    Should be granted the cost of a new pair of dentures, plus some money for inconvenience. More...
If you are a party to this claim, click here.
Is this a fair resolution?
  • 2
  • Contributed Solution: by Mary Delaney On 08-27-2016
    This seems to be a case of incompetent dentistry. I would think for the sake of their reputation they would offer to give her the care she needs and some compensation for what shes been through.
If you are a party to this claim, click here.
Is this a fair resolution?
  • Question: by Matt Murphy (20 points) — Mediator With Years Of Legal Experience. Give Me A Case And I'll Get It Settled
  • On: 08-21-2016
  • Can you add a second opinion from another dentist.  I was thinking of using these guys but this give me pause.  
  • Comment: by Ghazalle S. Hosseini I Enjoy Helping People Resolve Disputes.
  • On: 08-04-2016
  • Why is the claimant not responding to our posts?
  • Question: by Teresa Shipley (220 points) — Online mediator
  • On: 07-12-2016
  • Client, has Dentfirst reached out to you or have you been in contact with them since their reply?
  • Comment: by Tina Johnson I Am An International Law Student Enthusiastic About Civil & International Relations Issue
  • On: 07-12-2016
  • Claimant should get a full refund and compensation for all that she has gone through! 
  • Question: by Tina Johnson I Am An International Law Student Enthusiastic About Civil & International Relations Issue
  • On: 07-12-2016
  • Has the claimant try contacting Dentfirst agian?
  • 6
  • Contributed Solution: by Hiram Wright On 07-07-2016
    When dental work wasnt done correctly the 1st time it leads to future problems and even health risks i say claimant is entitled to full refunds and at bbq least a percentage of punitive damages. Fair to claimant who was apparently wronged. More...
If you are a party to this claim, click here.
Is this a fair resolution?
  • 6
  • Contributed Solution: by April Pollefeyt On 07-03-2016
    Contact the Georgia State Dentistry Department than the American Dental Association More...
If you are a party to this claim, click here.
Is this a fair resolution?
  • 6
  • Contributed Solution: by Jonesha Taylor On 06-25-2016
    the claimant should receive a refund minus the percentage for the extractions of the bottom teeth and dentfirst should pay the fees for the operation for her to get the replacements from a third party More...
If you are a party to this claim, click here.
Is this a fair resolution?
  • 1
  • Contributed Solution: by Aline Gadson On 06-19-2016
    Claimant should ask for full pay from Dentfirst. More...
If you are a party to this claim, click here.
Is this a fair resolution?
  • 2
  • Contributed Solution: by Teresa Shipley On 06-15-2016
    Counter offer a percentage off her billed expenses. Help her get this resolved in the most professional way possible without adding more expenses to it.
If you are a party to this claim, click here.
Is this a fair resolution?
  • Comment: by Teresa Shipley (220 points) — Online mediator
  • On: 06-12-2016
  • I've had a similar situation with a dental practice and they didn't think twice about making it right. I suggest that Dentfirst get in touch with this client immediately and offer some kind od solution for her. It's been going on for way too long. Client, sign a release immediately for them to make comments on peo PeopleClaim.com. make a comment on here that states you did so and when. It would be in Dentfirst ' s BEST interest to resolve this matter promptly as it is looking quite unprofessional for them. Even a comment just to request the release. Let's take the first step Dentfirst... The ball is in your court.
  • 4
  • Contributed Solution: by CHRISTOPHER MARTIN On 03-03-2016
If you are a party to this claim, click here.
Is this a fair resolution?
  • 3
  • Contributed Solution: by Aline Gadson On 03-02-2016
If you are a party to this claim, click here.
Is this a fair resolution?
  • Comment: by Mr Salmon Koenig (260 points) — Retired Lawyer. Now Mediating Civil Cases In Europe
  • On: 02-09-2016
  • Have to wonder why they are afraid to discuss the matter here. Guess it could be a confidentiality issue. Ruth, could you add a comment here giving Dentfirst permission to discuss your claim here in public? They would need that permission from you. Otherwise maybe they will settle with you separately. Seems you have a good case, but I need to read it in more detail before I can offer a view on fairness and resolution. Good luck though. I'll comment more later.
Get fast access to our Resolver community, for...
  • help with a PeopleClaim or any other complaint
  • assistance with a purchase or contract
  • expert advice
Other PeopleClaim resolvers
Get Free alerts when claims post in your area.
Get Alert

Case Summary

This summary is provided by a third-party contributor and may not fully represent the views of the claimant. Viewers are encouraged to read full details on the left side of the page.

by moderator: Jim

Case involves a series of dental procedures that patient claims left her with substantial debt, suffering, and inconvenience — and no teeth. Claimant is on social security, has no other income, and seeks damages and refund totaling more than $177,000.


Help resolve this case

Read the full claim details, add your suggested resolution, and win the reward.

Need help resolving a dispute? Learn more.

Public Mediation

The shortest path from your problem to its resolution.
1
Peer to Peer

Engage the other party and use powerful tools to negotiate the best resolution.

Free
If Unresolved
2
Community Resolution

Post your case online and get help from legal professionals, industry experts, consumers & advocates competing to find the best resolution to your claim.

$14.99 + optional reward for best resolution
Full refund if not resolved to your satisfaction
If Unresolved
3
Private Mediation

Lets you mediate your case privately with the help of our professional mediators and industry experts.

Free to claimant. Mediator fees negotiable.
If Unresolved
4
Engage a Professional

Find the best community-reviewed professionals near you to resolve your issue in private online mediation or traditional court/mediation.

Resolution

A wonderful serenity has taken possession of my entire soul, like these sweet mornings of spring which I enjoy with my whole heart.

I am (not) alone, and I feel the charm of existence in this spot, which was created for the bliss of souls like mine...~ Goethe

Get a public verdict — create an online trial $50 public trial / $50 reward for successful resolution
Important: All information contained herein is the opinion of the posting parties, who are solely responsible for its content. PeopleClaim offers both free and paid services to help consumers, patients, employee, tenants, and others resolve disputes without lawyers or courts, through negotiated online settlement and public disclosure of wrongdoing or unfair treatment.
Claims against parties operating under bankruptcy protection, by law must be processed solely through the appropriate US bankruptcy court. Any claims against this party currently posted on PeopleClaim are available for purposes of public business review only and are not an attempt to collect money or recover assets subject to protections under the United States Bankruptcy Code.
*IMPORTANT: PeopleClaim is a public dispute resolution system, independent of the BBB, small claims court, or other dispute resolution services. PeopleClaim is not a law firm and does not provide legal services, opinions, or advice. PeopleClaim facilitates peer-to-peer negotiation and resolution and crowdsourced input on issues of fairness to help resolve complaints. Users should contact professional legal counsel on any matters of law or regulation regarding their claims. PeopleClaim does not review or evaluate the merits of claims submitted through its site, and users are solely responsible for all content filed in their claims.
© reserved by PeopleClaim