PeopleClaim helps resolve consumer and commercial complaints against businesses,
professionals, government agencies, or individuals by exposing bad business practices
and unfair treatment. Aggrieved parties are invited to use PeopleClaim's dispute
resolution process free of charge or choose premium options that may help resolve
Claimant's opinion: Disregarding the people's right to information about what is in their food.
The Canadian Ministries of Health and Environment, by approving the sale of unlabeled genetically engineered salmon for human consumption, without fully analyzing its potential risks, is disregarding citizens’ right to know what is in their food, and endangering human health and the environment.• As the taro plant is considered a relative to the indigenous Hawaiians; likewise the salmon is considered a relative to the indigenous cultures of North America, and intrinsic to their ancient and sacred customs. Therefore, to protect and preserve the cultural integrity of indigenous civilizations, salmon genes and their DNA must remain inviolable.• Genetically engineered salmon was invented by combining two strands of DNA, constructed artificially from the DNA of the Chinook salmon and the eel-like species called an ocean pout. This technique is fundamentally different from traditional methods of selective breeding or hybridization that are performed within the natural reproductive context; and produces outcomes that could never occur in nature. • By breaking down the protective barriers that exist to prevent the transfer of genes between species, genetic engineers have radically restructured the DNA of an entire species.• Genetically engineered salmon could escape, which would produce unintended effects within each ecosystem to which it belongs.• While genetically engineered salmon is presumed safe for consumption, it has not been tested for human safety. Therefore, consuming genetically engineered salmon could cause unpredictable and potentially adverse effects on human health.Revised August 18 2016
Contributed by Jason K. Waterloo Civilan Police Service Avec Waterloo* And Provincial Government Ontario | - On: 11/27/2016
WHIMS - Labelling and http://www.inspection.gc.ca/about-the-cfia/accountability/inspection-modernization/inspector-training/eng/1356144744048/1356145141989foods* must be labelled; to genetically modify a substance sounds scary the least. Careful*
"Claims that there is a consensus among scientific and governmental bodies that genetically engineered foods are safe, or that they are no more risky than non-GMO foods are false." http://www.ensser.org/increasing-public-information/no-scientific-consensus-on-gmo-safety/
"An expert panel of the Royal Society of Canada issued a report that was highly critical of the regulatory system for GMO foods and crops in Canada. The report declared that it is “scientifically unjustifiable” to presume that GMO foods are safe without rigorous scientific testing and that the “default prediction” for every GMO food should be that the introduction of a new gene will cause “unanticipated changes” in the expression of other genes, the pattern of proteins produced, and/or metabolic activities. Possible outcomes of these changes identified in the report included the presence of new or unexpected allergens:" http://www.rsc.ca//files/publications/expert_panels/foodbiotechnology/GMreportEN.pdf Furthermore, the unintended effects of genetic engineering documented in the scientific literature are not disputable: http://natureinstitute.org/nontarget/browse_titles.htm Even so, proving that genetically engineered salmon is harmful is not necessary in order to require mandatory labeling before it is sold for human consumption.
Get a public mediator profile. Anyone can apply.
Join our community and start resolving disputes — it's free and fast.
Let the PeopleClaim community help resolve your dispute.
Would you like to suggest how this case should be resolved?
Would you like to add a comment or solution?
PeopleClaim is a new way to resolve disputes online without lawyers or mediators.
By inviting suggestions from the public, disputing parties get ideas that can lead
to settlement – and the person(s) who contributed them can win a reward.
Here's what to do: Read the case (left side of page). Then go to the bottom of the
page and enter your suggestion in the space provided. Click the Solution button.
Your suggestion will be sent to both parties and will post on the claim. If the
two sides agree to settle based on your suggestion, you're eligible to win. Note:
Cash rewards may be split among more than one person if settlement depends on ideas
from more than one contributor. If you have a claim of your own to resolve, click here.