North American Community of Faith vs. The Honourable Jody Wilson-Raybould, Department Of Justice And Attorney General

    • Status: In Negotiation
      This claim has posted for public comment and negotiation. It will remain posted until resolved to the claimant's satisfaction. Suggest a resolution to help these parties reach a settlement.
      (seeking public comment)
    • Claimant Seeks: 1 non-monetary items.
    • Claim #: 1008189
    • Amount Involved: N/A
    • Filed On: Aug 16, 2016
    • Posted On: Aug 27, 2016
    • Complaint(s):
      • Unjust or misguided public policy
      • Public health hazard
      • Environmental issue
  • Notice: Sent by registered mail RE 335304924US August 19 2016
  • Review this case.
  • Propose your solution.
  • Win the reward (1,000)
Complaint(s) Involved (4) Hide
Unjust Or Misguided Public Policy
Public Health Hazard
Environmental Issue
Other

Claimant's opinion: Disregarding the people's right to information about what is in their food.

Claimant's opinion:

The Canadian Ministries of Health and Environment, by approving the sale of unlabeled genetically engineered salmon for human consumption, without fully analyzing its potential risks, is disregarding citizens’ right to know what is in their food, and endangering human health and the environment.

• As the taro plant is considered a relative to the indigenous Hawaiians; likewise the salmon is considered a relative to the indigenous cultures of North America, and intrinsic to their ancient and sacred customs. Therefore, to protect and preserve the cultural integrity of indigenous civilizations, salmon genes and their DNA must remain inviolable.

• Genetically engineered salmon was invented by combining two strands of DNA, constructed artificially from the DNA of the Chinook salmon and the eel-like species called an ocean pout. This technique is fundamentally different from traditional methods of selective breeding or hybridization that are performed within the natural reproductive context; and produces outcomes that could never occur in nature.

• By breaking down the protective barriers that exist to prevent the transfer of genes between species, genetic engineers have radically restructured the DNA of an entire species.

• Genetically engineered salmon could escape, which would produce unintended effects within each ecosystem to which it belongs.

• While genetically engineered salmon is presumed safe for consumption, it has not been tested for human safety. Therefore, consuming genetically engineered salmon could cause unpredictable and potentially adverse effects on human health.

Revised August 18 2016

What Claimant Wants
  • Claimant agrees to resolve this matter under the following proposed terms of settlement.
  • Status: In Negotiation
    This claim has posted for public comment and negotiation. It will remain posted until resolved to the claimant's satisfaction. Suggest a resolution to help these parties reach a settlement.
  • Canadian Ministry Of Justice is asked to agree and settle or make a good-faith counteroffer, offer a rebuttal, or request additional information.
What By When
1. Change of policy: All genetically engineered salmon sold for human or animal consumption must carry labels printed in English or French: “Genetically engineered salmon.” Sep 05, 2017
Non-cash: 1 items
Help resolve this case. Earn negotiation points. See how it works.

COMMUNITY FEEDBACK ABOUT THIS CLAIM Hide

The PeopleClaim community includes volunteers who are passionate about justice – consumer advocates, legal professionals, people with knowledge of specific industries and trades, and anyone who has useful suggestions to help disputing parties resolve a case.
  • Show:
  • Sort by:
  • My Solution: Food-labelling All in a nutshell*
  • Contributed by Jason K. Waterloo Civilan Police Service Avec Waterloo* And Provincial Government Ontario | On: 11/27/2016

  • WHIMS - Labelling  and http://www.inspection.gc.ca/about-the-cfia/accountability/inspection-modernization/inspector-training/eng/1356144744048/1356145141989

    foods* must be labelled; to genetically modify a substance sounds scary the least. Careful* 

How would you rate this solution?
  • Unfair
  • 0
  • Very Fair
-5
5
  • Comment: Contributed by Anne D., Founder And Director Of Truth In Labeling Coalition On: 08/29/2016
  • "Claims that there is a consensus among scientific and governmental bodies that genetically engineered foods are safe, or that they are no more risky than non-GMO foods are false." http://www.ensser.org/increasing-public-information/no-scientific-consensus-on-gmo-safety/ 

    "An expert panel of the Royal Society of Canada issued a report that was highly critical of the regulatory system for GMO foods and crops in Canada. The report declared that it is “scientifically unjustifiable” to presume that GMO foods are safe without rigorous scientific testing and that the “default prediction” for every GMO food should be that the introduction of a new gene will cause “unanticipated changes” in the expression of other genes, the pattern of proteins produced, and/or metabolic activities. Possible outcomes of these changes identified in the report included the presence of new or unexpected allergens:" http://www.rsc.ca//files/publications/expert_panels/foodbiotechnology/GMreportEN.pdf  Furthermore, the unintended effects of genetic engineering documented in the scientific literature are not disputable: http://natureinstitute.org/nontarget/browse_titles.htm Even so, proving that genetically engineered salmon is harmful is not necessary in order to require mandatory labeling before it is sold for human consumption.

Need help resolving a dispute? Learn more.
Invite a mediator to help get your claim resolved fairly.
Important: All information contained herein is the opinion of the posting parties, who are solely responsible for its content. PeopleClaim offers both free and paid services to help consumers, patients, employee, tenants, and others resolve disputes without lawyers or courts, through negotiated online settlement and public disclosure of wrongdoing or unfair treatment.
Claims against parties operating under bankruptcy protection, by law must be processed solely through the appropriate US bankruptcy court. Any claims against this party currently posted on PeopleClaim are available for purposes of public business review only and are not an attempt to collect money or recover assets subject to protections under the United States Bankruptcy Code.

*IMPORTANT: PeopleClaim is a public dispute resolution system, independent of the BBB, small claims court, or other dispute resolution services. PeopleClaim is not a law firm and does not provide legal services, opinions, or advice. PeopleClaim facilitates peer-to-peer negotiation and resolution and crowdsourced input on issues of fairness to help resolve complaints. Users should contact professional legal counsel on any matters of law or regulation regarding their claims. PeopleClaim does not review or evaluate the merits of claims submitted through its site, and users are solely responsible for all content filed in their claims.